scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

The knowledge-creating company

01 Jan 2008-
TL;DR: Nonaka and Takeuchi as discussed by the authors argue that there are two types of knowledge: explicit knowledge, contained in manuals and procedures, and tacit knowledge, learned only by experience, and communicated only indirectly, through metaphor and analogy.
Abstract: How have Japanese companies become world leaders in the automotive and electronics industries, among others? What is the secret of their success? Two leading Japanese business experts, Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi, are the first to tie the success of Japanese companies to their ability to create new knowledge and use it to produce successful products and technologies. In The Knowledge-Creating Company, Nonaka and Takeuchi provide an inside look at how Japanese companies go about creating this new knowledge organizationally. The authors point out that there are two types of knowledge: explicit knowledge, contained in manuals and procedures, and tacit knowledge, learned only by experience, and communicated only indirectly, through metaphor and analogy. U.S. managers focus on explicit knowledge. The Japanese, on the other hand, focus on tacit knowledge. And this, the authors argue, is the key to their success--the Japanese have learned how to transform tacit into explicit knowledge. To explain how this is done--and illuminate Japanese business practices as they do so--the authors range from Greek philosophy to Zen Buddhism, from classical economists to modern management gurus, illustrating the theory of organizational knowledge creation with case studies drawn from such firms as Honda, Canon, Matsushita, NEC, Nissan, 3M, GE, and even the U.S. Marines. For instance, using Matsushita's development of the Home Bakery (the world's first fully automated bread-baking machine for home use), they show how tacit knowledge can be converted to explicit knowledge: when the designers couldn't perfect the dough kneading mechanism, a software programmer apprenticed herself withthe master baker at Osaka International Hotel, gained a tacit understanding of kneading, and then conveyed this information to the engineers. In addition, the authors show that, to create knowledge, the best management style is neither top-down nor bottom-up, but rather what they call "middle-up-down," in which the middle managers form a bridge between the ideals of top management and the chaotic realities of the frontline. As we make the turn into the 21st century, a new society is emerging. Peter Drucker calls it the "knowledge society," one that is drastically different from the "industrial society," and one in which acquiring and applying knowledge will become key competitive factors. Nonaka and Takeuchi go a step further, arguing that creating knowledge will become the key to sustaining a competitive advantage in the future. Because the competitive environment and customer preferences changes constantly, knowledge perishes quickly. With The Knowledge-Creating Company, managers have at their fingertips years of insight from Japanese firms that reveal how to create knowledge continuously, and how to exploit it to make successful new products, services, and systems.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on the social and behavioral sciences in an endeavor to specify the nature and microfoundations of the capabilities necessary to sustain superior enterprise performance in an open economy with rapid innovation and globally dispersed sources of invention, innovation, and manufacturing capability.
Abstract: This paper draws on the social and behavioral sciences in an endeavor to specify the nature and microfoundations of the capabilities necessary to sustain superior enterprise performance in an open economy with rapid innovation and globally dispersed sources of invention, innovation, and manufacturing capability. Dynamic capabilities enable business enterprises to create, deploy, and protect the intangible assets that support superior long- run business performance. The microfoundations of dynamic capabilities—the distinct skills, processes, procedures, organizational structures, decision rules, and disciplines—which undergird enterprise-level sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capacities are difficult to develop and deploy. Enterprises with strong dynamic capabilities are intensely entrepreneurial. They not only adapt to business ecosystems, but also shape them through innovation and through collaboration with other enterprises, entities, and institutions. The framework advanced can help scholars understand the foundations of long-run enterprise success while helping managers delineate relevant strategic considerations and the priorities they must adopt to enhance enterprise performance and escape the zero profit tendency associated with operating in markets open to global competition. Copyright  2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

9,400 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review various literature streams to develop a comprehensive model that covers research into the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of organizational ambidexterity, defined as an organization's ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today's business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment.

