scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

The Other Side of Magic.

11 Jan 2017-Perspectives on Psychological Science (Perspect Psychol Sci)-Vol. 12, Iss: 1, pp 91-106
TL;DR: It is argued that perceptual and cognitive principles governing how humans experience hidden things and reason about them play a central role in many magic tricks, and how insights from perceptual psychology provide a framework for understanding why these tricks work so well.
Abstract: When magicians perform spectacles that seem to defy the laws of nature, they do so by manipulating psychological reality. Hence, the principles underlying the art of conjuring are potentially of interest to psychological science. Here, we argue that perceptual and cognitive principles governing how humans experience hidden things and reason about them play a central role in many magic tricks. Different from tricks based on many other forms of misdirection, which require considerable skill on the part of the magician, many elements of these tricks are essentially self-working because they rely on automatic perceptual and cognitive processes. Since these processes are not directly observable, even experienced magicians may be oblivious to their central role in creating strong magical experiences and tricks that are almost impossible to debunk, even after repeated presentations. We delineate how insights from perceptual psychology provide a framework for understanding why these tricks work so well. Conversely, we argue that studying magic tricks that work much better than one intuitively would believe provides a promising heuristic for charting unexplored aspects of perception and cognition.

Summary (1 min read)

Introduction

  • Note that these experiences are quite compelling even though you know very well that there is no complete triangle (in panel c) or cross (in panel d) behind your thumb.
  • It is also interesting to consider that with tricks based on attentional misdirection, every sense of magic is lost once you know how the trick works.

Cognitive impenetrability

  • The only reason why the upper figures look white while the lower figures look black is that they are viewed in different contexts (Anderson & Winawer, 2005; see also Adelson, 2000 and Gilchrist et al., 1999 for similar demonstrations).
  • Some effects of learning and knowledge on their mental processing of occluded objects have been documented, (Vrins et al., 2009, Hazenberg et al., 2014, Hazenberg & van Lier, 2015), but it can be discussed whether these effects are part of what should be called amodal perception proper.
  • When people try to debunk a trick based on amodal perception, the cognitively impenetrable illusion (or visual fixedness) closes the door to the right solution even before any conscious problem-solving even starts.
  • Visual fixedness and the cognitive impenetrability of perceptual mechanisms may be regarded as an extreme form of this kind of generation of false assumptions that may be critical to the robustness and potency of many magic tricks.
  • Based on this reasoning, investigating the effect of repeated presentations of magic tricks on the spectators’ likelihood of figuring out the method could be a promising tool for elucidating the nature of the mechanisms underlying different kinds of magic tricks.

Summary and conclusions

  • The authors have argued that automatic perceptual and cognitive mechanisms governing how they experience and reason about hidden things – in particular those underlying the well-known phenomenon of amodal presence and the less well-known, but presumably intimately related phenomenon of amodal absence –play a central role in many magic tricks.
  • The authors have also argued the causal role of these mechanisms, which cannot be observed directly, is difficult to appreciate even for experienced magicians, and that it may therefore have been largely neglected in discussions of how magic works.
  • The authors have also suggested that the surprising discrepancy between the expected and the actual efficiency of many magical routines may serve as a tell-tale sign of interesting psychological effects that may help guide further research into the psychology of magic.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

For Review Only







 !
"#$"%!%
&
'#()!%
*+,-"./012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
#,7 012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
8 #,%012)(2341(25,(")
*6#% 
49$
' ,,%+ & &$ #,1&
!# 
1)$49$
!#$#, ,' 2#"

Perspectives on Psychological Science

For Review Only



 !
"#$#%&"$#'$
Page 1 of 44 Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
(

!!!)*$)
$!!+,!!$)!$
!!!!+,*$!$)!#
!#**!)))$!
!!+-!))!*!.$
!)!!/
*!$$!!$)!#!+!!
)!##!)!#$!
!!!)!*!)$#
)+)*!$!#)*
$))*!**+0#*$$)!!
*$!*$)$###)$!!
$)!!)!+
Page 2 of 44Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
1



