scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The Other Side of Magic.

11 Jan 2017-Perspectives on Psychological Science (Perspect Psychol Sci)-Vol. 12, Iss: 1, pp 91-106
TL;DR: It is argued that perceptual and cognitive principles governing how humans experience hidden things and reason about them play a central role in many magic tricks, and how insights from perceptual psychology provide a framework for understanding why these tricks work so well.
Abstract: When magicians perform spectacles that seem to defy the laws of nature, they do so by manipulating psychological reality. Hence, the principles underlying the art of conjuring are potentially of interest to psychological science. Here, we argue that perceptual and cognitive principles governing how humans experience hidden things and reason about them play a central role in many magic tricks. Different from tricks based on many other forms of misdirection, which require considerable skill on the part of the magician, many elements of these tricks are essentially self-working because they rely on automatic perceptual and cognitive processes. Since these processes are not directly observable, even experienced magicians may be oblivious to their central role in creating strong magical experiences and tricks that are almost impossible to debunk, even after repeated presentations. We delineate how insights from perceptual psychology provide a framework for understanding why these tricks work so well. Conversely, we argue that studying magic tricks that work much better than one intuitively would believe provides a promising heuristic for charting unexplored aspects of perception and cognition.

Summary (1 min read)

Introduction

  • Note that these experiences are quite compelling even though you know very well that there is no complete triangle (in panel c) or cross (in panel d) behind your thumb.
  • It is also interesting to consider that with tricks based on attentional misdirection, every sense of magic is lost once you know how the trick works.

Cognitive impenetrability

  • The only reason why the upper figures look white while the lower figures look black is that they are viewed in different contexts (Anderson & Winawer, 2005; see also Adelson, 2000 and Gilchrist et al., 1999 for similar demonstrations).
  • Some effects of learning and knowledge on their mental processing of occluded objects have been documented, (Vrins et al., 2009, Hazenberg et al., 2014, Hazenberg & van Lier, 2015), but it can be discussed whether these effects are part of what should be called amodal perception proper.
  • When people try to debunk a trick based on amodal perception, the cognitively impenetrable illusion (or visual fixedness) closes the door to the right solution even before any conscious problem-solving even starts.
  • Visual fixedness and the cognitive impenetrability of perceptual mechanisms may be regarded as an extreme form of this kind of generation of false assumptions that may be critical to the robustness and potency of many magic tricks.
  • Based on this reasoning, investigating the effect of repeated presentations of magic tricks on the spectators’ likelihood of figuring out the method could be a promising tool for elucidating the nature of the mechanisms underlying different kinds of magic tricks.

Summary and conclusions

  • The authors have argued that automatic perceptual and cognitive mechanisms governing how they experience and reason about hidden things – in particular those underlying the well-known phenomenon of amodal presence and the less well-known, but presumably intimately related phenomenon of amodal absence –play a central role in many magic tricks.
  • The authors have also argued the causal role of these mechanisms, which cannot be observed directly, is difficult to appreciate even for experienced magicians, and that it may therefore have been largely neglected in discussions of how magic works.
  • The authors have also suggested that the surprising discrepancy between the expected and the actual efficiency of many magical routines may serve as a tell-tale sign of interesting psychological effects that may help guide further research into the psychology of magic.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

For Review Only







 !
"#$"%!%
&
'#()!%
*+,-"./012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
#,7 012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
8 #,%012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
49$
' ,,%+ & &$ #,1&
!# 
1)$49$
!#$#, ,' 2#"

Perspectives on Psychological Science

For Review Only



 !
"#$#%&"$#'$
Page 1 of 44 Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
(

!!!)*$)
$!!+,!!$)!$
!!!!+,*$!$)!#
!#**!)))$!
!!+-!))!*!.$
!)!!/
*!$$!!$)!#!+!!
)!##!)!#$!
!!!)!*!)$#
)+)*!$!#)*
$))*!**+0#*$$)!!
*$!*$)$###)$!!
$)!!)!+
Page 2 of 44Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
1



 !!"#$%!%&#
2!!$!!!))
$)!)$!!$)+2))*)!*
!3!#4+!$!$!$
)!#%!'#)!$)
)*))**+5#$#)$
!$!!!$)!)!!
%&6789:67;9&$<=(8879>!&=)=
(8879=&$(8?9@+(8?')!!#
!!!)!!!!)#)
!$))!!+
@#$*!)!!!#$
%,)(88+6')$!#)
$!$!$))!!!
)%>(889&$@(8)
*)))!'+=!!)
%=AB=066C9#66C9=(88?')
.$)!!#$!*!)!!!$
)!$)!!!)!$
!+!)%>!=!667'*
Page 3 of 44 Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
D
!!$$!#E$
E$!)#)+<$
!*!$)$)!$)$!$!!#!!
)$!)$
%#(88('+@#$***!#)*
*!#+
@!!!$!$#$!#)!
)$!!!%&$+(8D'+2$!#!
!)*$))$#$.$
$)*##)+F!
)&$@F))0%(887'*$!!$
$*!!$#)!)
*+!!#*$)!$!#$#
!!$*##)$$*
!)*$)+
!))!!.$!)
!$.$!)$)+@)))
!$)$!!$#**$)
!!$/$#+<!!)#!!$*$
$)*G!H$H++!*
)!*!)+>!)!$!!!
#))#!*#!!)!$
$$#!$$*)+2))
$#)))#
!*!!))$$!!$!$
!!!)!!#!*+!)!!)
Page 4 of 44Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review provides a selective overview of experimental studies on predictive mechanisms in human vision for action and presents classic paradigms and novel approaches investigating mechanisms that underlie the prediction of events guiding eye and hand movements.
Abstract: Prediction allows humans and other animals to prepare for future interactions with their environment. This is important in our dynamically changing world that requires fast and accurate reactions to external events. Knowing when and where an event is likely to occur allows us to plan eye, hand, and body movements that are suitable for the circumstances. Predicting the sensory consequences of such movements helps to differentiate between self-produced and externally generated movements. In this review, we provide a selective overview of experimental studies on predictive mechanisms in human vision for action. We present classic paradigms and novel approaches investigating mechanisms that underlie the prediction of events guiding eye and hand movements.

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that gaze behavior in crowd navigation is task-dependent, and that not every fixation is strictly necessary for navigating crowds, and when explicitly tasked with seeking out potential social affordances, gaze is modulated as a result.
Abstract: Human crowds provide an interesting case for research on the perception of people. In this study, we investigate how visual information is acquired for (1) navigating human crowds and (2) seeking out social affordances in crowds by studying gaze behavior during human crowd navigation under different task instructions. Observers (n = 11) wore head-mounted eye-tracking glasses and walked two rounds through hallways containing walking crowds (n = 38) and static objects. For round one, observers were instructed to avoid collisions. For round two, observers furthermore had to indicate with a button press whether oncoming people made eye contact. Task performance (walking speed, absence of collisions) was similar across rounds. Fixation durations indicated that heads, bodies, objects, and walls maintained gaze comparably long. Only crowds in the distance maintained gaze relatively longer. We find no compelling evidence that human bodies and heads hold one’s gaze more than objects while navigating crowds. When eye contact was assessed, heads were fixated more often and for a total longer duration, which came at the cost of looking at bodies. We conclude that gaze behavior in crowd navigation is task-dependent, and that not every fixation is strictly necessary for navigating crowds. When explicitly tasked with seeking out potential social affordances, gaze is modulated as a result. We discuss our findings in the light of current theories and models of gaze behavior. Furthermore, we show that in a head-mounted eye-tracking study, a large degree of experimental control can be maintained while many degrees of freedom on the side of the observer remain.

17 citations


Cites background from "The Other Side of Magic."

