scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions

TL;DR: It is found that the boundaries of topological domains are enriched for the insulator binding protein CTCF, housekeeping genes, transfer RNAs and short interspersed element (SINE) retrotransposons, indicating that these factors may have a role in establishing the topological domain structure of the genome.
Abstract: The spatial organization of the genome is intimately linked to its biological function, yet our understanding of higher order genomic structure is coarse, fragmented and incomplete. In the nucleus of eukaryotic cells, interphase chromosomes occupy distinct chromosome territories, and numerous models have been proposed for how chromosomes fold within chromosome territories. These models, however, provide only few mechanistic details about the relationship between higher order chromatin structure and genome function. Recent advances in genomic technologies have led to rapid advances in the study of three-dimensional genome organization. In particular, Hi-C has been introduced as a method for identifying higher order chromatin interactions genome wide. Here we investigate the three-dimensional organization of the human and mouse genomes in embryonic stem cells and terminally differentiated cell types at unprecedented resolution. We identify large, megabase-sized local chromatin interaction domains, which we term 'topological domains', as a pervasive structural feature of the genome organization. These domains correlate with regions of the genome that constrain the spread of heterochromatin. The domains are stable across different cell types and highly conserved across species, indicating that topological domains are an inherent property of mammalian genomes. Finally, we find that the boundaries of topological domains are enriched for the insulator binding protein CTCF, housekeeping genes, transfer RNAs and short interspersed element (SINE) retrotransposons, indicating that these factors may have a role in establishing the topological domain structure of the genome.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
18 Dec 2014-Cell
TL;DR: In situ Hi-C is used to probe the 3D architecture of genomes, constructing haploid and diploid maps of nine cell types, identifying ∼10,000 loops that frequently link promoters and enhancers, correlate with gene activation, and show conservation across cell types and species.

5,945 citations


Cites background or methods or result from "Topological domains in mammalian ge..."

  • ...We found that most peak loci encompass a unique DNA site containing a CTCF-binding motif, to which all three proteins (CTCF, SMC3, and RAD21) were bound (5-fold enrichment)....

    [...]

  • ...On the other hand, the domains we observe are much smaller than the TADs (1 Mb) (Dixon et al., 2012) that have been reported in humans and mice on the basis of lower-resolution contact maps....

    [...]

  • ...Our in situ Hi-C protocol involves crosslinking cells with formaldehyde, permeabilizing them with nuclei intact, digesting DNA with a suitable 4-cutter restriction enzyme (such as MboI), filling the 50-overhangs while incorporating a biotinylated nucleotide, ligating the resulting blunt-end fragments, shearing the DNA, capturing the biotinylated ligation junctions with streptavidin beads, and analyzing the resulting fragments with paired-end sequencing (Figure 1A)....

    [...]

  • ...Because many of our loops demarcate domains, this observation is also consistent with studies suggesting that CTCF delimits structural and regulatory domains (Xie et al., 2007; Cuddapah et al., 2009; Dixon et al., 2012)....

    [...]

  • ...(C) Percent of peak loci bound versus fold enrichment for 76 DNA-binding proteins....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
Anshul Kundaje1, Wouter Meuleman2, Wouter Meuleman1, Jason Ernst3, Misha Bilenky4, Angela Yen1, Angela Yen2, Alireza Heravi-Moussavi4, Pouya Kheradpour1, Pouya Kheradpour2, Zhizhuo Zhang2, Zhizhuo Zhang1, Jianrong Wang2, Jianrong Wang1, Michael J. Ziller2, Viren Amin5, John W. Whitaker, Matthew D. Schultz6, Lucas D. Ward2, Lucas D. Ward1, Abhishek Sarkar2, Abhishek Sarkar1, Gerald Quon1, Gerald Quon2, Richard Sandstrom7, Matthew L. Eaton1, Matthew L. Eaton2, Yi-Chieh Wu2, Yi-Chieh Wu1, Andreas R. Pfenning1, Andreas R. Pfenning2, Xinchen Wang1, Xinchen Wang2, Melina Claussnitzer1, Melina Claussnitzer2, Yaping Liu2, Yaping Liu1, Cristian Coarfa5, R. Alan Harris5, Noam Shoresh2, Charles B. Epstein2, Elizabeta Gjoneska1, Elizabeta Gjoneska2, Danny Leung8, Wei Xie8, R. David Hawkins8, Ryan Lister6, Chibo Hong9, Philippe Gascard9, Andrew J. Mungall4, Richard A. Moore4, Eric Chuah4, Angela Tam4, Theresa K. Canfield7, R. Scott Hansen7, Rajinder Kaul7, Peter J. Sabo7, Mukul S. Bansal2, Mukul S. Bansal10, Mukul S. Bansal1, Annaick Carles4, Jesse R. Dixon8, Kai How Farh2, Soheil Feizi2, Soheil Feizi1, Rosa Karlic11, Ah Ram Kim2, Ah Ram Kim1, Ashwinikumar Kulkarni12, Daofeng Li13, Rebecca F. Lowdon13, Ginell Elliott13, Tim R. Mercer14, Shane Neph7, Vitor Onuchic5, Paz Polak15, Paz Polak2, Nisha Rajagopal8, Pradipta R. Ray12, Richard C Sallari1, Richard C Sallari2, Kyle Siebenthall7, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong1, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong2, Michael Stevens13, Robert E. Thurman7, Jie Wu16, Bo Zhang13, Xin Zhou13, Arthur E. Beaudet5, Laurie A. Boyer1, Philip L. De Jager15, Philip L. De Jager2, Peggy J. Farnham17, Susan J. Fisher9, David Haussler18, Steven J.M. Jones19, Steven J.M. Jones4, Wei Li5, Marco A. Marra4, Michael T. McManus9, Shamil R. Sunyaev15, Shamil R. Sunyaev2, James A. Thomson20, Thea D. Tlsty9, Li-Huei Tsai2, Li-Huei Tsai1, Wei Wang, Robert A. Waterland5, Michael Q. Zhang21, Lisa Helbling Chadwick22, Bradley E. Bernstein15, Bradley E. Bernstein6, Bradley E. Bernstein2, Joseph F. Costello9, Joseph R. Ecker11, Martin Hirst4, Alexander Meissner2, Aleksandar Milosavljevic5, Bing Ren8, John A. Stamatoyannopoulos7, Ting Wang13, Manolis Kellis2, Manolis Kellis1 
19 Feb 2015-Nature
TL;DR: It is shown that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

