Q2. What is the way forward for the RBV?
The way forward, the authors feel, is to move the RBV's agenda into the inherently dynamic Austrian framework, not by accentuating the rather unfortunately labeled 'dynamic capabilities', but by incorporating time, space and uncertainty-resolution into the RBV'swell-run socio-economy is perishable unless continuously invigorated by successful innovation.
Q3. What are the main reasons why firms exist?
for an explanation of why firms exist, why their boundaries and internal organization are as they are, and why they are better at rent-creation than markets, specific references to incentives, asset ownership, and opportunism are required.
Q4. What is the way to integrate the insights of property rights theory into the RBV?
3. Integrate the insights provided by property rights theory into resource-based theorizing toimprove their understanding of how resource attributes contribute to SCA and performance.
Q5. What should be taken into account in future studies?
To explain performance future studies should take into account the context and processes of resource deployment in realizing the value of resources.
Q6. What is the definition of value creation in the RBV?
Locating the source of value creation within the imagination of those networked provides room for radical, disruptive innovation and a dynamic view of value in the RBV (Foss & Foss, 2008).
Q7. What is the second route for addressing the tendency to tautology?
A second route for addressing the tendency to tautology could be to attend to the time lag between acquiring VRIN resources and gaining an SCA.
Q8. What is the likely explanation for the performance of a resource?
As Newbert (2007) demonstrates, resource configurations (or combinations as they are called there) are more likely to explain performance than single resources.
Q9. What is the RBV's rationale for clinging to a narrow economic?
As their review and suggestions for future theorizing and research indicate, the authors feel the RBVcommunity has clung to an inappropriately narrow neo-classical economic rationality and has thereby diminished its opportunities for progress over the last decade or so.