The mean free path of electrons in metals
Summary (5 min read)
Introduction
- Because pedestrian crash rates remain lower than other collision types, surrogate measures such as traffic interactions are now used in road safety research to complement crash history.
- For recorded interactions (n=843), information was collected to characterize the behaviours of involved parties.
- A mixed-effect logit regression model was performed to assess the factors associated with interactions.
- Older adults were those more likely to be involved in an interaction event.
- Given the growing emphasis and adoption of active transportation in many cities, the number of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles during street crossings is likely to increase.
1. PEDESTRIANS CRASH RISK IN CITIES: WHAT TO MEASURE?
- A growing number of North American cities have been actively promoting nonmotorized transportation and developing road infrastructure to support the use of these travel modes.
- Crash statistics show that many unsafe conditions still exist for vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, partly because modern cities were (and are still) mostly built for cars [1-3].
- On the other hand, local pedestrian crashes can be considered “rare events,” at least from a statistical perspective [4, 5].
- As a result, surrogate measures such as traffic conflicts and interactions are increasingly used in road safety research as complementary to crash history [9, 10] in order to have a better portrait of the situation and plan road design accordingly.
1.1 Surrogate measures of crash risk: Traffic conflict techniques and interactions
- The concept of “traffic conflict techniques” was first proposed in the 1960s as a complementary approach to typical collision-based safety analysis.
- Those common pedestrian-vehicle conflicts, referred to as “interactions,” can be seen as part of the road safety continuum shown in the diamond-shaped representation proposed by several authors (see Figure 1) [6, 7, 12].
- Moreover, even when interactions do not lead to injuries, they may be symptomatic of environments that are not adapted to pedestrians.
- Studying interactions can provide insight into the initial circumstances that may lead to crashes (or not).
- It is even more important to have a better understanding of interactions involving the most vulnerable pedestrians, namely children and seniors.
1.2 Objectives
- This paper seeks to provide a better understanding of the individual and environmental determinants associated with the occurrence of interactions between pedestrians and other road users (cars and bikes, other) during pedestrian crossings at intersections.
- As a secondary objective, it seeks to explore differences in interaction characteristics when comparing observed children, adult and senior pedestrians.
- By providing findings related to these objectives, the authors seek to strengthen the research background on pedestrian interactions through an important observational study.
2. INDIVIDUAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF
- Individual and environmental determinants of pedestrian crashes are well known and have unfortunately changed very little in the past 25 years, especially in the Western hemisphere [17].
- Compared to the general population, ageing pedestrians are overrepresented in crashes compared to their relative proportion of the population [20, 21]; up to 50% of all injured pedestrians in OECD countries are seniors [2].
- The cognitive complexity of dealing with this added infrastructure (needing to look both ways more than once) was thought to cause this effect.
- The presence of vehicles parked at the curb revealed contradictory effects in different studies: while Tom and Granié [43] show that pedestrians display more cautious crossing behaviour when there are no parked vehicles nearby, Yannis et al. [44] found that the presence of illegally parked vehicles at mid-block crossings makes pedestrians more careful because of reduced line of sight.
- In terms of behaviours associated with the number of interactions, the work of Kaparias et al. [3] shed light on the fact that “there are no generic behavioural criteria that can be used to examine lower severity interactions in different traffic situations.”.
3. ANALYTICAL MODEL
- The relatively small number of research on pedestrian-car conflicts and interactions has typically collected data either through video (and post-collection coding grid) or direct observation of behaviours (3; 6; 13; 36; 42).
- In addition, they either focus on one specific age group (e.g. seniors) or do not compare age groups within their sample.
- Finally, their definition of “conflict” is fairly narrow, including only events under a specific threshold such as a short time-to-collision indicator or a small yielding distance.
- In order to assess the occurrence of interactions between pedestrians and other motorized road users as an outcome, the authors posit that information on the individual, behavioural and environmental characteristics as well as location of the crossing must be observed.
- The manner in which the authors organized these concepts around their objectives is presented in Figure 2.
4. METHODS
- 1 Observation site and data collection Child, adult and senior pedestrians were observed crossing as part of two road safety research projects on the association between street environment and pedestrian road risk (one targeting children and the other, seniors).
- Data collection was undertaken between May and November 2013 in five different cities in the province of Quebec, Canada: Montreal, Laval, Longueuil, Quebec City and Gatineau.
- Those cities were chosen for their representativeness of the North American urban form and for their involvement in walk-to-school programs.