 !!"#$%!%&#
2!!$!!!))
$)!)$!!$)+2))*)!*
!3!#4+!$!$!$
)!#%!'#)!$)
)*))**+5#$#)$
!$!!!$)!)!!
%&6789:67;9&$<=(8879>!&=)=
(8879=&$(8?9@+(8?')!!#
!!!)!!!!)#)
!$))!!+
@#$*!)!!!#$
%,)(88+6')$!#)
$!$!$))!!!
)%>(889&$@(8)
*)))!'+=!!)
%=AB=066C9#66C9=(88?')
.$)!!#$!*!)!!!$
)!$)!!!)!$
!+!)%>!=!667'*
Page 3 of 44 Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

For Review Only
D
!!$$!#E$
E$!)#)+<$
!*!$)$)!$)$!$!!#!!
)$!)$
%#(88('+@#$***!#)*
*!#+
@!!!$!$#$!#)!
)$!!!%&$+(8D'+2$!#!
!)*$))$#$.$
$)*##)+F!
)&$@F))0%(887'*$!!$
$*!!$#)!)
*+!!#*$)!$!#$#
!!$*##)$$*
!)*$)+
!))!!.$!)
!$.$!)$)+@)))
!$)$!!$#**$)
!!$/$#+<!!)#!!$*$
$)*G!H$H++!*
)!*!)+>!)!$!!!
#))#!*#!!)!$
$$#!$$*)+2))
$#)))#
!*!!))$$!!$!$
!!!)!!#!*+!)!!)
Page 4 of 44Perspectives on Psychological Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This review provides a selective overview of experimental studies on predictive mechanisms in human vision for action and presents classic paradigms and novel approaches investigating mechanisms that underlie the prediction of events guiding eye and hand movements.
Abstract: Prediction allows humans and other animals to prepare for future interactions with their environment. This is important in our dynamically changing world that requires fast and accurate reactions to external events. Knowing when and where an event is likely to occur allows us to plan eye, hand, and body movements that are suitable for the circumstances. Predicting the sensory consequences of such movements helps to differentiate between self-produced and externally generated movements. In this review, we provide a selective overview of experimental studies on predictive mechanisms in human vision for action. We present classic paradigms and novel approaches investigating mechanisms that underlie the prediction of events guiding eye and hand movements.

38 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that gaze behavior in crowd navigation is task-dependent, and that not every fixation is strictly necessary for navigating crowds, and when explicitly tasked with seeking out potential social affordances, gaze is modulated as a result.
Abstract: Human crowds provide an interesting case for research on the perception of people. In this study, we investigate how visual information is acquired for (1) navigating human crowds and (2) seeking out social affordances in crowds by studying gaze behavior during human crowd navigation under different task instructions. Observers (n = 11) wore head-mounted eye-tracking glasses and walked two rounds through hallways containing walking crowds (n = 38) and static objects. For round one, observers were instructed to avoid collisions. For round two, observers furthermore had to indicate with a button press whether oncoming people made eye contact. Task performance (walking speed, absence of collisions) was similar across rounds. Fixation durations indicated that heads, bodies, objects, and walls maintained gaze comparably long. Only crowds in the distance maintained gaze relatively longer. We find no compelling evidence that human bodies and heads hold one’s gaze more than objects while navigating crowds. When eye contact was assessed, heads were fixated more often and for a total longer duration, which came at the cost of looking at bodies. We conclude that gaze behavior in crowd navigation is task-dependent, and that not every fixation is strictly necessary for navigating crowds. When explicitly tasked with seeking out potential social affordances, gaze is modulated as a result. We discuss our findings in the light of current theories and models of gaze behavior. Furthermore, we show that in a head-mounted eye-tracking study, a large degree of experimental control can be maintained while many degrees of freedom on the side of the observer remain.

17 citations


Cites background from "The Other Side of Magic."

