THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS: Implications for Asteroid Dynamics
Citations
527 citations
448 citations
440 citations
419 citations
356 citations
References
1,419 citations
"THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS: Imp..." refers background in this paper
...…effects was pursued in Russia by Radzievskii (1952, 1954) and Katasev & Kulikova (1980); in the United States by Paddack (1969, 1973), Paddack & Rhee (1975), Peterson (1976), O’Keefe (1976), Slabinski (1977), Dohnanyi (1978), and Burns et al. (1979); and in Australia by Olsson-Steel (1986, 1987)....
[...]
831 citations
"THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS: Imp..." refers background in this paper
...By properly interpreting how families formed and how they evolved, we obtain powerful constraints for numerical hydrocode models (e.g., Benz & Asphaug 1999) and collisional evolution codes (e.g., Bottke et al. 2005a,b), as well as critical clues that allow us to glean insights into the physical…...
[...]
801 citations
717 citations
"THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS: Imp..." refers background or methods in this paper
...See Bottke et al. 2002, pp. 501–15 Rubincam DP. 1987....
[...]
...To set the stage for our discussion of how nongravitational forces affect asteroids, we summarize below the main points of this so-called classical asteroid evolution model (see also Bottke et al. 2002b)....
[...]
...Numerical simulations indicate that the mean dynamical lifetimes of the NEOs are several millions of years (Gladman et al. 1997), although the distribution is bimodal (Bottke et al. 2002b)....
[...]
...There are currently ∼1000 NEOs with D > 1 km and semimajor axis a < 7.4 AU (Bottke et al. 2002b, Stuart & Binzel 2004)....
[...]
...…are combined with the related Yarkovsky effect, YORP may help to explain several puzzling issues about the rotational, orbital, and physical parameters of small asteroids ( Bottke et al. 2002b, Rubincam 2000, Rubincam et al. 2002, Vokrouhlický & Čapek 2002, Morbidelli & Vokrouhlický 2003)....
[...]
616 citations
"THE YARKOVSKY AND YORP EFFECTS: Imp..." refers background in this paper
...…are combined with the related Yarkovsky effect, YORP may help to explain several puzzling issues about the rotational, orbital, and physical parameters of small asteroids ( Bottke et al. 2002b, Rubincam 2000, Rubincam et al. 2002, Vokrouhlický & Čapek 2002, Morbidelli & Vokrouhlický 2003)....
[...]
...An important feature of YORP-driven evolution is that the spin axis gradually tilts toward a specific (asymptotic) obliquity value (Rubincam 2000, Bottke et al. 2002b, Vokrouhlický & Čapek 2002)....
[...]
...Thus, an object must have some “windmill” asymmetry for YORP to work; energy reradiated from a symmetrical body (e.g., a sphere or an ellipsoid) produces no net YORP torque (Rubincam 2000, Bottke et al. 2002b, Vokrouhlický & Čapek 2002)....
[...]
...Thus, YORP is most likely to be important in regimes where the YORP cycle is faster than the spin axis reorientation timescale via collisions (Rubincam 2000, Vokrouhlický & Čapek 2002, Čapek & Vokrouhlický 2004)....
[...]
...FOR INDIVIDUAL ASTEROIDS Rubincam (2000) showed that YORP is strongly dependent on an asteroid’s shape, size, distance from the Sun, and orientation....
[...]