- Observers were given a list of initial intersections within the vicinity of schools to observe children before and after school, but were allowed to move to other nearby locations if few adult and senior pedestrians were crossing there during the day.
- Teams of two observers (one for pedestrians, the other for interactions with vehicles) were positioned, one on each side of the street, slightly set back from the crossing to avoid contact with observed pedestrians (see Figure 3).
4.2 Street crossing environment characteristics
- As previously mentioned, the street crossing environment grid refers to the pedestrian crossing and surroundings at the curb.
- Three individual variables were retained here: age (estimated in 5 categories), gender and observed walking speed (categories from “very slow” to “running” when compared to an average adult speed) of the observed pedestrians (see Table 2).
- Therefore, interactions were recorded when the pedestrian’s path (blue line in Figure 3) and the driver’s path (red line) crossed while the pedestrian was still on the street (on the pavement, not curb).
- This definition recalls the one used by Kaparias et al. (3) in a shared-space context.
4.4 Statistical analyses
- The final database includes pedestrian crossing observations, interaction characteristics (if applicable) and crossing environment characteristics, including a unique ID for observation grouping by location.
- After providing descriptive bivariate analyses, a mixed-effect logit model was used to assess the correlates of interactions with other road users while crossing, accounting for the grouping of observations in selected crossing environments using a random effect [52].
- This model was computed in addition to a basic logistic regression model.
- Finally, Chi-squared tests were used on the interactions’ subset of data (n=843) to highlight significant associations between interaction characteristics and age group.
- All analyses were carried out using Stata 14.
5.1 Descriptive statistics of pedestrian observations and crossing sites
- Data collection resulted in 4,687 pedestrians observed at 278 crossing sites.
- As for children, only 17% of their sample was collected during summer months since most of the observation sites were near schools during school periods.
- Another hypothesis would be that seniors tend to cross more at intersections with traffic lights for a variety of reasons such as better trust in the ability to cross safely, as it was observed before [53].
- Lastly, a smaller number of observations were located near a bike path, located either directly at the crossing or at the intersection (21%) and a third of the observation had parked cars on one or both sides of the streets (Table 2).
5.3 Mixed-effect logit model
- To account for the grouping of observations by crossing sites, the authors modeled the binary variable of interactions (yes/no) in a mixed-effect logit model and compared the results to a simple multivariate logistic regression (see Table 3).
- Since nearly 30% of the variance in the logit model is explained by the grouping of observations in studied intersections, the authors can hypothesize that several of the significant results are now amalgamated in this coefficient (i.e.: the crossing site constant is also significant).
- Gender does not influence interaction probability in their models.
- The presence of four characteristics decreased the probability of having an interaction: when the crossing was on a one-way street, when crossing had a different surface material, when a bicycle path directly affected crossing and when a curb extension was present.
5.4 Behaviours during interactions and age difference
- Turning to an analysis of recorded interactions (n=843), Table 4 provides cross tabulations for the behavioural characteristics of interactions across age groups.
- Of the six variables the authors tested, five were significant associated, based on Chi-squared tests.
- Vehicle type was the only variable that was not significant.
- The 65 to 79 years old group were more frequently involved in interactions with vehicles at constant speed and in cases when the pedestrian was at fault, in a proportion similar to adults (17%).
6. DISCUSSION
- This study found that in more than 4,000 observed street crossings in a variety of different environments, interactions with other road users occurred in nearly 18% of cases.
- First, a majority of their observations were taken within school zones (mean distance of 105 meters between observed crossing and nearest elementary school) and during school period (83% of them outside summer time), which means that the road infrastructure, if it follows prescriptions, should be safer.
- Inversely, three variables were associated with fewer interactions: oneway streets, different crossing surface material, and presence of a bike path at the crossing.
- Given the similarities in the factors associated with vehicle-pedestrian interactions and those known to influence collisions occurrence and rate, interactions may be a reasonable proxy for potential collisions.
6.1 Limitations
- As with any field survey, limitations from the data gathered through observations exist.
- Such field observations are known to be more valid than other automatic traffic-conflict techniques, but they are also vulnerable to intra and inter-observer variability [8].
- Another example lies in the possibility that observers may have misreported more subjective variables such as walking speed and age, even though few categories were used.
- The data is therefore partially representative of all the possible time period a pedestrian can cross streets, such as at night or during the Winter.
- Also, nighttime is a source of insecurity both for children and seniors, leading them to go out less frequently than during daylight hours.
7. CONCLUSION
- The main objective of this paper was first to explore the relationship between individuals and crossing characteristics and interaction occurrence between pedestrians and other road users (mostly vehicles) and second, to see if these particular interactions led to different reactions and behaviors for pedestrians of different age groups.
