scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Posted Content

The Mismanagement of Talent: Employability and Jobs in the Knowledge Economy

01 Jan 2004-Research Papers in Economics (Oxford University Press)-
TL;DR: The Mismanagement of Talent as mentioned in this paper argues that talent is being mismanaged by employers that have yet to come to terms with the realities and possibilities of mass higher education and argues that some graduates are playing 'the game' to win a competitive advantage and what really happens in the selection events of leading-edge employers.
Abstract: The knowledge economy conjures a world of smart people, in smart jobs, doing smart things, in smart ways, for smart money, a world increasingly open to all rather than a few. Glossy corporate brochures present a future in challenging, exciting and financially rewarding jobs for the winners in the competition for fast track management appointments. They also convey an image of enlightened employers actively seeking to diversify their talent pool, reflected in their approach to identifying, hiring and retaining outstanding talent. We are told that the challenge confronting governments around the world is to enhance the employability of the workforce. Every effort must be made to expand access to higher education, dismantle barriers to talent regardless of social circumstances, gender, or skin colour, and to harness human creativity and enterprise to meet the demands of the new economy. The Mismanagement of Talent comes to a different conclusion. Those leaving the world of mass higher education find themselves in a scramble for jobs with rising stakes for the winners and losers. The Mismanagement of Talent examines what determines the outcome of this race when a degree loses its badge of distinction. It shows how some graduates are playing 'the game' to win a competitive advantage and what really happens in the selection events of leading-edge employers. It also argues that talent is being mismanaged by employers that have yet to come to terms with the realities and possibilities of mass higher education. The Mismanagement of Talent will be thought-provoking and controversial reading for those involved in the recruitment of graduates, and those concerned with the way knowledge-based firms recruit and the impact of higher education policy: Professionals working in university careers services, HRM, training, or recruitment generally; Researchers, academics, or students of Business and Management, Human Resource Management, Public Policy, Education, or Sociology; and Job candidates themselves - the 'players' and 'purists' described in the book.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a qualitative study with 53 final-year undergraduate students in a pre-1992 university showed that students perceive their academic qualifications as having a declining role in shaping their employment outcomes in what is perceived to be a congested and competitive graduate labour market.
Abstract: The UK Government is calling upon higher education students to see their learning as an investment that will give them direct benefits in the labour market. At the same time, the relationship between educational credentials and their returns in labour market has been changing in recent times. Based on a qualitative study with 53 final‐year undergraduate students in a pre‐1992 university, this article examines the way higher education students understand the role of their educational credentials in relation to their future employability. It shows that students perceive their academic qualifications as having a declining role in shaping their employment outcomes in what is perceived to be a congested and competitive graduate labour market. While academic credentials are still seen as a significant dimension of their employability, students increasingly see the need to add value to them in order to gain an advantage in the labour market.

628 citations


Cites background from "The Mismanagement of Talent: Employ..."

  • ...The evidence clearly shows that employers play an active role in reinforcing patterns of labour market inequality amongst different graduates (Harvey, Moon and Geall 1997; Brown and Hesketh 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...The task facing students is that of gaining a positional advantage in a competitive labour market where employers are placing increasingly less emphasis on academic credentials (Brown and Hesketh 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...They may be further mirroring wider cultural tensions among the expanding middle class who are finding it increasingly difficult to subscribe to traditional notions of merit as a way of winning positional advantage (Ball 2002; Brown and Hesketh 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...In their study of graduate recruitment, Brown and Hesketh (2004) have shown the declining importance employers are attaching to academic credentials, and the increasing importance instead given to personal attributes and skills....

    [...]

  • ...The evidence suggests that higher education students are using the discourse of experience or, what Brown and Hesketh (2004) term the ‘economy of experience’, in understanding their future employability and labour market outcomes....

    [...]

Book
01 Apr 2011
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on student mobility, migration, and the internationalization of higher education, drawing on case studies of mobile students from East Asia, mainland Europe and the UK, and discuss the implications of their movement for contemporary higher education and for our understanding of migration more generally.
Abstract: The last ten years have seen the deepening and expansion of the process of internationalization in relation to higher education. This process is multi-faceted and has included the development of education 'brands' as governments and educational institutions become increasingly entrepreneurial in their approach to higher education. The number of students who choose to study abroad has also increased considerably. Although there is a growing academic literature on the internationalization of higher education, students' own perspectives - on their motivations, objectives and experiences - are sorely lacking. Student Mobilities, Migration and the Internationalization of Higher Education is intended to address this gap. Its strong empirical focus, drawing on case studies of mobile students from East Asia, mainland Europe and the UK, helps to develop an in-depth understanding of both the commonalities and differences in the experiences of students from different parts of the world who choose to move abroad to pursue a higher education. It discusses the implications of their movement for contemporary higher education and for our understanding of migration more generally.

