scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The one particle inclusive differential cross section for heavy quark production in hadronic collisions

20 Nov 1989-Nuclear Physics (North-Holland)-Vol. 327, Iss: 1, pp 49-92
TL;DR: In this paper, the one-particle inclusive differential cross section for heavy quark production in hadronic collisions, including the O(αS3) radiative corrections, is presented.
About: This article is published in Nuclear Physics.The article was published on 1989-11-20. It has received 531 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Charm quark & Quark.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: MadGraph5 aMC@NLO as discussed by the authors is a computer program capable of handling all these computations, including parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged, in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation and human intervention limited to input physics quantities.
Abstract: We discuss the theoretical bases that underpin the automation of the computations of tree-level and next-to-leading order cross sections, of their matching to parton shower simulations, and of the merging of matched samples that differ by light-parton multiplicities. We present a computer program, MadGraph5 aMC@NLO, capable of handling all these computations — parton-level fixed order, shower-matched, merged — in a unified framework whose defining features are flexibility, high level of parallelisation, and human intervention limited to input physics quantities. We demonstrate the potential of the program by presenting selected phenomenological applications relevant to the LHC and to a 1-TeV e + e − collider. While next-to-leading order results are restricted to QCD corrections to SM processes in the first public version, we show that from the user viewpoint no changes have to be expected in the case of corrections due to any given renormalisable Lagrangian, and that the implementation of these are well under way.

6,509 citations


Cites methods from "The one particle inclusive differen..."

  • ...Calculations of cross sections at the NLO for this class of processes are available in the literature as well as in public codes: from the seminal results for the hadroproduction of a heavy quark pair [288–292], to their NLO+PS implementation in MC@NLO [172] and POWHEG [293], to tt̄j [294] (also including top decays [257,295] and parton shower effects [296,297]), to the computation of tt̄jj [298]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: A golden age for heavy-quarkonium physics dawned a decade ago, initiated by the confluence of exciting advances in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and an explosion of related experimental activity. The early years of this period were chronicled in the Quarkonium Working Group (QWG) CERN Yellow Report (YR) in 2004, which presented a comprehensive review of the status of the field at that time and provided specific recommendations for further progress. However, the broad spectrum of subsequent breakthroughs, surprises, and continuing puzzles could only be partially anticipated. Since the release of the YR, the BESII program concluded only to give birth to BESIII; the B-factories and CLEO-c flourished; quarkonium production and polarization measurements at HERA and the Tevatron matured; and heavy-ion collisions at RHIC have opened a window on the deconfinement regime. All these experiments leave legacies of quality, precision, and unsolved mysteries for quarkonium physics, and therefore beg for continuing investigations at BESIII, the LHC, RHIC, FAIR, the Super Flavor and/or Tau-Charm factories, JLab, the ILC, and beyond. The list of newly found conventional states expanded to include h(c)(1P), chi(c2)(2P), B-c(+), and eta(b)(1S). In addition, the unexpected and still-fascinating X(3872) has been joined by more than a dozen other charmonium- and bottomonium-like "XYZ" states that appear to lie outside the quark model. Many of these still need experimental confirmation. The plethora of new states unleashed a flood of theoretical investigations into new forms of matter such as quark-gluon hybrids, mesonic molecules, and tetraquarks. Measurements of the spectroscopy, decays, production, and in-medium behavior of c (c) over bar, b (b) over bar, and b (c) over bar bound states have been shown to validate some theoretical approaches to QCD and highlight lack of quantitative success for others. Lattice QCD has grown from a tool with computational possibilities to an industrial-strength effort now dependent more on insight and innovation than pure computational power. New effective field theories for the description of quarkonium in different regimes have been developed and brought to a high degree of sophistication, thus enabling precise and solid theoretical predictions. Many expected decays and transitions have either been measured with precision or for the first time, but the confusing patterns of decays, both above and below open-flavor thresholds, endure and have deepened. The intriguing details of quarkonium suppression in heavy-ion collisions that have emerged from RHIC have elevated the importance of separating hot- and cold-nuclear-matter effects in quark-gluon plasma studies. This review systematically addresses all these matters and concludes by prioritizing directions for ongoing and future efforts.

1,354 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented the QCD corrections to the fusion cross sections for the Higgs boson in the Standard Model, and for the neutral Higgs particles in the minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model.

