scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDissertationDOI

The laws will fall silent : Ex Parte Quirin, a troubling precedent for military commissions.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Luebel et al. as discussed by the authors argued that a pattern exists concerning civil liberties and national security in the United States during World War II that resulted in the Supreme Court's Ex Parte Quirin decision in 1942.
Abstract
THE LAWS WILL FALL SILENT: EX PARTE QUIRIN, A TROUBLING PRECEDENT FOR MILITARY COMMISSIONS" BRAD P. LUEBBERT APRIL 13 2010 For over two hundred years a major issue in the history of the United States is the contentious issue of military commissions. Military commissions are not new or specific to the United States, but the United States traces its first military commission to the trial of a British officer, Major John Andre in September 1780. This thesis is about the trial of Nazi saboteurs before a military commission and their battle before the United States Supreme Court. A fight pitting civil liberties and due process versus national security during the time of war and crisis in the United States during World War II that resulted in the Supreme Court's Ex Parte Quirin decision in 1942 which established a dangerous and troubling precedence. The Nazi saboteur case of July 1942 was not a snapshot in time but a precedent that the United States is dealing with at the present time. This thesis demonstrates that a pattern exists concerning civil liberties and national security in the United States. The federal government in times of war and crisis, restrict civil liberties in the name of national security, and only after the crisis passed, do policy makers acknowledge error. Ex parte Quirin is a reminder about the need for balance between rights and liberties in the context of war-time.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

The Military Commissions Act, Habeas Corpus, and the Geneva Conventions

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the constitutionality of both the habeas corpus and Geneva Convention provisions in the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) and conclude that Congress has the authority to decide that the United States will implement the Conventions through military regulations, congressional oversight of the military, criminal law, and diplomatic relations rather than through private judicial enforcement, and a fair reading of its intent in enacting the MCA is that it has exercised this authority.
Journal ArticleDOI

Military Tribunals and Presidential Power: American Revolution to the War on Terrorism: Fisher,: Louis Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 279 pp., Publication Date: February 2005

TL;DR: The history of Commentary has been studied extensively in the literature on American conservatism and neoconservatism as discussed by the authors, with a focus on the early years of the magazine and its relationship to the American Jewish Committee.
Posted Content

Doing Justice During Wartime: Why Military Tribunals Make Sense

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the question is not whether a military commission is a good or bad thing, but whether any adequate mechanism currently exists for prosecuting prisoners who end up in U.S. custody during the new terror war facing America and its allies.
References
More filters
Book

A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II

TL;DR: The war in Europe and North Africa 1940-43: from Stalingrad, to and from Tunis 9. The Home Front 10. Means of warfare: old and new 11. The war from the spring of 1943 to summer 1944 12. The assault on Germany from all sides 13. Tensions in both alliances 14. The halt on the European fronts as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Origins of the Petition of Right Reconsidered

TL;DR: In the case of the five knights' case as discussed by the authors, it was shown that the House of Commons passed resolutions which were an absolute denial of Charles I's right of discretionary imprisonment in any circumstances.
Journal ArticleDOI

The United States-Dakota War Trials: A Study in Military Injustice

TL;DR: In the largest mass execution in American history, nearly four hundred Dakota men were tried for murder, rape, and robbery between September 28 and November 3, 1862, in southwestern Minnesota.