  • ...A person’s gaze direction, for example, can hold valuable information regarding that person’s spatial locus of attention (Langton et al., 2000), a fact that is often exploited by magicians (e.g., Tatler et al. (2007) and Ekroll et al. (2017))....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.
Abstract: Amodal completion is the phenomenon of perceiving completed objects even though physically they are partially occluded. In this review, we provide an extensive overview of the results obtained from a variety of neuroimaging studies on the neural correlates of amodal completion. We discuss whether low-level and high-level cortical areas are implicated in amodal completion; provide an overview of how amodal completion unfolds over time while dissociating feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes; and discuss how amodal completion is represented at the neuronal level. The involvement of low-level visual areas such as V1 and V2 is not yet clear, while several high-level structures such as the lateral occipital complex and fusiform face area seem invariant to occlusion of objects and faces, respectively, and several motor areas seem to code for object permanence. The variety of results on the timing of amodal completion hints to a mixture of feedforward, recurrent, and feedback processes. We discuss whether the invisible parts of the occluded object are represented as if they were visible, contrary to a high-level representation. While plenty of questions on amodal completion remain, this review presents an overview of the neuroimaging findings reported to date, summarizes several insights from computational models, and connects research of other perceptual completion processes such as modal completion. In all, it is suggested that amodal completion is the solution to deal with various types of incomplete retinal information, and highly depends on stimulus complexity and saliency, and therefore also give rise to a variety of observed neural patterns.

16 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is argued and demonstrated that observers are even susceptible to these fuzzy regularities and that they complete partly occluded shapes accordingly, and two extensions of the stimulus domain are proposed to further illustrate the necessity of global accounts.

75 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...Thus, to borrow an example from van Lier (1999), “seeing” the backside of a tree trunk can also be considered as an instance of amodal completion....

    [...]

  • ...Rather, in so-called amodal volume completion (Tse, 1999; van Lier, 1999; van Lier & Wagemans, 1999), the visible surface of a full-fledged three-dimensional object can complete amodally into the entire boundary surface of a volumetric surface....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article argues that a more natural way of making sense of misdirection is to focus on the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms involved, and develops a psychologically-based taxonomy based on the mechanisms that control these effects.
Abstract: Magicians use misdirection to prevent you from realizing the methods used to create a magical effect, thereby allowing you to experience an apparently impossible event. Magicians have acquired much knowledge about misdirection, and have suggested several taxonomies of misdirection. These describe many of the fundamental principles in misdirection, focusing on how misdirection is achieved by magicians. In this article we review the strengths and weaknesses of past taxonomies, and argue that a more natural way of making sense of misdirection is to focus on the perceptual and cognitive mechanisms involved. Our psychologically-based taxonomy has three basic categories, corresponding to the types of psychological mechanisms affected: perception, memory, and reasoning. Each of these categories is then divided into subcategories based on the mechanisms that control these effects. This new taxonomy can help organize magicians' knowledge of misdirection in a meaningful way, and facilitate the dialog between magicians and scientists.

74 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...As discussed by Kuhn et al. (2014), an important feature of successful misdirection is that it should be counterintuitive....

    [...]

  • ...In terms of the taxonomy of misdirection recently proposed by Kuhn et al. (2014), magic based on amodal perception and other cognitively impenetrable perceptual effects fit nicely into the category of nonattentional perceptual misdirection....

    [...]

  • ...…neglected factor in magic, which we believe is of great practical and theoretical importance but tends to escape the attention of magicians because it is, to a much greater extent than many other forms of misdirection (see Kuhn et al., 2014, for an overview), independent of the magician’s skill....

    [...]

  • ...Magicians also often highlight the importance of setting up misleading assumptions and expectations in order to conceal the method behind a trick (Kuhn et al., 2014; Ortiz, 2006)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Mar 2017
TL;DR: The wissenschaftliche psychologie arbeitet fast überall, soweit sie konkrete Einzelforschung betreibt bei aller Verschiedenheit der allgemeinen Lehrmeinungen -, with einer sehr prägnanten Grundanschauung vom Psychischen; einer Anschauung, die in voller Konsequenz, in Voller Wirklichkeit erfaßt, natürlich em
Abstract: Die wissenschaftliche Psychologie arbeitet fast überall, soweit sie konkrete Einzelforschung betreibt bei aller Verschiedenheit der allgemeinen Lehrmeinungen -, mit einer sehr prägnanten Grundanschauung vom Psychischen; einer Anschauung, die in voller Konsequenz, in voller Wirklichkeit erfaßt, natürlich empfindenden Menschen immer von neuem recht eigentlich fremd, hölzern, ungeheuerlich erscheinen muß (obzwar sie mit sehr charakteristischen Faktoren moderner Weltanschauung aufs innerste zusammenhängt); die aber schon wegen ihrer unzweifelhaften Vorzüge im Sinn wissenschaftlicher Exaktheit gegenüber vageren Meinungen immer wieder mit Selbstverständlichkeit im konkreten Wissenschaftsbetriebe vorausgesetzt wird; um so mehr, als man dazu neigt, manches Wesentliche dieser Grundanschauung als Erfordernis sauber wissenschaftlichen Verfahrens überhaupt anzusehen.

