scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Chinese Translation)

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors argue that rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them, and describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative.
Abstract
What makes organizations so similar? We contend that the engine of rationalization and bureaucratization has moved from the competitive marketplace to the state and the professions. Once a set of organizations emerges as a field, a paradox arises: rational actors make their organizations increasingly similar as they try to change them. We describe three isomorphic processes-coercive, mimetic, and normative—leading to this outcome. We then specify hypotheses about the impact of resource centralization and dependency, goal ambiguity and technical uncertainty, and professionalization and structuration on isomorphic change. Finally, we suggest implications for theories of organizations and social change.

read more

Citations
More filters

Relationship Between Institutional Pressures And Environmental Management Accounting Adoption With Special Reference To Small And Medium Manufacturing Entities In Anuradhapura District

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between institutional pressures and environmental management accounting (EMA) adoption level by applying new institutional sociology perspective and found that coercive isomorphism, normative pressures and mimetic processes are significant and moderate positively influence for the adoption of EMA.
Journal Article

The strategic management of sudden changes in the competitive environment: The case of the French dairy industry

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the sudden change in regulation the dairy industry experienced in 1984 (i.e., the restriction of raw materials by the fixing of milk quotas in 1984).
Dissertation

Operational auditing within Australian internal audit departments: Developing a framework

Elnaz Vafaei
TL;DR: In this article, the authors draw on international research into the practice of operational auditing and apply an agency and institutional theory perspective in the critical analysis of the published literature to generate new insights as to what are the problematic factors causing the theory practice gap.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches

TL;DR: This article synthesize the large but diverse literature on organizational legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches, and identify three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based upon normative approval; and cognitive, according to comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts

TL;DR: In this paper, a theory of stakeholder identification and saliency based on stakeholders possessing one or more of three relationship attributes (power, legitimacy, and urgency) is proposed, and a typology of stakeholders, propositions concerning their saliency to managers of the firm, and research and management implications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Strategic responses to institutional processes

TL;DR: The authors applied the convergent insights of institutional and resource dependence perspectives to the prediction of strategic responses to institutional processes, and proposed a typology of strategies that vary in active organizational resistance from passive conformity to proactive manipulation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: This article conducted a meta-analysis of 52 studies and found that corporate virtue in the form of social responsibility and, to a lesser extent, environmental responsibility is likely to pay off, although the operationalizations of CSP and CFP also moderate the positive association.
Journal ArticleDOI

Structural Inertia and Organizational Change

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider structural inertia in organizational populations as an outcome of an ecological-evolutionary process and define structural inertia as a correspondence between a class of organizations and their environments.
Related Papers (5)