scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Politics of Disablement

Paul Abberley
- Vol. 7, Iss: 4, pp 381-382
Reads0
Chats0
About
The article was published on 1992-01-01. It has received 1625 citations till now.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Dilemmas in qualitative health research

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the problem posed by the novelty and diversity of qualitative approaches within health psychology and consider the question of what criteria are appropriate for assessing the validity of a qualitative analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stigma in the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a review of the literature and recommendations for the way forward.

TL;DR: A systematically review of the scientific literature on HIV/AIDS-related stigma to document the current state of research, identify gaps in the available evidence and highlight promising strategies to address stigma.
Book ChapterDOI

The social model of disability: An outdated ideology?

TL;DR: This article explore the background to British academic and political debates over the social model, and argue that the time has come to move beyond this position and to a more adequate social theory of disability.
Journal ArticleDOI

Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that there is no single way of describing autism that is universally accepted and preferred by the UK’s autism community and that some disagreements appear deeply entrenched.
Journal ArticleDOI

The social model of disability: thirty years on

TL;DR: In this article, the authors restate their view of what the social model was and what I see as its potential for improving the lives of disabled people and focus on the unfortunate criticisms of it and the disastrous implications these have had for disabled people.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Labor and Monopoly Capital

Harry Braverman
- 01 Jul 1974 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, the structure of the working class and the manner in which it had changed in the United States were investigated. But the details of this process, especially its historical turning points and the shape of the new employment that was taking the place of the old, were not clear to me, and since these things had not yet been clarified in any comprehensive fashion, there was a need for a more substantial historical description and analysis of the process of occupational change than had yet been presented in print.