- The authors unique data set of observations of street crossings in different urban road environments in Quebec, Canada is one of the strengths of this study.
- The authors results provide a better understanding of the interaction between pedestrians and vehicles in different crossing environments and for different age groups: Senior and child pedestrians were found to have very different interaction pattern compared to adults.
- This is where their results are the most valuable: adding to the knowledge of pedestrian-vehicle interactions.
- Such an approach can also help identify which engineering, urban design and enforcement programs are needed to ensure safe pedestrian crossings for all ages.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
3,454 citations
1,947 citations
1,581 citations
996 citations
937 citations
References
1,812 citations
[...]
517 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What is the effect of the process of drawing wires of these metals?
The process of drawing wires of these metals produces an amorphous layer which is not easily removed by annealing, but which, in Chambers’ experiments, was removed by electrolytic polishing.
Q3. What is the case of a thin wire in a longitudinal magnetic ®eld?
When the electric and magnetic ®elds are parallel, the magnetic force on the electrons is always perpendicular to the electric force; the authors can then regard the electric ®eld alone as producing a drift current in the usual way, and the magnetic ®eld simply as modifying the electronic trajectories.
Q4. What is the eective conductivity of a conductor?
The e ective conductivity ¼ is obtained by integrating the current density over the cross-sectional area S of the conductor, and the ratio of ¼ to the bulk conductivity ¼0 may be written in the compact form¼
Q5. What is the simplest way to determine the distribution function of the electrons?
The problem is essentially a one-dimensional one, and the distribution function of the electrons may be written in the formf ˆ f0 ‡ f1…v; z†; …8†where the function f1 which has to be determined depends on the space variables only through z.
Q6. What was the main purpose of the modern electron theory of metals?
The foundations of the modern electron theory of metals were laid at the beginning of the present century, when the existence of a gas of free electrons was postulated by Drude in order to explain the conducting properties of metals; the behaviour of the electrons was subsequently analysed by Lorentz by means of the statistical methods of the dynamical theory of gases.
Q7. What is the conductivity of thin wires in a longitudinal magnetic ®eld?
The conductivity of thin wires in a longitudinal magnetic ®eld MacDonald, at the time of his discovery of the e ect, correctly interpreted its physical origin, and in particular he explained the simple decrease in resistance which occurs in a wire in a longitudinal ®eld as being due to the lessened infuence of scattering at the walls of the wire when the electrons are forced to pursue spiral paths around the lines of force of the magnetic ®eld.
Q8. What is the distribution function of the electrons leaving each surface?
The distribution function of the electrons leaving each surface must then be independent of direction; equation (10) shows that this can only be satis®ed if the authors choose F…v† so that f1…v; 0† ˆ 0 for all v such that vz > 0 (that is, for electrons moving away from the surface z ˆ 0), and f1…v; a† ˆ 0 for all v such that vz < 0:
Q9. What is the obvious method to determine the free path in a metal?
The most obvious method is to use a thin ®lm or wire and to arrange that the free path is comparable in magnitude with the thickness or diameter of the specimen; the arti®cial limitation of the free path by the boundaries of the specimen causes an increase in the resistivity above its value in the bulk metal, and this may be used to deduce the ratio of free path to thickness or diameter.
Q10. What is the definition of the term sizee ect?
This term takes into account the non-uniform distribution in space of the conduction electrons which is characteristic of the sizee ect phenomena.
Q11. What is the limit of zero magnetic ®eld?
In the limit of zero magnetic ®eld … ˆ 0†, equation (54) for the conductivity reduces to equation (16), and (55) gives a corresponding expression for the Hall coe cient of a thin ®lm in a vanishingly small magnetic ®eld.
Q12. What is the advantage of using a magnetic ®eld?
The advantage of using a magnetic ®eld is that all the required information can be obtained from one specimen only, and it is not necessary to assume, as in zero-®eld experiments, that the free path in a thin specimen is the same as in a bulk specimen.
Q13. What are the probable errors for copper, silver, gold, and aluminium?
The values for copper, silver, gold, and tin were obtained by Chambers,{ and are subject to probable errors of about 5%; the values for mercury and aluminium have been deduced from Pippard’s measurements and have larger probable errors.
Q14. Why does the departure from theory in high ®elds interfere with the comparison between theory and?
The departure from theory in high ®elds is, in fact, due to the onset of the bulk e ect, but this does not interfere seriously with the comparison between theory and experiment.