Theory of production
Citations
6,776 citations
1,935 citations
1,144 citations
Cites background or methods or result from "Theory of production"
...Coelli (2000) and Cuesta and Orea (2002) consider these issues theoretically....
[...]
...Coelli (2000) and Cuesta and Orea (2002) consider these issues theoretically. Note that these methodologically oriented examinations come after the leading applications of the distance function technique (e.g., Sickles et al., 2002; Coelli and Perelman, 1996, 1999, 2000; all of which used the translog form as the modeling platform). The distance function bears close resemblance to other specifications for studying efficiency. Thus, there have been comparisons of inefficiency estimates obtained from estimated distance functions to the counterparts obtained from DEA studies (see Coelli and Perelman, 1999; Sickles et al., 2002). Atkinson, Fare, and Primont (2003) used the concept of the distance function to derive a shadow cost function with which they studied allocative inefficiency. Finally, O’Donnell and Coelli (2005) forced the classical curvature (regulatory) conditions on their estimated distance function. They suggested their method of imposing restrictions on parameters in a Bayesian framework as an alternative to Kleit and Terrell (2001)—they used a Metropolis-Hastings procedure as opposed to Kleit and Terrell’s accept/reject iteration....
[...]
...the concept perhaps to its logical limit, it is worth noting that the first empirical analyses of production functions, by Cobb and Douglas (1928), were precisely studies of the functional distribution of income between capital and labor in the context of an aggregate (macroeconomic) production function....
[...]
...Coelli (2000) and Cuesta and Orea (2002) consider these issues theoretically. Note that these methodologically oriented examinations come after the leading applications of the distance function technique (e.g., Sickles et al., 2002; Coelli and Perelman, 1996, 1999, 2000; all of which used the translog form as the modeling platform). The distance function bears close resemblance to other specifications for studying efficiency. Thus, there have been comparisons of inefficiency estimates obtained from estimated distance functions to the counterparts obtained from DEA studies (see Coelli and Perelman, 1999; Sickles et al., 2002). Atkinson, Fare, and Primont (2003) used the concept of the distance function to derive a shadow cost function with which they studied allocative inefficiency. Finally, O’Donnell and Coelli (2005) forced the classical curvature (regulatory) conditions on their estimated distance function....
[...]
...Coelli (2000) and Cuesta and Orea (2002) consider these issues theoretically. Note that these methodologically oriented examinations come after the leading applications of the distance function technique (e.g., Sickles et al., 2002; Coelli and Perelman, 1996, 1999, 2000; all of which used the translog form as the modeling platform). The distance function bears close resemblance to other specifications for studying efficiency. Thus, there have been comparisons of inefficiency estimates obtained from estimated distance functions to the counterparts obtained from DEA studies (see Coelli and Perelman, 1999; Sickles et al., 2002). Atkinson, Fare, and Primont (2003) used the concept of the distance function to derive a shadow cost function with which they studied allocative inefficiency....
[...]
626 citations
523 citations
Cites methods from "Theory of production"
...framework of Fang (2011) that examines the hypothesis within a Cobb-Douglas production function and the econometric methodology employed in Apergis and Payne (2010)....
[...]
References
11 citations
11 citations