scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain

Anne-Maree Kelly
- 01 May 2001 - 
- Vol. 18, Iss: 3, pp 205-207
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The minimal clinically significant difference (MCSD) in VAS pain score was defined as the mean difference between current and preceding scores when the subject reported “a little worse” or “ a little better” pain.
Abstract
Objective —To determine whether minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score varies according to the severity of pain reported. Method —Prospective descriptive study of adult patients in an urban emergency department (ED). On presentation to the ED, patients marked the level of their pain on a 100 mm, non-hatched VAS scale. At 20 minute intervals thereafter they were asked to give a verbal categorical rating of their pain as “a lot better”, “a little better”, “much the same”, “a little worse” or “much worse” and to mark the level of pain on a VAS scale of the same type as used previously. It was pre-defined that patients with VAS pain scores of 30 mm or less would be categorised as having mild pain, those with scores of 70 mm or more were categorised as having severe pain and those from 31 mm to 69 mm, moderate pain. The minimal clinically significant difference (MCSD) in VAS pain score was defined as the mean difference between current and preceding scores when the subject reported “a little worse” or “a little better” pain. Results —156 patients were enrolled in the study, yielding 88 evaluable comparisons where pain was rated as “a little better” or “a little worse”. The MCSD in VAS score in the group overall was 12 mm (95%CI 9 mm to 15 mm). MCSD in VAS score for the “mild pain” group was 11 mm (95%CI 4 mm to 18 mm), for the “moderate pain” group 14 mm (95%CI 10 mm to 18 mm) and for the severe pain group, 10 mm (95%CI 6 mm to 14 mm). There is no statistical difference between the MCSD in VAS score between the severity groups. Conclusions —The MCSD in VAS pain score does not differ with the severity of pain being experienced.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

TL;DR: A consensus meeting was convened by the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) to provide recommendations for interpreting clinical importance of treatment outcomes in clinical trials of the efficacy and effectiveness of chronic pain treatments as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validation of a Verbally Administered Numerical Rating Scale of Acute Pain for Use in the Emergency Department

TL;DR: The findings suggest that the verbally administered NRS can be substituted for the VAS in acute pain measurement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Pain assessment

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors have discussed the risk factors for the development of chronic pain in patients with problems of the back, and a recommendation for a minimum as well as for a more comprehensive pain assessment is given.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?

TL;DR: All three scales are valid, reliable and appropriate for use in clinical practice, although the VAS is more difficulties than the others, and for general purposes the NRS has good sensitivity and generates data that can be analysed for audit purposes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state.

TL;DR: Analgesic interventions that provide a change of 10 for the 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) signify a clinically important improvement or deterioration, and a VAS of 33 or less signifies acceptable pain control (i.e. a responder), after surgery.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Graphic representation of pain.

TL;DR: Most patients could readily use visual analogue and graphic rating scales despite having no previous experience and use of these scales is the best available method for measuring pain or pain relief.
Journal ArticleDOI

The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?

TL;DR: The results indicate that if a patient records a baseline VAS score in excess of 30 mm they would probably have recorded at least moderate pain on a 4‐point categorical scale.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysis of statistical tests to compare visual analog scale measurements among groups.

TL;DR: It is concluded that t and ANOVA, without an accompanying arcsin transformation, are good tests to find differences in VAS measurements among groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Clinical Versus Statistical Significance in the Assessment of Pain Relief

TL;DR: Abstract [Todd KH: Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief]; Ann Emerg Med April 1996;27:439-441.
Related Papers (5)