The institution of critique and the critique of institutions
Citations
330 citations
51 citations
45 citations
34 citations
Cites background from "The institution of critique and the..."
...12 For discussions of pragmatic sociology, see C. Browne (2014), Bénatouïl (1999), Celikates (2006) and Wagner (1999)....
[...]
References
1,412 citations
"The institution of critique and the..." refers background in this paper
...Similarly, Boltanski and Chiapello contend that capitalism is Boltanski’s assertion that institutions are always incomplete (Boltanski 2011; Boltanski and Chiapello 2005; Castoriadis 1987)....
[...]
...These facets of Boltanski’s conception of institutions have definite affinities with Castoriadis’s interpretation of the imaginary institution of society (Castoriadis 1987)....
[...]
...…these two critiques and, to varying extents, this synthesis was articulated by the other theoretical circles that influenced the student revolts and radical movements of that period, like ‘Socialism or Barbarism’ and The Situationist International (Castoriadis 1987, 1988; Lefort 1986; Debord 1995)....
[...]
...Like John Searle and Castoriadis, Boltanski develops a version of the thesis that institutions enable practices that lead to their consolidation (Searle 2005; Castoriadis 1987)....
[...]
...The Frankfurt School could be considered to offer a synthesis of these two critiques and, to varying extents, this synthesis was articulated by the other theoretical circles that influenced the student revolts and radical movements of that period, like ‘Socialism or Barbarism’ and The Situationist International (Castoriadis 1987, 1988; Lefort 1986; Debord 1995)....
[...]
1,354 citations
813 citations
"The institution of critique and the..." refers background in this paper
...…on various conceptions to be found in the history of political philosophy, Boltanski and Thévenot originally described six ‘cités’ or ‘polities’ that constitute ‘worlds’ or general frameworks of justification: domestic, industrial, inspired, market, civic, and fame (Boltanski and Thévenot 2006)....
[...]
...‘A domestic being ‘‘gives according to what he is given’’, in proportion to the domain that contains it’ (Boltanski and Thévenot 2006: 246)....
[...]
...There is undoubtedly some exaggeration to Boltanski and Thévenot’s assertion that the higher common principles ‘may thus be said to constitute the basic political equipment needed to fabricate a social bond’ (Boltanski and Thévenot 2006: 71)....
[...]
...Once this is done through some agreed upon sense of equivalence and on the basis of a higher common principle then the situation ‘hangs together’ (Boltanski and Thévenot 2006)....
[...]
...(Boltanski and Thévenot 2006: 128) Boltanski has certainly developed an approach to the critical social theory problem of the conversion between the subjectivity of social actors and the objectivity of institutions....
[...]