scispace - formally typeset

The responsibility to protect : a critical analysis

01 Jan 2010-

...read more


Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

28 citations


References
More filters

[...]

01 Jan 2011

1,995 citations

Book

[...]

01 Jan 1999
TL;DR: In this paper, the informalization of politics and the re-traditionalization of society are discussed, and a new paradigm is proposed -the political instrumentalization of disorder is proposed.
Abstract: Introduction - transitions and continuities - the question of analysis. Part 1 The informalization of politics: whither the state? the illusions of civil society recycled elites. Part 2 The re-traditionalization of society: of masks and men - the question of identity the use and abuse of the irrational - witchcraft and religion warlords bosses and thugs - the profits of violence. Part 3 The productivity of economic "failure": the moral economy of corruption the bounties of dependence what if Africa refused to develop?. Conclusion - a new paradigm - the political instrumentalization of disorder.

1,310 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

518 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

[...]

TL;DR: The Canadian government launched the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty in 2000, which in 2001 published its findings in The Responsibility to Protect, finding broad support for the notion of sovereignty not only as a right, but also a responsibility, the responsibility of a state to provide protection for its people.
Abstract: The decision whether, if ever, to intervene in the affairs of a sovereign state with military force has become a critical issue of the post Cold War era. In 2000 the Canadian government launched the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS), which in 2001 published its findings in The Responsibility to Protect. The Commission found broad support for the notion of sovereignty not only as a right, but also a responsibility, the responsibility of a state to provide protection for its people. The primary responsibility for protecting citizens rests with states. But when states are unable or unwilling to provide this protection, or are themselves the perpetrators of atrocities, the Commission argues that the international community has a responsibility temporarily to step in, forcefully if necessary. The Commission resisted the temptation to identify human rights violations falling short of outright killing or ethnic cleansing. This eliminates the possibility of intervening on the ...

517 citations


"The responsibility to protect : a c..." refers background in this paper

  • [...]

  • [...]

  • [...]

  • [...]

  • [...]

Book

[...]

10 Sep 2008
TL;DR: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle as discussed by the authors states that the primary responsibility for protecting its own people from mass atrocity crimes lies with the state itself, and that the wider international community has a collective responsibility to take whatever action is necessary.
Abstract: Never again! the world has vowed time and again since the Holocaust. Yet genocide, ethnic cleansing, and other mass atrocity crimes continue to shock our consciences --from the killing fields of Cambodia to the machetes of Rwanda to the agony of Darfur. Gareth Evans has grappled with these issues firsthand. As Australian foreign minister, he was a key broker of the United Nations peace plan for Cambodia. As president of the International Crisis Group, he now works on the prevention and resolution of scores of conflicts and crises worldwide. The primary architect of and leading authority on the Responsibility to Protect (""R2P""), he shows here how this new international norm can once and for all prevent a return to the killing fields. The Responsibility to Protect captures a simple and powerful idea. The primary responsibility for protecting its own people from mass atrocity crimes lies with the state itself. State sovereignty implies responsibility, not a license to kill. But when a state is unwilling or unable to halt or avert such crimes, the wider international community then has a collective responsibility to take whatever action is necessary. R2P emphasizes preventive action above all. That includes assistance for states struggling to contain potential crises and for effective rebuilding after a crisis or conflict to tackle its underlying causes. R2P's primary tools are persuasion and support, not military or other coercion. But sometimes it is right to fight: faced with another Rwanda, the world cannot just stand by. R2P was unanimously adopted by the UN General Assembly at the 2005 World Summit. But many misunderstandings persist about its scope and limits. And much remains to be done to solidify political support and to build institutional capacity. Evans shows, compellingly, how big a break R2P represents from the past, and how, with its acceptance in principle and effective application in practice, the promise of "Never again!" can at last become a reality.

440 citations


Related Papers (5)

[...]

26 Sep 2016

[...]

09 Jul 2013

[...]

01 Jan 2017