2,207 citations


Cites background from "The knowledge-creating company"

  • ...The concept is later illustrated with case studies from Japanese and Western companies (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995)....

    [...]

  • ...Exceptions include Jansen et al. (2005a) who found that firms operating in dynamic competitive environments rely on contextual ambidexterity rather than developing spatially separated units....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of this article is to introduce and comment on the debate about organizational knowledge creation theory, and aim to help scholars make sense of this debate by synthesizing six fundamental questions on organizational knowledgecreation theory.
Abstract: Nonaka's paper [1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci.5(1) 14--37] contributed to the concepts of “tacit knowledge” and “knowledge conversion” in organization science. We present work that shaped the development of organizational knowledge creation theory and identify two premises upon which more than 15 years of extensive academic work has been conducted: (1) tacit and explicit knowledge can be conceptually distinguished along a continuum; (2) knowledge conversion explains, theoretically and empirically, the interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge. Recently, scholars have raised several issues regarding the understanding of tacit knowledge as well as the interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge in the theory. The purpose of this article is to introduce and comment on the debate about organizational knowledge creation theory. We aim to help scholars make sense of this debate by synthesizing six fundamental questions on organizational knowledge creation theory. Next, we seek to elaborate and advance the theory by responding to questions and incorporating new research. Finally, we discuss implications of our endeavor for organization science.

1,801 citations


Cites background from "The knowledge-creating company"

  • ...The authors analyzed in depth the case of the development of Matshushita’s bread-baking machine presented in Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995; see also Nonaka 1991)....

    [...]

  • ...Thus, since its introduction into organization science (e.g., Winter 1987; Nonaka 1991, 1994; Kogut and Zander 1992), “tacit knowledge” has come to serve two purposes: as a foundation of social practice and as a foundation for innovation....

    [...]

  • ...Third, knowledge is explicit and tacit along a continuum (Nonaka 1991, 1994)....

    [...]

  • ...…only to explain the nature of knowledge assets and strategies for managing them, but also to complement the knowledge-based view of the firm and the theory of dynamic capabilities by explaining the dynamic processes of organizational knowledge creation (Nonaka 1987, 1991, 1994; Nonaka et al. 2006)....

    [...]

  • ...In these processes, tacit and explicit knowledge mutually enhance each other towards increasing the capacity to act4 (Nonaka 1991, 1994; Nonaka and Takeuchi 1995)....

    [...]

BookDOI
19 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Fagerberg as mentioned in this paper pointed out that the more knowledge-intensive the economic activity, the more geographically clustered it tends to be, and that this tendency toward spatial concentration has become more marked over time, not less contradicts longstanding predictions that the increasing use of information and communication technologies would lead to the dispersal of innovative activity over g g p p p g Fagerberg / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Revised Proof 31.7.2004 5:38pm page 291
Abstract: There are two paradoxical characteristics of the contemporary global economy. First, innovative activity is not uniformly or randomly distributed across the geographical landscape. Indeed, the more knowledge-intensive the economic activity , the more geographically clustered it tends to be. The best examples include industries such as biotechnology or Wnancial services, which have become ever more tightly clustered in a small number of major centers, despite the attempts of many other places to attract or generate their own activities in these sectors. Second, this tendency toward spatial concentration has become more marked over time, not less contradicts longstanding predictions that the increasing use of information and communication technologies would lead to the dispersal of innovative activity over g g p p g Fagerberg / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Revised Proof 31.7.2004 5:38pm page 291

1,488 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the relationship between innovation and performance and asserted a positive relationship between organizational learning and both performance and innovation, and found that both variables contribute positively to business performance and that organizational learning affects innovation.

1,264 citations


Cites background from "The knowledge-creating company"

  • ...a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o...

    [...]

