scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Theory and practise of the g-index

Leo Egghe
- 12 Sep 2006 - 
- Vol. 69, Iss: 1, pp 131-152
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is shown that the g-index inherits all the good properties of the h-index and better takes into account the citation scores of the top articles and yields a better distinction between and order of the scientists from the point of view of visibility.
Abstract
The g-index is introduced as an improvement of the h-index of Hirsch to measure the global citation performance of a set of articles. If this set is ranked in decreasing order of the number of citations that they received, the g-index is the (unique) largest number such that the top g articles received (together) at least g 2 citations. We prove the unique existence of g for any set of articles and we have that g ≥ h. The general Lotkaian theory of the g-index is presented and we show that g = (α-1 / α-2) α-1/α T 1/α where a> 2 is the Lotkaian exponent and where T denotes the total number of sources. We then present the g-index of the (still active) Price medallists for their complete careers up to 1972 and compare it with the h-index. It is shown that the g-index inherits all the good properties of the h-index and, in addition, better takes into account the citation scores of the top articles. This yields a better distinction between and order of the scientists from the point of view of visibility.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Does the H index have predictive power

TL;DR: The findings indicate that the h index is better than other indicators considered (total citation count, citations per paper, and total paper count) in predicting future scientific achievement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature

TL;DR: A systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping is presented to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest.
Journal ArticleDOI

Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact

TL;DR: It is shown that the probability that an article is cited c times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator cf = c/c0 is considered, where c0 is the average number of citations per article for the discipline.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

TL;DR: In this paper, an in-depth review of the literature on citation impact indicators is provided, focusing on the selection of publications and citations to be included in the calculation of citation impact indicator.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quantifying long-term scientific impact.

TL;DR: A mechanistic model is derived for the citation dynamics of individual papers, allowing us to collapse the citation histories of papers from different journals and disciplines into a single curve, indicating that all papers tend to follow the same universal temporal pattern.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output

TL;DR: The index h, defined as the number of papers with citation number ≥h, is proposed as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Hirsch-type index for journals

TL;DR: It is suggested that a h-type index - equal to h if you have published h papers, each of which has at least h citations - would be a useful supplement to journal impact factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

An introduction to informetrics

TL;DR: The scope and significance of the field of informetrics is defined and related to the earlier fields of bibliometrics and scientometrics; the phenomena studied by informetricians are identified.
Book

Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science

Leo Egghe, +1 more
TL;DR: This chapter discusses informetric models, the dual approach between sources and items giving rise to the definition of Information Production Processes, and some science policy applications.

An improvement of the h-index: the g-index

Leo Egghe
TL;DR: The H-index as mentioned in this paper measures the number of papers that received h or more citations and is a simple single number incorporating both publication (quantitiy) and citation (quality or visibility) scores and hence has an advantage over these single separate measures.
Related Papers (5)