Book•
The self-consistent field for molecules and solids
01 Jan 1974-
About: The article was published on 1974-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 793 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Field (physics).
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: In this paper, the self-interaction correction (SIC) of any density functional for the ground-state energy is discussed. But the exact density functional is strictly selfinteraction-free (i.e., orbitals demonstrably do not selfinteract), but many approximations to it, including the local spin-density (LSD) approximation for exchange and correlation, are not.
Abstract: The exact density functional for the ground-state energy is strictly self-interaction-free (i.e., orbitals demonstrably do not self-interact), but many approximations to it, including the local-spin-density (LSD) approximation for exchange and correlation, are not. We present two related methods for the self-interaction correction (SIC) of any density functional for the energy; correction of the self-consistent one-electron potenial follows naturally from the variational principle. Both methods are sanctioned by the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem. Although the first method introduces an orbital-dependent single-particle potential, the second involves a local potential as in the Kohn-Sham scheme. We apply the first method to LSD and show that it properly conserves the number content of the exchange-correlation hole, while substantially improving the description of its shape. We apply this method to a number of physical problems, where the uncorrected LSD approach produces systematic errors. We find systematic improvements, qualitative as well as quantitative, from this simple correction. Benefits of SIC in atomic calculations include (i) improved values for the total energy and for the separate exchange and correlation pieces of it, (ii) accurate binding energies of negative ions, which are wrongly unstable in LSD, (iii) more accurate electron densities, (iv) orbital eigenvalues that closely approximate physical removal energies, including relaxation, and (v) correct longrange behavior of the potential and density. It appears that SIC can also remedy the LSD underestimate of the band gaps in insulators (as shown by numerical calculations for the rare-gas solids and CuCl), and the LSD overestimate of the cohesive energies of transition metals. The LSD spin splitting in atomic Ni and $s\ensuremath{-}d$ interconfigurational energies of transition elements are almost unchanged by SIC. We also discuss the admissibility of fractional occupation numbers, and present a parametrization of the electron-gas correlation energy at any density, based on the recent results of Ceperley and Alder.
16,027 citations
TL;DR: This chapter discusses the development of DFT as a tool for Calculating Atomic andMolecular Properties and its applications, as well as some of the fundamental and Computational aspects.
Abstract: I. Introduction: Conceptual vs Fundamental andComputational Aspects of DFT1793II. Fundamental and Computational Aspects of DFT 1795A. The Basics of DFT: The Hohenberg−KohnTheorems1795B. DFT as a Tool for Calculating Atomic andMolecular Properties: The Kohn−ShamEquations1796C. Electronic Chemical Potential andElectronegativity: Bridging Computational andConceptual DFT1797III. DFT-Based Concepts and Principles 1798A. General Scheme: Nalewajski’s ChargeSensitivity Analysis1798B. Concepts and Their Calculation 18001. Electronegativity and the ElectronicChemical Potential18002. Global Hardness and Softness 18023. The Electronic Fukui Function, LocalSoftness, and Softness Kernel18074. Local Hardness and Hardness Kernel 18135. The Molecular Shape FunctionsSimilarity 18146. The Nuclear Fukui Function and ItsDerivatives18167. Spin-Polarized Generalizations 18198. Solvent Effects 18209. Time Evolution of Reactivity Indices 1821C. Principles 18221. Sanderson’s Electronegativity EqualizationPrinciple18222. Pearson’s Hard and Soft Acids andBases Principle18253. The Maximum Hardness Principle 1829IV. Applications 1833A. Atoms and Functional Groups 1833B. Molecular Properties 18381. Dipole Moment, Hardness, Softness, andRelated Properties18382. Conformation 18403. Aromaticity 1840C. Reactivity 18421. Introduction 18422. Comparison of Intramolecular ReactivitySequences18443. Comparison of Intermolecular ReactivitySequences18494. Excited States 1857D. Clusters and Catalysis 1858V. Conclusions 1860VI. Glossary of Most Important Symbols andAcronyms1860VII. Acknowledgments 1861VIII. Note Added in Proof 1862IX. References 1865
3,890 citations
TL;DR: The WIEN package as discussed by the authors uses LAPW's to calculate the LSDA total energy, spin densities, Kohn-Sham eigenvalues, and the electric field gradients at nuclear sites for a broad variety of space groups.
2,485 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, an extensive survey of density functional atomization energies on the 55 molecules of the Gaussian-1 thermochemical data base of Pople and co−workers is presented.
Abstract: Previous work by the author on diatomic molecules and by others on polyatomic systems has revealed that Kohn–Sham density‐functional theory with ‘‘gradient corrected’’ exchange‐correlation approximations gives remarkably good molecular bond and atomization energies. In the present communication, we report the results of an extensive survey of density‐functional atomization energies on the 55 molecules of the Gaussian‐1 thermochemical data base of Pople and co‐workers [J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5622 (1989); 93, 2537 (1990)]. These calculations have been performed by the fully numerical molecules (NUMOL) program of Becke and Dickson [J. Chem. Phys. 92, 3610 (1990)] and are therefore free of basis‐set uncertainties. We find an average absolute error in the total atomization energies of our 55 test molecules of 3.7 kcal/mol, compared to 1.6 kcal/mol for the Gaussian‐1 procedure and 1.2 kcal/mol for Gaussian‐2.
2,366 citations
TL;DR: In this article, a simple scheme for decomposition of molecular functions into single center components is proposed, which reduces the problem of three-dimensional integration in molecular systems to a sum of one-center, atomic-like integrations which are treated using standard numerical techniques in spherical polar coordinates.
Abstract: We propose a simple scheme for decomposition of molecular functions into single‐center components The problem of three‐dimensional integration in molecular systems thus reduces to a sum of one‐center, atomic‐like integrations which are treated using standard numerical techniques in spherical polar coordinates The resulting method is tested on representative diatomic and polyatomic systems for which we obtain five‐ or six‐figure accuracy using a few thousand integration points per atom
2,319 citations