  • ...…the relationship between organizational learning and innovation (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990; Coombs and Hull, 1998; Hage, 1999; Hall and Andriani, 2003; Kogut and Zander, 1992; Leonard-Barton, 1999; Nonaka, 1991; Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Nooteboom, 1999; Sørensen and Stuart, 2000; Stata, 1989)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors draw on the social and behavioral sciences in an endeavor to specify the nature and microfoundations of the capabilities necessary to sustain superior enterprise performance in an open economy with rapid innovation and globally dispersed sources of invention, innovation, and manufacturing capability.
Abstract: This paper draws on the social and behavioral sciences in an endeavor to specify the nature and microfoundations of the capabilities necessary to sustain superior enterprise performance in an open economy with rapid innovation and globally dispersed sources of invention, innovation, and manufacturing capability. Dynamic capabilities enable business enterprises to create, deploy, and protect the intangible assets that support superior long- run business performance. The microfoundations of dynamic capabilities—the distinct skills, processes, procedures, organizational structures, decision rules, and disciplines—which undergird enterprise-level sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capacities are difficult to develop and deploy. Enterprises with strong dynamic capabilities are intensely entrepreneurial. They not only adapt to business ecosystems, but also shape them through innovation and through collaboration with other enterprises, entities, and institutions. The framework advanced can help scholars understand the foundations of long-run enterprise success while helping managers delineate relevant strategic considerations and the priorities they must adopt to enhance enterprise performance and escape the zero profit tendency associated with operating in markets open to global competition. Copyright  2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

9,400 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review various literature streams to develop a comprehensive model that covers research into the antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of organizational ambidexterity, defined as an organization's ability to be aligned and efficient in its management of today's business demands while simultaneously being adaptive to changes in the environment.

2,207 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The purpose of this article is to introduce and comment on the debate about organizational knowledge creation theory, and aim to help scholars make sense of this debate by synthesizing six fundamental questions on organizational knowledgecreation theory.
Abstract: Nonaka's paper [1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci.5(1) 14--37] contributed to the concepts of “tacit knowledge” and “knowledge conversion” in organization science. We present work that shaped the development of organizational knowledge creation theory and identify two premises upon which more than 15 years of extensive academic work has been conducted: (1) tacit and explicit knowledge can be conceptually distinguished along a continuum; (2) knowledge conversion explains, theoretically and empirically, the interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge. Recently, scholars have raised several issues regarding the understanding of tacit knowledge as well as the interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge in the theory. The purpose of this article is to introduce and comment on the debate about organizational knowledge creation theory. We aim to help scholars make sense of this debate by synthesizing six fundamental questions on organizational knowledge creation theory. Next, we seek to elaborate and advance the theory by responding to questions and incorporating new research. Finally, we discuss implications of our endeavor for organization science.

1,801 citations

BookDOI
19 Jan 2006
TL;DR: Fagerberg as mentioned in this paper pointed out that the more knowledge-intensive the economic activity, the more geographically clustered it tends to be, and that this tendency toward spatial concentration has become more marked over time, not less contradicts longstanding predictions that the increasing use of information and communication technologies would lead to the dispersal of innovative activity over g g p p p g Fagerberg / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Revised Proof 31.7.2004 5:38pm page 291
Abstract: There are two paradoxical characteristics of the contemporary global economy. First, innovative activity is not uniformly or randomly distributed across the geographical landscape. Indeed, the more knowledge-intensive the economic activity , the more geographically clustered it tends to be. The best examples include industries such as biotechnology or Wnancial services, which have become ever more tightly clustered in a small number of major centers, despite the attempts of many other places to attract or generate their own activities in these sectors. Second, this tendency toward spatial concentration has become more marked over time, not less contradicts longstanding predictions that the increasing use of information and communication technologies would lead to the dispersal of innovative activity over g g p p g Fagerberg / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Revised Proof 31.7.2004 5:38pm page 291

1,488 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored the relationship between innovation and performance and asserted a positive relationship between organizational learning and both performance and innovation, and found that both variables contribute positively to business performance and that organizational learning affects innovation.

1,264 citations