1,026 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
G. L. Bayatian, S. Chatrchyan, G. Hmayakyan, Albert M. Sirunyan  +2060 moreInstitutions (143)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a detailed analysis of the performance of the Large Hadron Collider (CMS) at 14 TeV and compare it with the state-of-the-art analytical tools.
Abstract: CMS is a general purpose experiment, designed to study the physics of pp collisions at 14 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). It currently involves more than 2000 physicists from more than 150 institutes and 37 countries. The LHC will provide extraordinary opportunities for particle physics based on its unprecedented collision energy and luminosity when it begins operation in 2007. The principal aim of this report is to present the strategy of CMS to explore the rich physics programme offered by the LHC. This volume demonstrates the physics capability of the CMS experiment. The prime goals of CMS are to explore physics at the TeV scale and to study the mechanism of electroweak symmetry breaking--through the discovery of the Higgs particle or otherwise. To carry out this task, CMS must be prepared to search for new particles, such as the Higgs boson or supersymmetric partners of the Standard Model particles, from the start-up of the LHC since new physics at the TeV scale may manifest itself with modest data samples of the order of a few fb−1 or less. The analysis tools that have been developed are applied to study in great detail and with all the methodology of performing an analysis on CMS data specific benchmark processes upon which to gauge the performance of CMS. These processes cover several Higgs boson decay channels, the production and decay of new particles such as Z' and supersymmetric particles, Bs production and processes in heavy ion collisions. The simulation of these benchmark processes includes subtle effects such as possible detector miscalibration and misalignment. Besides these benchmark processes, the physics reach of CMS is studied for a large number of signatures arising in the Standard Model and also in theories beyond the Standard Model for integrated luminosities ranging from 1 fb−1 to 30 fb−1. The Standard Model processes include QCD, B-physics, diffraction, detailed studies of the top quark properties, and electroweak physics topics such as the W and Z0 boson properties. The production and decay of the Higgs particle is studied for many observable decays, and the precision with which the Higgs boson properties can be derived is determined. About ten different supersymmetry benchmark points are analysed using full simulation. The CMS discovery reach is evaluated in the SUSY parameter space covering a large variety of decay signatures. Furthermore, the discovery reach for a plethora of alternative models for new physics is explored, notably extra dimensions, new vector boson high mass states, little Higgs models, technicolour and others. Methods to discriminate between models have been investigated. This report is organized as follows. Chapter 1, the Introduction, describes the context of this document. Chapters 2-6 describe examples of full analyses, with photons, electrons, muons, jets, missing ET, B-mesons and τ's, and for quarkonia in heavy ion collisions. Chapters 7-15 describe the physics reach for Standard Model processes, Higgs discovery and searches for new physics beyond the Standard Model

