The pearlite reaction

TLDR: In this article, a critical appraisal of theory and experiments for both isothermal and forced velocity pearlite is presented, and a new perturbation procedure for definition of the optimal steady-state spacing is presented.

Abstract: A critical appraisal of theory and experiments for both isothermal and forced velocity pearlite is presented. It is concluded for binary systems that both the theoretical models for volume diffusion and boundary diffusion control are well-advanced and adequate for the purposes of experimental test. However, some ambiguity remains in the boundary diffusion model with respect to the thermodynamics of the boundary ”phase” region, so it is still not possible to predict absolute rates of transformation. The theoretical problem for ternary pearlites is also well understood, although rigorous theory seems intractable. A new perturbation procedure for definition of the optimal steady-state spacing is presented and amplified for both isothermal and forced velocity pearlite, and for both volume and boundary diffusion models. In terms of the critical spacing Sc for isothermal pearlite and the spacing at minimum undercooling Sm for forced velocity pearlite the predicted stability points are as follows: {fx2777-1} For isothermal pearlite these perturbation results correspond closely to the state of maximum entropy production rate while for forced velocity pearlite the correspondence is also satisfactory. A detailed analysis of the data leads us to reaffirm the author’s conclusions that the eutectoid reactions in Cu-12 pct Al and some related ternary alloys reported by Asundi and West are controlled by volume diffusion and that the eutectoid reaction in Al-78 Zn reported by Cheetham and Ridley is controlled by boundary diffusion. We conclude further after careful analysis that the pearlite reaction in Fe-0.8 C is controlled for the higher temperatures by volume diffusion of carbon in austenite. We are also led to state that the pearlite transformations in Fe-C-Mn and Fe-C-Ni occur for the most part in a nopartition regime and are therefore controlled by volume diffusion of carbon in austenite, while the transformations in Fe-C-Cr and Fe-C-Mo, being forced by thermodynamics to sustain partition of chromium and molybdenum, are controlled by phase boundary diffusion of the latter elements. nt]mis|M. P. PULS, formerly Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada