scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

Theory of International Politics

01 Jan 1979-
About: The article was published on 1979-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 7932 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Global politics & International relations.
Citations
More filters
01 Jan 2008
TL;DR: LaRonde as mentioned in this paper analyzes the conflict in Xinjiang and concludes that the Chinese continue to defeat the separatist movement through a strategy that counters Mao's seven fundamentals of revolutionary warfare, concluding that Mao, as well as the communist leaders who followed him, was also successful at waging protracted counterinsurgency.
Abstract: PROTRACED COUNTERINSURGENCY: CHINESE COIN STRATEGY IN XINJIANG by MAJ J. Scott LaRonde, USA, 95 pages. In 1949, following the conclusion of its revolutionary war against the Chinese Nationalist forces, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) peacefully occupied China’s western most province of Xinjiang. For nearly sixty years, the PLA has conducted a counterinsurgency against several, mostly Uyghur-led, separatist movements. Despite periods of significant violence, particularly in the early 1950s and again in the 1990s, the separatist forces have not gained momentum and remained at a level one insurgency. Mao ZeDeng is revered as a master insurgent and the father of Fourth Generation Warfare. Strategists in armies worldwide study his writings on revolutionary and guerilla warfare. This monograph concludes that Mao, as well as the communist leaders who followed him, was also successful at waging protracted counterinsurgency. For nearly sixty years, separatist movements in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Taiwan have all failed. This monograph analyzes the conflict in Xinjiang and concludes that the Chinese continue to defeat the separatist movement in Xinjiang through a strategy that counters Mao’s seven fundamentals of revolutionary warfare.

773 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper conducted an empirical analysis of the link between refugees and civil conflict since the mid-twentieth century and found that the presence of refugees from neighboring countries leads to an increased probabil-ity of violence, suggesting that refugees are one important source of conflict diffusion.
Abstract: Certain regions of the world experience more conflict than others+ Pre- vious analyses have shown that a civil war in one country significantly increases the likelihood that neighboring states will experience conflict+ This finding, however, still remains largely unexplained+ We argue that population movements are an important mechanism by which conflict spreads across regions+ Refugee flows are not only the consequence of political turmoil—the presence of refugees and displaced popula- tions can also increase the risk of subsequent conflict in host and origin countries+ Refugees expand rebel social networks and constitute a negative externality of civil war+ Although the vast majority of refugees never directly engage in violence, refu- gee flows may facilitate the transnational spread of arms, combatants, and ideologies conducive to conflict; they alter the ethnic composition of the state; and they can exacerbate economic competition+ We conduct an empirical analysis of the link between refugees and civil conflict since the mid-twentieth century, and we find that the presence of refugees from neighboring countries leads to an increased probabil- ity of violence, suggesting that refugees are one important source of conflict diffusion+ Certain regions of the world experience more conflict than others+ Regions such as Central America, the Great Lakes region of Africa, and South-East Asia have witnessed numerous civil wars within several states, whereas other areas such as Europe and the Southern Cone of Latin America have had a relatively low fre- quency of internal conflict+ Statistical analyses, moreover, have demonstrated that there is a regional clustering of civil war and that states bordering countries at war

753 citations


Cites background from "Theory of International Politics"

  • ...…of civil conflicts in the Balkans, Southeast Asia, the Great Lakes region of Africa, and so on, reveals considerable 14+ See Keohane 1984; Waltz 1979; and Wendt 1992+ 15+ See, for example, Collier and Hoeffler 2004; Fearon and Laitin 2003; Hegre et al+ 2001; and Reynal-Querol…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a common mechanism links three important kinds of commitment problems: preventive war, preemptive attacks arising from first-strike or offensive advantages, and conflicts resulting from bargaining over issues that affect future bargaining power.
Abstract: Although formal work on war generally sees war as a kind of bargaining breakdown resulting from asymmetric information, bargaining indivisibilities, or commitment problems, most analyses have focused on informational issues. But informational explanations and the models underlying them have at least two major limitations: they often provide a poor account of prolonged conflict, and they give an odd reading of the history of some cases. This article describes these limitations and argues that bargaining indivisibilities should really be seen as commitment problems. The present analysis then shows that a common mechanism links three important kinds of commitment problem: (1) preventive war, (2) preemptive attacks arising from first-strike or offensive advantages, and (3) conflicts resulting from bargaining over issues that affect future bargaining power. In each case, large, rapid shifts in the distribution of power can lead to war. Finally, the analysis elaborates a distinctly different mechanism based on a comparison of the cost of deterring an attack on the status quo with the expected cost of trying to eliminate the threat to the status quo.For helpful comments and criticisms, I thank James Fearon, Hein Goemans, Lisa Martin, Sebastian Mazzuca, Branislav Slantchev, and seminar participants at the University of Montreal–McGill Research Group in International Security, the Institute in Mathematical Behavioral Sciences, University of California, Irvine, and University of California, Santa Barbara. I also gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (SES-0315037).

