Open AccessBook
The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A political history of the Supreme Court can be found in this paper, where the authors present a model of decision-making in the court and the decision-on-the-merits process.Abstract:
Preface 1. Introduction: Supreme Court policy making 2. Models of decision making 3. A political history of the Supreme Court 4. Staffing the Court 5. Getting into court 6. The decision on the merits process 7. Opinion assignment and opinion coalitions 8. The Supreme Court and constitutional democracy 9. The impact of judicial decisions 10. Conclusion Appendix Index.read more
Citations
More filters
Book
Small Groups: Key Readings
TL;DR: Moreland et al. as mentioned in this paper proposed the Contingency model, a theory of leadership effectiveness, for small group composition and found that it can be used to identify common identity and common bond groups.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953-1999
Andrew D. Martin,Kevin M. Quinn +1 more
TL;DR: This paper employed Markov chain Monte Carlo methods to fit a Bayesian measurement model of ideal points for all justices serving on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1953 through 1999, and found that many justices do not have temporally constant ideal points.
MonographDOI
Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine three constitutional courts in Asia: Taiwan, Korea and Mongolia, and argue that the design and functioning of constitutional review are largely a function of politics and interests.
Journal ArticleDOI
Generalized Estimating Equation Models for Correlated Data: A Review with Applications
TL;DR: The generalized estimating equations (GEE) as discussed by the authors approach has been used to model correlated data in a wide range of forms, such as dyadic studies and dyadic decision analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring Issue Salience
Lee Epstein,Jeffrey A. Segal +1 more
TL;DR: The authors proposed an alternative approach to measure issue saliency for elite actors: the coverage the media affords to a given issue, which is a reproducible, valid, and transportable method of assessing whether the particular actors under investigation view an issue as salient or not.