The Risk Principle in Action: What Have We Learned From 13,676 Offenders and 97 Correctional Programs?
Citations
659 citations
373 citations
Cites background from "The Risk Principle in Action: What ..."
...…recidivism (Risk principle), target their criminogenic needs, or changeable risk factors for recidivism (Need principle), and match modes of service to their abilities and styles (Responsivity principle; see Andrews et al., 2006; Lowenkamp, Pealer, Smith, & Latessa, 2006; Lowenkamp et al., 2006)....
[...]
329 citations
Cites background from "The Risk Principle in Action: What ..."
...In general, the literature on evidence-based crime prevention, whether in the context of policing high-crime places, or individual offender treatment, suggests that highly focused interventions targeted at specific populations and risk factors produce the most consistent reductions in crime (e.g., Andrews et al. 1990; Lowenkamp et al. 2006; Lum et al. 2011; Weisburd and Eck 2004)....
[...]
328 citations
References
6,930 citations
"The Risk Principle in Action: What ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Several formulae were used for these transformations and the calculation of standard errors and weights.2 For a more complete discussion, see Rosenthal (1991) and Lipsey and Wilson (2001)....
[...]
...…group membership and a dichotomous outcome measure, r can be interpreted as the percentage point difference between the two groups in terms of the outcome measure (for greater detail, see the discussion on the binomial effect size display [BESD] in Rosenthal, 1991, and Lipsey & Wilson, 2001)....
[...]
...The WLS models were estimated using SPSS syntax developed and presented by Lipsey and Wilson (2001)....
[...]
5,181 citations
"The Risk Principle in Action: What ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Given that our dependent measure is an r value between group membership and a dichotomous outcome measure, r can be interpreted as the percentage point difference between the two groups in terms of the outcome measure (for greater detail, see the discussion on the binomial effect size display [BESD] in Rosenthal, 1991, and Lipsey & Wilson, 2001)....
[...]
...Several formulae were used for these transformations and the calculation of standard errors and weights.2 For a more complete discussion, see Rosenthal (1991) and Lipsey and Wilson (2001)....
[...]
...Rosenthal (1991) and Lipsey and Wilson (2001)....
[...]
...…group membership and a dichotomous outcome measure, r can be interpreted as the percentage point difference between the two groups in terms of the outcome measure (for greater detail, see the discussion on the binomial effect size display [BESD] in Rosenthal, 1991, and Lipsey & Wilson, 2001)....
[...]
2,253 citations
"The Risk Principle in Action: What ..." refers methods or result in this paper
...Although we did not investigate the relationship that this practice has with program effectiveness in the current study, prior research indicates that standardized and actuarial assessments are the best method to use for accurate prediction of offender risk (Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998; Grove, Zald, Lebow, Snitz, & Nelson, 1995; Hanson & Bussiere, 1998 )....
[...]
...…practice has with program effectiveness in the current study, prior research indicates that standardized and actuarial assessments are the best method to use for accurate prediction of offender risk (Bonta, Law, & Hanson, 1998; Grove, Zald, Lebow, Snitz, & Nelson, 1995; Hanson & Bussiere, 1998)....
[...]
1,973 citations
"The Risk Principle in Action: What ..." refers background or result in this paper
...…empirical evidence that programs that target offenders who are higher risk are more effective in reducing recidivism than those that do not (Andrews et al., 1990; Andrews & Dowden, 1999; Dowden & Andrews, 1999a, 1999b, 2000; Lowenkamp & Latessa, 2005b); however, the questions still remain:…...
[...]
...…and Hoge (1990) was followed by a number of meta-analyses that confirmed and supported the importance of focusing on offenders who are higher risk (Andrews et al., 1990; Andrews & Dowden, 1999; Dowden & Andrews 1999a, 1999b, 2000; Lipsey & Wilson, 1998; D. B. Wilson, Gottfredson, & Najaka, 2001;…...
[...]
...This principle states that our most intensive correctional treatment and intervention programs should be reserved for offenders who are higher risk (Andrews et al., 1990)....
[...]
1,737 citations