53 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...Panels (a) and (b) of Figure 2 illustrate the well-known Gestalt principle of good continuation (Wertheimer, 1923/2012)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2013
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a model of seeing absence based on visual expectations and a visual matching process, which can serve as an adequacy-test for a theory of perceptual content.
Abstract: Intuitively, we often see absences. For example, if someone steals your laptop at a cafe, you may see its absence from your table. However, absence perception presents a paradox. On prevailing models of perception, we see only present objects and scenes (Marr, Gibson, Dretske). So, we cannot literally see something that is not present. This suggests that we never literally perceive absences; instead, we come to believe that something is absent cognitively on the basis of what we perceive. But this cognitive explanation does not do justice to the phenomenology. Many experiences of absence possess immediate, perceptual qualities. One may further argue that the ability to detect certain absences confers strong adaptive advantage and therefore must be as primitive and fundamental to humans as seeing positive things. I argue that we can literally see absences; in addition to representing objects, perception represents absences of objects. I present a model of seeing absence based on visual expectations and a visual matching process. The phenomenon of seeing absence can thus serve as an adequacy-test for a theory of perceptual content. If experiences of absence are possible, then we have another reason (following Siegel) to reject the view that perceptual content is restricted to colors and shapes. Furthermore, if the proposed account is correct, then we have grounds for dissociating seeing absence from other imagery-based phenomena termed “perceptual presence-in-absence” (Noe, Macpherson).

47 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A philosophical investigation of the experience of magic can be found in this paper, where the authors argue that belief-discordant alief holds the key to a correct answer to the question of what cognitive attitude is involved in magic.
Abstract: Despite its enduring popularity, theatrical magic remains all but ignored by art critics, art historians, and philosophers. This is unfortunate, since magic offers a unique and distinctively intellectual aesthetic experience and raises a host of interesting philosophical questions. Thus, this article initiates a philosophical investigation of the experience of magic. Section I dispels two widespread misconceptions about the nature of magic and discusses the sort of depiction it requires. Section II asks, “What cognitive attitude is involved in the experience of magic?” and criticizes three candidate replies; Section III then argues that Tamar Szabo Gendler's notion of “belief-discordant alief” holds the key to a correct answer. Finally, Section IV develops an account of the experience of magic and explores some of its consequences. The result is a philosophically rich view of the experience of magic that opens new avenues for inquiry and is relevant to core issues in contemporary aesthetics.

43 citations


"The Other Side of Magic." refers background in this paper

  • ...…causality (Duncker, 1945, pp. 66–67; Leslie, 1988; Michotte, 1954/1963; Ortiz, 2006, p. 54; Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000), actions and intentions (Scholl & Gao, 2013; Van de Cruys, Wagemans, & Ekroll, 2015), or even “realness” (Leddington, 2016; Mausfeld, 2013; Michotte, 1991; Vishwanath, 2013, 2014)....

    [...]

  • ...Ortiz (2006, p. 37; see also Leddington, 2016) has argued that magic “can only be established by a process of elimination.”...

    [...]

  • ...” Yet, the audience not only perceives that the knife penetrates the arm, they also experience it as utterly real (Leddington, 2016; Mausfeld, 2013; Michotte, 1991) and correspondingly repulsive....

    [...]

  • ...Yet, the audience not only perceives that the knife penetrates the arm, they also experience it as utterly real (Leddington, 2016; Mausfeld, 2013; Michotte, 1991) and correspondingly repulsive....

    [...]

  • ...54; Scholl & Tremoulet, 2000), actions and intentions (Scholl & Gao, 2013; Van de Cruys, Wagemans, & Ekroll, 2015), or even “realness” (Leddington, 2016; Mausfeld, 2013; Michotte, 1991; Vishwanath, 2013, 2014)....

    [...]