Abstract: Introduction As a result of concerted efforts by scientists from a wide range of disciplines, we are coming to realize the crucial role played by Ca2 in biological functions. In the realm of biochemistry, especially, there has been recently an explosive rise in our knowledge about Ca2 effects on numerous cellular reactions, processes, and structural components. One emerging concept is that Ca2 ‘ serves as regulator of many of these. In such wellexamined phenomena as muscle contraction, a high degree of compartmentalization of Ca2 , coupled with the cell’s ability to mobilize Ca2 among various compartments (and thus to locally alter levels of reactive Ca2 ), is the means by which this is achieved (2). Often, direct measurement of the dynamics of free Ca2 is technologically difficult. Many have chosen instead to cxamine intracellular Ca2 -binding or Ca2 -sequestration sites in the search for clues on regulatory processes. There exist several histochemical techniques for localization of these sites, among them being in situ precipitation ofCa2 with potassium antimonate. The ideal probe should retain the cell’s in vivo Ca2 distribution, maximize its detection, and minimize interferenee from other reacting species. Realistically speaking, few, if any, techniques in science match up to their ideal: limitations and dangers of artifact abound, and histoehemistry holds no exception. Use of antimonate has received its share of criticism, and, indeed, the variety of eations reported to precipitate with antimonate could easily lead one to conclude that specificity for Ca2 is not possible with the reaction. However, a closer look at the literature reveals that “antimonate precipitation” does not specify a unique procedure, but rather encompasses a bewildering array of variations. A survey of results obtained by others using different buffers, pH’s, antimonate concentrations, fixatives, and tissue pretreatments, as well as our own experience in handling the reagent, indicates that reaction parameters strongly influence retention of and precipitation of physiological cations relative to each other. Thus, while originally proposed and used as a means of loealizing Na (40), antimonate’s use recently has been almost exclusively in studies involving Ca2 localization. As elaborated in this review, careful choice of reaction conditions can make the antimonate technique highly selective for Ca2 in comparison to the other cations that are capable of precipitation. Also, other variations on the antimonate reaction, while not so specific for Ca2 , can be used in conjunction with analytical techniques such as X-ray analysis or chelator treatments to ascertain which of the deposits formed contain Ca2 . By means of several different antimonate procedures, coupled thus with deposit analysis, previous studies have localized Ca2 in a wide variety of tissue and cell types, and cumulatively have revealed Ca2 in nearly every type of membranous organelle, as well as in association with some nonmembranous cellular components (Table 1 ). We believe that a discussion of some parameters of antimonate precipitation is instructive for those considering its use, as well as for those trying to understand results obtained with it in the past. When comparing results obtained in various laboratories, it is often difficult to pinpoint the influence exerted by any single parameter of the technique, since even the most similar protocols usually differ from each other in several details. While we have tried to sort these out as much as possible, there are substantial areas ofunavoidable overlap with material discussed in other sections. In these eases, the reader is requested to cross-refer to appropriate sections for a more detailed analysis of other influencing factors. We hope this cxercise provides evidence that it is possible to employ antimonate as a selective electron microscopic histoehemical stain for localization of exchangeable cellular Ca2 and that, in spite of inevitable limitations, it is a useful tool for exploring Ca2 regulation.