479 citations


Cites background from "The Mismanagement of Talent: Employ..."

  • ...These have included: going on to higher levels of study (by enrolling for a master’s degree, or some other form of postgraduate qualification); taking up internships, work experience and/or relevant extra-curricular activities; and gaining entry to high status universities (Brooks and Everett, 2009; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; Reay et al., 2005)....

    [...]

  • ...English provides students with a ‘positional advantage’ in their home labour market (Brown and Hesketh, 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...ing their ‘positional advantage’ within a saturated graduate labour market (Arthur and Rousseau, 1996; Brown and Hesketh, 2004; Brown and Lauder, 2006) through the acquisition of international credentials....

    [...]

  • ...A common theme within the academic literature on higher education in many countries of the world is the congested nature of the graduate labour market and the increasingly protracted character of transitions from university into work (Brown and Hesketh, 2004)....

    [...]

  • ..., 2005); engaging in a range of work-relevant extra-curricular activities (Brooks, 2007b; Brown and Hesketh, 2004); and, on completion of a first degree, pursuing postgraduate qualifications (Brooks and Everett, 2009)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In a context of considerable changes in the labour market and higher education sector in the UK, a discourse of employability has become increasingly dominant as mentioned in this paper, and universities are urged to ensure that...
Abstract: In a context of considerable changes in the labour market and higher education sector in the UK, a discourse of employability has become increasingly dominant. Universities are urged to ensure that...

420 citations


Cites background from "The Mismanagement of Talent: Employ..."

  • ...One exception is the research by Brown and Hesketh (2004) in which 60 graduate applicants to fast-track management programmes were interviewed....

    [...]

  • ...…and to the ways in which opportunities for graduates are framed, for example by gender, ‘race’ and social class (Bourdieu & Passeron, 1964, 1970; Connor et al., 1997, 2003, 2004; Elias et al., 1999; Morley, 2001; Blasko et al., 2002; Brown, 2003; Brown & Hesketh, 2004; Smetherham, 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...As noted by Brown and Hesketh (2004) amongst others, the recurrent use of the ‘employability’ word is not only a shift of terminology, but also a shift of discourses drawing on different explanatory frameworks of employment and different constructions of the worker....

    [...]

  • ...(1995, p. 112) Purcell and colleagues’ findings suggest that for some employers, a degree may now not represent anything more than a ‘threshold to requirement in addition to other evidence of suitability’ (2002, p. 10), a trend also noted by Brown and Hesketh (2004)....

    [...]

  • ...…groups that face additional difficulties in terms of employment-related outcomes to HE (Elias et al., 1999; Blasko, 2002; Purcell, 2002) and employers continue to target their graduate recruitment activities at old, elite institutions (AGR, 1999; Leathwood & Hutchings, 2003; Brown & Hesketh, 2004)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors provide an overview of some of the dominant empirical and conceptual themes in the area of graduate employment and employability over the past decade, and argue for a broader understanding of employability than that offered by policymakers.

403 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine three competing perspectives on employability, termed here as the "possessive", "positioning" and "processual" approaches, and argue that the first of these, based on notions of skills and attributes, dominates the policy and practice discourse but is deeply flawed in theoretical terms.
Abstract: Employability has become, and is likely to continue to be, a major issue for a variety of stakeholders in higher education. The article examines three competing perspectives on employability, termed here as the ‘possessive’, ‘positioning’ and ‘processual’ approaches. The first of these, based on notions of skills and attributes, dominates the policy and practice discourse but, it is argued, is deeply flawed in theoretical terms. The second perspective, based on social positioning theory, is shown to be more in accord with the evidence of employment outcomes, but tends, arguably, to lead to a ‘counsel of despair’. The processual perspective is then presented, particularly focusing on the concept of graduate identity. The article argues that this is theoretically robust, is supported by empirical evidence, and provides a sound basis for curriculum and other forms of intervention to enhance graduate employability.

399 citations


Cites methods from "The Mismanagement of Talent: Employ..."

  • ...In a later study, Brown and Hesketh (2004) draw on this previous work, using pos-...

    [...]