The relevance of environmental disclosures: Are such disclosures incrementally informative? ☆
Citations
619 citations
Cites background or methods from "The relevance of environmental disc..."
...…with CSR performance superior to that of their industry peers enjoy a reduction in the COEC upon the initiation of standalone CSR reports, while Clarkson et al. (2013) fail to document a significant relation between VEDQ and COEC but find that firms with higher VEDQ report higher future return…...
[...]
...We also include the PEG method COEC in order to provide a comparison to concurrent studies that employ this measure (e.g. Clarkson et al., 2013)....
[...]
...We use two implied COEC proxies that rely on stock price and expectations of future cash flows, consistent with a broad stream of research that examines disclosure related issues using implied COEC (e.g. Clarkson et al., 2013; Dhaliwal et al., 2011)....
[...]
...We consider this in our analysis by parsing the data from our disclosure index (which is similar to the Clarkson et al., 2013 index) in the following manner....
[...]
...First, consistent with Clarkson et al. (2013), we classify the items in the voluntary environmental disclosure index into those that are related to hard/objective and soft/subjective disclosures.2 We also consider the ‘‘nature’’ (positive, negative, or neutral3) of the items in the environmental…...
[...]
426 citations
282 citations
Cites background from "The relevance of environmental disc..."
...More recently, De Villiers and Van Staden (2011) find that economic performance (measured using ROA) is negatively related to environmental disclosures in the annual report, while Clarkson et al. (2013) find that voluntary environmental disclosures in the five most polluting US industries are incrementally informative relative to toxic emissions data and that investors seem to use emissions data to assess firms’ risks. Similarly, in another study examining US firms, Plumlee et al. (2015) present evidence consistent with an association between voluntary environmental disclosure quality and a firm’s cost of equity capital and expected future cash flows. Dhaliwal et al. (2011) attempt to look beyond the environmental aspect by focusing on standalone CSR reports. They examine whether firms that voluntarily initiate such a report benefit from a decline in their cost of capital. They find that firms with a high cost of capital tend to initiate a stand-alone CSR report and that, subsequently, they experience a reduction in the cost of equity capital under certain conditions. Dhaliwal et al. (2011) use a binary indicator to capture the presence or non-presence of a stand-alone report. In contrast, we use a continuous measure related to the content of all CSR disclosures. Simnett, Vanstraelen, and Chua (2009) examine the characteristics of firms that issue sustainability reports and voluntarily have them assured. They use an international sample drawn from 31 countries. Simnett et al. (2009) find that firms that have a greater need to enhance the credibility of their reports seek assurance....
[...]
...More recently, De Villiers and Van Staden (2011) find that economic performance (measured using ROA) is negatively related to environmental disclosures in the annual report, while Clarkson et al. (2013) find that voluntary environmental disclosures in the five most polluting US industries are incrementally informative relative to toxic emissions data and that investors seem to use emissions data to assess firms’ risks. Similarly, in another study examining US firms, Plumlee et al. (2015) present evidence consistent with an association between voluntary environmental disclosure quality and a firm’s cost of equity capital and expected future cash flows. Dhaliwal et al. (2011) attempt to look beyond the environmental aspect by focusing on standalone CSR reports. They examine whether firms that voluntarily initiate such a report benefit from a decline in their cost of capital. They find that firms with a high cost of capital tend to initiate a stand-alone CSR report and that, subsequently, they experience a reduction in the cost of equity capital under certain conditions. Dhaliwal et al. (2011) use a binary indicator to capture the presence or non-presence of a stand-alone report. In contrast, we use a continuous measure related to the content of all CSR disclosures. Simnett, Vanstraelen, and Chua (2009) examine the characteristics of firms that issue sustainability reports and voluntarily have them assured. They use an international sample drawn from 31 countries. Simnett et al. (2009) find that firms that have a greater need to enhance the credibility of their reports seek assurance. They find that firms in stakeholder-oriented countries (i.e. code law countries) are more likely to have their reports assured than firms in shareholderoriented countries (i.e. common law countries). Dhaliwal, Radhakrishnan, Tsang, and Yang (2012) use international data and find that CSR reports are more informative for analysts in stakeholder countries. We follow these two studies and employ cross-country data. However, rather than focusing on the assurance aspect or the effect on financial analysts, we re-examine the association between CSR disclosure and firm value. In conducting our tests, we emphasize that we are interested in CSR disclosure rather than CSR performance per se. That is, we examine how the extensiveness of voluntary CSR disclosures leads to economic benefits in terms of higher firm value. The extant literature suggests several channels through which this association may occur. First, if CSR disclosures portray the firm’s real environmental and social performance, that is, they are credible, CSR disclosures should reduce the information asymmetry between firms and their investors. However, if CSR disclosures are opportunistic or unappreciated by the market, CSR disclosures could be unrelated, or even negatively related, to firm value. In Dhaliwal et al. (2011), firms that initiate a 582 S....
[...]
...More recently, De Villiers and Van Staden (2011) find that economic performance (measured using ROA) is negatively related to environmental disclosures in the annual report, while Clarkson et al. (2013) find that voluntary environmental disclosures in the five most polluting US industries are incrementally informative relative to toxic emissions data and that investors seem to use emissions data to assess firms’ risks. Similarly, in another study examining US firms, Plumlee et al. (2015) present evidence consistent with an association between voluntary environmental disclosure quality and a firm’s cost of equity capital and expected future cash flows....
[...]
...Clarkson et al. (2008) find that firm size, firm performance, finan-...
[...]
...dependent variable, Clarkson et al. (2008) incorporate the most comprehensive selection of independent variables (see, e....
[...]
273 citations
263 citations
Cites background or result from "The relevance of environmental disc..."
...Although the results from previous investigations on the value relevance of sustainability disclosure in general are promising (Clarkson et al., 2013; Dhaliwal et al., 2012), the integration of the quality dimension of sustainability disclosure would add a new perspective to the ongoing discussion in this field of research....
[...]
...…affects firm value.3 Although the results from previous investigations on the value relevance of sustainability disclosure in general are promising (Clarkson et al., 2013; Dhaliwal et al., 2012), the integration of the quality dimension of sustainability disclosure would add a new perspective to…...
[...]
References
23,995 citations
4,983 citations
3,621 citations
2,153 citations
2,050 citations