749 citations


Cites background from "Theory of International Politics"

  • ...…turns the anarchy-versus-hierarchy distinction between international and domestic politics on its head+ For a discussion of this distinction, see Waltz 1979+ 49+ See Acemoglu and Robinson 2000, 2001, and 2004; Fearon 2004, for formulations along these lines+ 50+ On the effects of war on the…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors used Esping-Andersen's "worlds of welfare capitalism" approach to analyze social policy in the region of Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan.
Abstract: The article engages with the literature on the ‘East Asian welfare model’ by using Esping-Andersen's ‘worlds of welfare capitalism’ approach to analyze social policy in the region. It describes the main features of a productivist world of welfare capitalism that stands alongside Esping-Andersen's conservative, liberal and social democratic worlds. It then shows that Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan are all part of this world, though they divide into sub-groups within it. To account for productivist welfare capitalism in East Asia, the article focuses particularly on bureaucratic politics at the unit level, and on a range of key shaping factors at the system level. It closes by considering the implications of East Asian experience for comparative social policy analysis.

747 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Poverty of Theory as mentioned in this paper is a polemic against structural Marxism, a self-consciously scientific perspective aiming to employ Marxian categories within a structuralist framework to produce theoretical knowledge of the objective structures of capitalist reality.
Abstract: Almost six years ago, E. P. Thompson fixed his critical sights across the English Channel and let fly with a lengthy polemic entitled The Poverty of Theory. Thompson's immediate target was Louis Althusser. His strategic objective was to rebut the emergent Continental orthodoxy that Althusser championed: structural Marxism, a self-consciously scientific perspective aiming to employ Marxian categories within a structuralist framework to produce theoretical knowledge of the objective structures of capitalist reality. The charges Thompson hurled defy brief summary, but some key themes can be quickly recalled. Althusser and the structuralists, Thompson con-

743 citations

References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 1976
TL;DR: For centuries knowledge meant proven knowledge, proven either by the power of the intellect or by the evidence of the senses as discussed by the authors. But the notion of proven knowledge was questioned by the sceptics more than two thousand years ago; but they were browbeaten into confusion by the glory of Newtonian physics.
Abstract: For centuries knowledge meant proven knowledge — proven either by the power of the intellect or by the evidence of the senses. Wisdom and intellectual integrity demanded that one must desist from unproven utterances and minimize, even in thought, the gap between speculation and established knowledge. The proving power of the intellect or the senses was questioned by the sceptics more than two thousand years ago; but they were browbeaten into confusion by the glory of Newtonian physics. Einstein’s results again turned the tables and now very few philosophers or scientists still think that scientific knowledge is, or can be, proven knowledge. But few realize that with this the whole classical structure of intellectual values falls in ruins and has to be replaced: one cannot simply water down the ideal of proven truth - as some logical empiricists do — to the ideal of’probable truth’1 or — as some sociologists of knowledge do — to ‘truth by [changing] consensus’.2

4,969 citations

ReportDOI
17 Feb 1966
TL;DR: This book contains the collected and unified material necessary for the presentation of such branches of modern cybernetics as the theory of electronic digital computers, Theory of discrete automata, theory of discrete self-organizing systems, automation of thought processes, theoryof image recognition, etc.
Abstract: : This book contains the collected and unified material necessary for the presentation of such branches of modern cybernetics as the theory of electronic digital computers, theory of discrete automata, theory of discrete self-organizing systems, automation of thought processes, theory of image recognition, etc. Discussions are given of the fundamentals of the theory of boolean functions, algorithm theory, principles of the design of electronic digital computers and universal algorithmical languages, fundamentals of perceptron theory, some theoretical questions of the theory of self-organizing systems. Many fundamental results in mathematical logic and algorithm theory are presented in summary form, without detailed proofs, and in some cases without any proof. The book is intended for a broad audience of mathematicians and scientists of many specialties who wish to acquaint themselves with the problems of modern cybernetics.

2,922 citations

Journal ArticleDOI

2,873 citations