scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

The WEIRDest People in the World

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
A review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species – frequent outliers.
Abstract
Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Amazon's Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

TL;DR: Findings indicate that MTurk can be used to obtain high-quality data inexpensively and rapidly and the data obtained are at least as reliable as those obtained via traditional methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Most people are not WEIRD

TL;DR: To understand human psychology, behavioural scientists must stop doing most of their experiments on Westerners, argue Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine and Ara Norenzayan.
Journal ArticleDOI

Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing

TL;DR: It is concluded that for some behavioral tests, online recruitment and testing can be a valid-and sometimes even superior-partner to in-person data collection.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory

TL;DR: The hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative: It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade and is adaptive given the exceptional dependence of humans on communication and their vulnerability to misinformation.
Journal ArticleDOI

TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences

TL;DR: How TurkPrime saves time and resources, improves data quality, and allows researchers to design and implement studies that were previously very difficult or impossible to carry out on MTurk is described.
References
More filters
Book

Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

TL;DR: The authors described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: representativeness, availability of instances or scenarios, and adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available.
Book

Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community

TL;DR: Putnam as mentioned in this paper showed that changes in work, family structure, age, suburban life, television, computers, women's roles and other factors are isolating Americans from each other in a trend whose reflection can clearly be seen in British society.
Book

Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values

TL;DR: In his book Culture's Consequences, Geert Hofstede proposed four dimensions on which the differences among national cultures can be understood: Individualism, Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance and Masculinity as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.

TL;DR: Theories of the self from both psychology and anthropology are integrated to define in detail the difference between a construal of self as independent and a construpal of the Self as interdependent as discussed by the authors, and these divergent construals should have specific consequences for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Book

Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations

TL;DR: In this paper, values and culture data collection, treatment and validation power distance Uncertainty Avoidance Individualism and Collectivism Masculinity and Femininity Long versus Short-Term Orientation Cultures in Organizations Intercultural Encounters Using Culture Dimension Scores in Theory and Research
Related Papers (5)

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Alexander A. Aarts, +290 more
- 28 Aug 2015 - 
Trending Questions (3)
Why Western psychological science is WEIRD.?

The paper explains that Western psychological science is WEIRD because it is based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies, which are not representative of the global population.

What is understood about WEIRD psychology?

The paper suggests that WEIRD populations, which are Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic societies, are not representative of the general human population and may not accurately reflect universal features of psychology.

The weirdest people in the world?

The weirdest people in the world are those from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies, who are not representative of the global population.