  • ...A person’s gaze direction, for example, can hold valuable information regarding that person’s spatial locus of attention (Langton et al., 2000), a fact that is often exploited by magicians (e.g., Tatler et al. (2007) and Ekroll et al. (2017))....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.
Abstract: Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.

16 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new theory explaining the perception of partly occluded objects and illusory figures, from both static and kinematic information, in a unified framework is described, with a detailed theory of unit formation that accounts for most cases of boundary perception in the absence of local physical specification.

674 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...This general principle (or its modern incarnations, e.g. Kellman & Shipley, 1991) is thought to underlie many cases of amodal completion....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The new model, which is based on a combination of local and global anchoring of lightness values, appears to provide an unprecedented account of a wide range of empirical results, both classical and recent, especially the pattern of errors.
Abstract: A review of the field of lightness perception from Helmholtz to the present shows the most adequate theories of lightness perception to be the intrinsic image models. Nevertheless, these models fail on 2 important counts: They contain no anchoring rule, and they fail to account for the pattern of errors in surface lightness. Recent work on both the anchoring problem and the problem of errors has produced a new model of lightness perception, one that is qualitatively different from the intrinsic image models. The new model, which is based on a combination of local and global anchoring of lightness values, appears to provide an unprecedented account of a wide range of empirical results, both classical and recent, especially the pattern of errors. It provides a unified account of both illumination-dependent failures of constancy and background-dependent failures of constancy, resolving a number of long-standing puzzles.

577 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

471 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...…out further the role of genuinely perceptual mechanisms in causing people to make inferences about causality (Duncker, 1945, pp. 66–67; Leslie, 1988; Michotte, 1954/1963; Ortiz, 2006, p. 54; Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000), actions and intentions (Scholl & Gao, 2013; Van de Cruys, Wagemans, & Ekroll,…...

    [...]

  • ...…naively tend to think that causality is inferred by conscious reasoning, there is ample evidence to suggest that it is also experienced automatically on the basis of perceptual mechanisms (Duncker, 1945, pp. 66– 67; Leslie, 1988; Michotte, 1954/1963; Ortiz, 2006, p. 54; Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI

453 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...…the objects in Figure 7a as hidden behind the ”bubbled” occluder in Figure 7b is that they are perceived as larger than the relevant parts of the bubbled occluder (which is experienced as being located in the foreground) due to size–distance invariance (Emmert’s law; see Holway & Boring, 1941)....

    [...]

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1969
TL;DR: It is argued here that the logic of the authors' perceptual terms is a branch of modal logic, which involves a reference to one particular sense modality, and such words as ‘perceives’, which are neutral in this respect.
Abstract: Should the title of this paper prompt you to ask, “What is the logic of perception?”, there is an answer at hand. I shall argue here that the logic of our perceptual terms is a branch of modal logic.1 In saying this, I mean by ‘perceptual terms’ both such words as ‘sees’, ‘hears’, ‘feels’, etc., which involve a reference to one particular sense modality, and such words as ‘perceives’, which are neutral in this respect. By modal logic, I mean not only the logic of the terms ‘necessary’ and ‘possible’ but also the logic of all the other terms that can be studied in the same ways as they. Among these terms are most of the words that are usually said to express propositional attitudes, including ‘knows’, ‘believes’, ‘remembers’, ‘hopes’, ‘strives’, etc. What is in common to all the modal notions in this extended sense of the term will be partly explained later.2

453 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...Thus, on the basis of the well-known idea that the perceptual system tends to avoid interpretations involving unlikely coincidences (Biederman, 1987; Freeman, 1994; Rock, 1983) we may speculate that amodal absence does not involve the perceptual exclusion of all possible objects but only those that are deemed to be particularly unlikely on the basis of cues such as their size and shape relative to the occluder....

    [...]

  • ...…of the well-known idea that the perceptual system tends to avoid interpretations involving unlikely coincidences (Biederman, 1987; Freeman, 1994; Rock, 1983) we may speculate that amodal absence does not involve the perceptual exclusion of all possible objects but only those that are deemed to…...

    [...]