scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The lighting environment, its metrology and non-visual responses

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In 2018, the International Council on Circadian and Neurophysiological Photometry (CIE S 026:2018) provided lighting professionals and field researchers in chronobiology with a method to characterize light exposures with respect to non-visual photoreception and responses as discussed by the authors.
Abstract
International standard CIE S 026:2018 provides lighting professionals and field researchers in chronobiology with a method to characterize light exposures with respect to non-visual photoreception and responses. This standard defines five spectral sensitivity functions that describe optical radiation for its ability to stimulate each of the five α-opic retinal photoreceptor classes that contribute to the non-visual effects of light in humans via intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). The CIE also recently published an open-access α-opic toolbox that calculates all the quantities and ratios of the α-opic metrology in the photometric, radiometric and photon systems, based on either a measured (user-defined) spectrum or selected illuminants (A, D65, E, FL11, LED-B3) built into the toolbox. For a wide variety of ecologically-valid conditions, the melanopsin-based photoreception of ipRGCs has been shown to account for the spectral sensitivity of non-visual responses, from shifting the timing of nocturnal sleep and melatonin secretion to regulating steady-state pupil diameter. Recent findings continue to confirm that the photopigment melanopsin also plays a role in visual responses, and that melanopsin-based photoreception may have a significant influence on brightness perception and aspects of spatial vision. Although knowledge concerning the extent to which rods and cones interact with ipRGCs in driving non-visual effects is still growing, a CIE position statement recently used melanopic equivalent daylight (D65) illuminance in preliminary guidance on applying "proper light at the proper time" to manipulate non-visual responses. Further guidance on this approach is awaited from the participants of the 2nd International Workshop on Circadian and Neurophysiological Photometry (in Manchester, August 2019). The new α-opic metrology of CIE S 026 enables traceable measurements and a formal, quantitative specification of personal light exposures, photic interventions and lighting designs. Here, we apply this metrology to everyday light sources including a natural daylight time series, a range of LED lighting products and, using the toobox, to a smartphone display screen. This collection of examples suggests ways in which variations in the melanopic content of light over the day can be adopted in strategies that use light to support human health and well-being.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting melatonin suppression by light in humans: Unifying photoreceptor‐based equivalent daylight illuminances, spectral composition, timing and duration of light exposure

TL;DR: The model provides initial and general guidance to lighting practitioners on how to combine spectrum, duration and amount of light exposure when controlling non‐visual responses to light, especially melatonin suppression.
Journal ArticleDOI

The interindividual variability of sleep timing and circadian phase in humans is influenced by daytime and evening light conditions

TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a mathematical model of the human circadian pacemaker to understand how light in the built environment changes the chronotype distribution in the population, and they showed that when individuals spend their days in relatively dim light conditions, this not only results in a later phase of their biological clock but also increases interindividual differences in circadian phase angle of entrainment and preferred sleep timing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Individual differences and diversity in human physiological responses to light

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors discuss the fundamentals and individual differences in the non-visual effects of light and propose a set of actions to improve their evidence database to be more diverse: understanding systematic bias in the evidence base, dedicated efforts to recruit more diverse participants, routine deposition and sharing of data, and development of data standards and reporting guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of Daytime Electric Light Exposure on Human Alertness and Higher Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: In this paper , a systematic review conducted on articles examining the effects of daytime electric light exposure on alertness and higher cognitive functions was conducted. But the relationship between light exposure and higher cognition was not as straightforward as the alerting effect.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock.

TL;DR: It is shown that retinal ganglion cells innervating the SCN are intrinsically photosensitive, and depolarized in response to light even when all synaptic input from rods and cones was blocked.
Journal ArticleDOI

Human photoreceptor topography

TL;DR: The total number of foveal cones is similar for eyes with widely varying peak cone density, consistent with the idea that the variability reflects differences in the lateral migration of photoreceptors during development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Light Suppresses Melatonin Secretion in Humans

TL;DR: Findings establish that the human response to light is qualitatively similar to that of other mammals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Action Spectrum for Melatonin Regulation in Humans: Evidence for a Novel Circadian Photoreceptor

TL;DR: The results suggest that, in humans, a single photopigment may be primarily responsible for melatonin suppression, and its peak absorbance appears to be distinct from that of rod and cone cellphotopigments for vision.
Related Papers (5)