The stability of non-dissipative couette flow in hydromagnetics
Citations
1,060 citations
955 citations
Cites background from "The stability of non-dissipative co..."
...The instability can either be of the VelikhovChandrasekhar-Balbus-Hawley type (hereafter BH instability, see Velikhov 1959; Chandrasekhar 1960; Balbus & Hawley 1991), or a buoyancy-driven instability (Parker 1966), though the properties of the resulting field may depend on which of these…...
[...]
863 citations
Cites background or methods or result from "The stability of non-dissipative co..."
...This instability has been known for more than three decades (Velikhov 1959, Chandrasekhar 1960, 1961), but its importance for accretion discs was rst pointed out by Balbus & Hawley (1991), and it is therefore often referred to as the Balbus-Hawley instability. The instability requires a magnetic eld that can be generated either outside the disc (e.g. in the central object) or in the disc itself. Here we consider the latter possibility where the motions resulting from the instability act as a dynamo to sustain the magnetic eld. In a recent paper, Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994) have studied the Balbus-Hawley instability in the presence of an irregular magnetic eld, and have shown that this eld can sustain self-excited turbulence. In their model there is no vertical gravity, and therefore the Parker instability (Parker 1979) does not operate. This is in contrast to the dynamo model of Tout & Pringle (1992), which invokes the Parker instability to transform an azimuthal magnetic eld into a vertical eld. Meanwhile, Stone & Hawley (1994) included vertical gravity with substantial density strati cation and found qualitatively similar results as Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994). They also showed that the saturated state is essentially independent of the initial magnetic eld geometry. The purpose of the present paper is twofold. First of all, simulating dynamo action which generates its own turbulence is a formidable problem in dynamo theory, and is central to the understanding of accretion discs which would not exist if there was no enhanced (e.g., turbulent) angular momentum transport. The papers by Stone & Hawley (1994) and Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994) are based on the same algorithm, and it is desirable to verify their results using an independent method....
[...]
...This instability has been known for more than three decades (Velikhov 1959, Chandrasekhar 1960, 1961), but its importance for accretion discs was rst pointed out by Balbus & Hawley (1991), and it is therefore often referred to as the Balbus-Hawley instability. The instability requires a magnetic eld that can be generated either outside the disc (e.g. in the central object) or in the disc itself. Here we consider the latter possibility where the motions resulting from the instability act as a dynamo to sustain the magnetic eld. In a recent paper, Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994) have studied the Balbus-Hawley instability in the presence of an irregular magnetic eld, and have shown that this eld can sustain self-excited turbulence. In their model there is no vertical gravity, and therefore the Parker instability (Parker 1979) does not operate. This is in contrast to the dynamo model of Tout & Pringle (1992), which invokes the Parker instability to transform an azimuthal magnetic eld into a vertical eld....
[...]
...This instability has been known for more than three decades (Velikhov1959, Chandrasekhar 1960, 1961), but its importance for accretion discs was rst pointedout by Balbus & Hawley (1991), and it is therefore often referred to as the Balbus-Hawleyinstability....
[...]
...This instability has been known for more than three decades (Velikhov 1959, Chandrasekhar 1960, 1961), but its importance for accretion discs was rst pointed out by Balbus & Hawley (1991), and it is therefore often referred to as the Balbus-Hawley instability. The instability requires a magnetic eld that can be generated either outside the disc (e.g. in the central object) or in the disc itself. Here we consider the latter possibility where the motions resulting from the instability act as a dynamo to sustain the magnetic eld. In a recent paper, Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994) have studied the Balbus-Hawley instability in the presence of an irregular magnetic eld, and have shown that this eld can sustain self-excited turbulence. In their model there is no vertical gravity, and therefore the Parker instability (Parker 1979) does not operate. This is in contrast to the dynamo model of Tout & Pringle (1992), which invokes the Parker instability to transform an azimuthal magnetic eld into a vertical eld. Meanwhile, Stone & Hawley (1994) included vertical gravity with substantial density strati cation and found qualitatively similar results as Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994). They also showed that the saturated state is essentially independent of the initial magnetic eld geometry....
[...]
...This instability has been known for more than three decades (Velikhov 1959, Chandrasekhar 1960, 1961), but its importance for accretion discs was rst pointed out by Balbus & Hawley (1991), and it is therefore often referred to as the Balbus-Hawley instability. The instability requires a magnetic eld that can be generated either outside the disc (e.g. in the central object) or in the disc itself. Here we consider the latter possibility where the motions resulting from the instability act as a dynamo to sustain the magnetic eld. In a recent paper, Hawley, Gammie, & Balbus (1994) have studied the Balbus-Hawley instability in the presence of an irregular magnetic eld, and have shown that this eld can sustain self-excited turbulence....
[...]
585 citations
Cites background from "The stability of non-dissipative co..."
...The widely cited magneto-rotational instability (Velikhov 1959; Chandrasekhar 1960) occurs only when the B field is weak....
[...]
527 citations