Time-to-first appropriate shock in patients implanted prophylactically with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: data from the Survey on Arrhythmic Events in BRUgada Syndrome (SABRUS)
Summary (2 min read)
INTRODUCTION
- Brugada syndrome (Brs) is a well-recognized cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) particularly in apparently healthy middle-aged males(1).
- The cause of death is a ventricular tachyarrhythmia usually occurring without precipitating warning signs(2) .
- Most clinical research on this potentially lethal arrhythmic disease has mainly focused on risk stratification to identify patients at risk who will benefit from an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), the most advocated option to prevent SCD.
- Present indications for prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with BrS-ECG include(3): 1) Spontaneous type 1 Brugada-ECG pattern and a history of syncope (class IIa indication); 2) Spontaneous or drug-induced type 1 Brugada-ECG with induction of ventricular fibrillation during programmed ventricular stimulation with 2 or 3 extrastimuli (class IIb indication).
- When a patient is identified as complying with these guideline recommendations(3), the most appropriate timing of the implantation is unknown with a double-edged sword decision for implant: too early might expose the patient to possible complications whereas too late might have a detrimental outcome.
METHODS
- In 426 patients (group A), the AE was documented during aborted CA while in 252 patients (group B) the AE was documented from an ICD implanted prophylactically following conventional class IIa or IIb indications(3) (75% of patients) or non-class IIa or IIb indications (25% of patients)(2).
- Group B patients comprised the study group of the present study.
- The study was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of all participating institutions.
Methods.
- SABRUS is an international survey on 678 BrS-patients who experienced arrhythmic event (AE) including 252 patients in whom AE occurred after prophylactic ICD implantation.
- The median time-to-first appropriate ICD therapy was 24.8±2.8 months.
- A longer time was associated with a positive family history of sudden cardiac death (p<0.05).
- Two score models for prediction of <5 years to shock were built.
- Syncope and spontaneous type 1 Brugada-ECG correlated with a shorter time to ICD therapy.
DATA ACQUISITION.
- AE was defined as any sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia triggering appropriate ICD shock therapy, also known as Arrhythmic events.
- Taking into consideration the aforementioned patients’ characteristics predicting a time-to-shock < 5 years, their relative odds ratio, and parameter significance, two risks scores were built.
- One point is given for either prior syncope or the presence of a spontaneous type 1 Brugada-ECG, and for the gender augmented score - 2 points were added for female gender.
- A score of 0 was found in 50.0% of patients using the minimal score and in 46.4% of patients using the gender augmented score.
Time-to-shock.
- The literature regarding the time-to-first appropriate shock therapy in BrS patients implanted prophylactically with an ICD is scarce.
- In the present study which involved the largest cohort population with AEs documented after prophylactic ICD implantation (n=252), the median time-to-shock was 24.8 months.
- By multivariate logistic regression the presence of syncope was found to correlate with a shorter time-to-shock (19.5±2.5 months vs. 36.5±4.9 months in asymptomatic patients, P<0.001).
- One possible explanation could be a biased decision taken by the referring patient’s physician who considered a family history of SCD as a major risk factor.
- In their recent paper(9) the authors discussed several factors suggesting a more aggressive course of the disease in females.
Time-to-shock Score
- The time-to-shock score was created to help the identification of patients who will need an ICD implant with the shortest delays.
- Because female gender had a borderline significance (p=0.052), which could be a result of the low number of 17 females included in the study, the authors created two scores one including gender and one excluding it.
- Both scores showed high prediction rates for AE ≤ 5 years after ICD implant, yet the gender augmented score showed a more significant trend with a higher predictive value for the maximal score (85% for the maximal score in the minimal scoring system vs. 100% for the gender augmented system).
- The present study by nature is a retrospective cumulative analysis of results from the largest EP-centers with experience with BrS.
- Two factors (syncope and spontaneous type 1 BrS-ECG) were found to be associated with this time-to-shock delay.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
62 citations
9 citations
7 citations
6 citations
6 citations
References
2,109 citations
"Time-to-first appropriate shock in ..." refers background or methods in this paper
...When a patient is identified as complying with these guideline recommendations(3), the most appropriate timing of the...
[...]
...Present indications for prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with BrS-ECG include(3): 1) Spontaneous type 1 Brugada-ECG pattern and a history of syncope (class IIa indication); 2) Spontaneous or drug-induced type 1 Brugada-ECG with induction of ventricular fibrillation during programmed ventricular stimulation with 2 or 3 extrastimuli (class IIb indication)....
[...]
...In 426 patients (group A), the AE was documented during aborted CA while in 252 patients (group B) the AE was documented from an ICD implanted prophylactically following conventional class IIa or IIb indications(3) (75% of patients) or non-class IIa or IIb indications (25% of patients)(2)....
[...]
...In respect to the conventional indications of prophylactic ICD implantation (3), the shortest median time-to-shock was observed in the class IIa subgroup (17....
[...]
...When a patient is identified as complying with these guideline recommendations(3), the most appropriate timing of the implantation is unknown with a double-edged sword decision for implant: too early might expose the patient to possible complications whereas too late might have a detrimental outcome....
[...]
1,513 citations
945 citations
754 citations
425 citations