The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics
Citations
8,699 citations
Cites background or methods from "The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Spec..."
...At 3 hPa, JRA-55 and ERA-Interim show remarkable agreement throughout the period while the marked drop in MERRA-2 temperature in 2004 is an artefact known to be related to the assimilation of Aura MSL temperature profiles (Gelaro et al., 2017; Long et al., 2017)....
[...]
...Long-term variations from ERA5 are generally closer to those from GPCC and GPCP than are those from ERA-Interim and JRA-55....
[...]
...Agreement is lower overall between JRA-55 and the four other datasets for the same reason already mentioned in the previous paragraph (no direct ozone DA)....
[...]
..., 2017) from the NASA GMAO, JRA-55 (Kobayashi et al., 2015) produced by the JMA and CFSR (version 2) produced by NCEP (Saha et al....
[...]
...Beyond ECMWF, several groups produce global atmospheric reanalyses and the most recent products are the MERRA-2 reanalysis (Gelaro et al., 2017) from the NASA GMAO, JRA-55 (Kobayashi et al., 2015) produced by the JMA and CFSR (version 2) produced by NCEP (Saha et al., 2014)....
[...]
4,524 citations
Cites background from "The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Spec..."
...…and the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) provide a rich ensemble of climate data products beginning more or less with the period of regular conventional and satellite observations in themid to late twentieth century (Saha et al. 2010; Dee et al. 2011; Rienecker et al. 2011; Kobayashi et al. 2015)....
[...]
1,764 citations
Cites background or methods from "The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Spec..."
...The combination of CRU monthly data with 6-hourly forcing from JRA-55 (Kobayashi et al., 2015) is performed with methodology used in previous years (Viovy, 2016) adapted to the specifics of the JRA-55 data....
[...]
...The DGVM model runs were forced by either the merged monthly Climate Research Unit (CRU) and 6-hourly Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) data set or by the monthly CRU data set, both providing observation-based temperature, precipitation, and incoming surface radiation on a 0.5◦× 0.5◦ grid and updated to 2019 (Harris and Jones, 2019; Harris et al., 2020)....
[...]
...h See Zaehle and Friend (2010) and Krinner et al. (2005). i See also Woodward and Lomas (2004). j See also Ito and Inatomi (2012)....
[...]
...h See Zaehle and Friend (2010) and Krinner et al. (2005). i See also Woodward and Lomas (2004)....
[...]
1,689 citations
1,458 citations
Cites methods from "The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Spec..."
...The DGVM model runs were forced by either the merged monthly CRU and 6-hourly JRA-55 data set or by the monthly CRU data set, both providing observation-based temperature, precipitation, and incoming surface radiation on a 0.5◦× 0.5◦ grid and updated to 2017 (Harris et al., 2014)....
[...]
...The combination of CRU monthly data with 6-hourly forcing is updated this year from NCEP to JRA-55 (Kobayashi et al., 2015), adapting the methodology used in previous years (Viovy, 2016) to the specifics of the JRA-55 data....
[...]
...MIROC Saeki and Patra (2017) Not applicable (not used in 2017). a The forcing for all DGVMs has been updated from CRUNCEP to CRU–JRA. b To account for the differences between the derivation of shortwave radiation (SWRAD) from CRU cloudiness and SWRAD from CRU–JRA-55, the photosynthesis scaling parameter αa was modified (−15...
[...]
References
28,145 citations
22,055 citations
7,110 citations
7,004 citations
4,951 citations