973 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sergey Alekhin, Wolfgang Altmannshofer1, Takehiko Asaka2, Brian Batell3, Fedor Bezrukov4, Kyrylo Bondarenko5, Alexey Boyarsky5, Ki-Young Choi6, Cristóbal Corral7, Nathaniel Craig8, David Curtin9, Sacha Davidson10, Sacha Davidson11, André de Gouvêa12, Stefano Dell'Oro, Patrick deNiverville13, P. S. Bhupal Dev14, Herbi K. Dreiner15, Marco Drewes16, Shintaro Eijima17, Rouven Essig18, Anthony Fradette13, Björn Garbrecht16, Belen Gavela19, Gian F. Giudice3, Mark D. Goodsell20, Mark D. Goodsell21, Dmitry Gorbunov22, Stefania Gori1, Christophe Grojean23, Alberto Guffanti24, Thomas Hambye25, Steen Honoré Hansen24, Juan Carlos Helo26, Juan Carlos Helo7, Pilar Hernández27, Alejandro Ibarra16, Artem Ivashko28, Artem Ivashko5, Eder Izaguirre1, Joerg Jaeckel29, Yu Seon Jeong30, Felix Kahlhoefer, Yonatan Kahn31, Andrey Katz3, Andrey Katz32, Andrey Katz33, Choong Sun Kim30, Sergey Kovalenko7, Gordan Krnjaic1, Valery E. Lyubovitskij34, Valery E. Lyubovitskij35, Valery E. Lyubovitskij36, Simone Marcocci, Matthew McCullough3, David McKeen37, Guenakh Mitselmakher38, Sven Moch39, Rabindra N. Mohapatra9, David E. Morrissey40, Maksym Ovchynnikov28, Emmanuel A. Paschos, Apostolos Pilaftsis14, Maxim Pospelov1, Maxim Pospelov13, Mary Hall Reno41, Andreas Ringwald, Adam Ritz13, Leszek Roszkowski, Valery Rubakov, Oleg Ruchayskiy24, Oleg Ruchayskiy17, Ingo Schienbein42, Daniel Schmeier15, Kai Schmidt-Hoberg, Pedro Schwaller3, Goran Senjanovic43, Osamu Seto44, Mikhail Shaposhnikov17, Lesya Shchutska38, J. Shelton45, Robert Shrock18, Brian Shuve1, Michael Spannowsky46, Andrew Spray47, Florian Staub3, Daniel Stolarski3, Matt Strassler32, Vladimir Tello, Francesco Tramontano48, Anurag Tripathi, Sean Tulin49, Francesco Vissani, Martin Wolfgang Winkler15, Kathryn M. Zurek50, Kathryn M. Zurek51 
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics1, Niigata University2, CERN3, University of Connecticut4, Leiden University5, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute6, Federico Santa María Technical University7, University of California, Santa Barbara8, University of Maryland, College Park9, Claude Bernard University Lyon 110, University of Lyon11, Northwestern University12, University of Victoria13, University of Manchester14, University of Bonn15, Technische Universität München16, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne17, Stony Brook University18, Autonomous University of Madrid19, University of Paris20, Centre national de la recherche scientifique21, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology22, Autonomous University of Barcelona23, University of Copenhagen24, Université libre de Bruxelles25, University of La Serena26, University of Valencia27, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv28, Heidelberg University29, Yonsei University30, Princeton University31, Harvard University32, University of Geneva33, Tomsk State University34, University of Tübingen35, Tomsk Polytechnic University36, University of Washington37, University of Florida38, University of Hamburg39, TRIUMF40, University of Iowa41, University of Grenoble42, International Centre for Theoretical Physics43, Hokkai Gakuen University44, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign45, Durham University46, University of Melbourne47, University of Naples Federico II48, York University49, University of California, Berkeley50, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory51
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that the SHiP experiment has a unique potential to discover new physics and can directly probe a number of solutions of beyond the standard model puzzles, such as neutrino masses, baryon asymmetry of the Universe, dark matter, and inflation.
Abstract: This paper describes the physics case for a new fixed target facility at CERN SPS. The SHiP (search for hidden particles) experiment is intended to hunt for new physics in the largely unexplored domain of very weakly interacting particles with masses below the Fermi scale, inaccessible to the LHC experiments, and to study tau neutrino physics. The same proton beam setup can be used later to look for decays of tau-leptons with lepton flavour number non-conservation, $\tau \to 3\mu $ and to search for weakly-interacting sub-GeV dark matter candidates. We discuss the evidence for physics beyond the standard model and describe interactions between new particles and four different portals—scalars, vectors, fermions or axion-like particles. We discuss motivations for different models, manifesting themselves via these interactions, and how they can be probed with the SHiP experiment and present several case studies. The prospects to search for relatively light SUSY and composite particles at SHiP are also discussed. We demonstrate that the SHiP experiment has a unique potential to discover new physics and can directly probe a number of solutions of beyond the standard model puzzles, such as neutrino masses, baryon asymmetry of the Universe, dark matter, and inflation.

842 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the main body of predictions of the theory for deep-inleastic scattering on either unpolarized or polarized targets is re-obtained by a method which only makes use of the simplest tree diagrams and is entirely phrased in parton language with no reference to the conventional operator formalism.

4,692 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present the results of a full calculation of the QCD O(a$) radiative corrections to the total cross-aection for the production of a heavy quark pair.

802 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B.L. Combridge1, J. Kripfganz1, J. Ranft1
TL;DR: The predictions of a QCD-based hardscattering model for large pT hadronic processes are investigated in this paper, where all contributions in lowest order are considered and the QCD predictions lie below the data but already come very close at the highest ISR energy.

350 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
B.L. Combridge1
TL;DR: In this article, a perturbative, non-scaling, QCD approach is used to calculate production cross sections for "naked" heavy flavour states in pp and p p collisions.

349 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the full O(αs3) QCD corrections to one particle inclusive cross section and jet production within a small opening angle δ at large transverse momenta for all partonic subprocesses were evaluated.

297 citations