5,037 citations

01 Feb 2015
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression.
Abstract: The reference human genome sequence set the stage for studies of genetic variation and its association with human disease, but epigenomic studies lack a similar reference. To address this need, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium generated the largest collection so far of human epigenomes for primary cells and tissues. Here we describe the integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes generated as part of the programme, profiled for histone modification patterns, DNA accessibility, DNA methylation and RNA expression. We establish global maps of regulatory elements, define regulatory modules of coordinated activity, and their likely activators and repressors. We show that disease- and trait-associated genetic variants are enriched in tissue-specific epigenomic marks, revealing biologically relevant cell types for diverse human traits, and providing a resource for interpreting the molecular basis of human disease. Our results demonstrate the central role of epigenomic information for understanding gene regulation, cellular differentiation and human disease.

4,409 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) as discussed by the authors form extensive networks of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes with numerous chromatin regulators and then target these enzymatic activities to appropriate locations in the genome.
Abstract: The central dogma of gene expression is that DNA is transcribed into messenger RNAs, which in turn serve as the template for protein synthesis. The discovery of extensive transcription of large RNA transcripts that do not code for proteins, termed long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), provides an important new perspective on the centrality of RNA in gene regulation. Here, we discuss genome-scale strategies to discover and characterize lncRNAs. An emerging theme from multiple model systems is that lncRNAs form extensive networks of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes with numerous chromatin regulators and then target these enzymatic activities to appropriate locations in the genome. Consistent with this notion, lncRNAs can function as modular scaffolds to specify higher-order organization in RNP complexes and in chromatin states. The importance of these modes of regulation is underscored by the newly recognized roles of long RNAs for proper gene control across all kingdoms of life.

3,075 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
11 Apr 2013-Cell
TL;DR: In this article, the ESC master transcription factors form unusual enhancer domains at most genes that control the pluripotent state, called super-enhancers, which consist of clusters of enhancers that are densely occupied by the master regulators and Mediator.

2,978 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: By comparing the chromatin-modification profiles and DNA methylomes in hESCs and primary fibroblasts, it is found that nearly one-third of the genome differs in chromatin structure.

810 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Five distinct chromatin domains are uncovered that suggest potential new models of CTCF function in chromatin organization and transcriptional control, and demarcate chromatin-nuclear membrane attachments and influence proper gene expression through extensive cross-talk between promoters and regulatory elements.
Abstract: Mammalian genomes are viewed as functional organizations that orchestrate spatial and temporal gene regulation. CTCF, the most characterized insulator-binding protein, has been implicated as a key genome organizer. However, little is known about CTCF-associated higher-order chromatin structures at a global scale. Here we applied chromatin interaction analysis by paired-end tag (ChIA-PET) sequencing to elucidate the CTCF-chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. From this analysis, we identified 1,480 cis- and 336 trans-interacting loci with high reproducibility and precision. Associating these chromatin interaction loci with their underlying epigenetic states, promoter activities, enhancer binding and nuclear lamina occupancy, we uncovered five distinct chromatin domains that suggest potential new models of CTCF function in chromatin organization and transcriptional control. Specifically, CTCF interactions demarcate chromatin-nuclear membrane attachments and influence proper gene expression through extensive cross-talk between promoters and regulatory elements. This highly complex nuclear organization offers insights toward the unifying principles that govern genome plasticity and function.

642 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of corrected human lymphoblast contact maps provides genome-wide evidence for interchromosomal aggregation of active chromatin marks, including DNase-hypersensitive sites and transcriptionally active foci.
Abstract: Amos Tanay and Eitan Yaffe report methods to correct biases in the Hi-C method for mapping chromosomal contacts on a genome-wide scale. Their analysis of Hi-C data shows interchromosomal aggregation of hypersensitive sites, transcriptionally active foci and other epigenetic markers of active chromatin.

620 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that differentiated tissues show surprisingly large K9-modified regions (up to 4.9 Mb), which are large organized chromatin K9 modifications (LOCKs) and may provide a cell type–heritable mechanism for phenotypic plasticity in development and disease.
Abstract: Higher eukaryotes must adapt a totipotent genome to specialized cell types with stable but limited functions. One potential mechanism for lineage restriction is changes in chromatin, and differentiation-related chromatin changes have been observed for individual genes. We have taken a genome-wide view of histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation (H3K9Me2) and find that differentiated tissues show surprisingly large K9-modified regions (up to 4.9 Mb). These regions are highly conserved between human and mouse and are differentiation specific, covering only approximately 4% of the genome in undifferentiated mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, compared to 31% in differentiated ES cells, approximately 46% in liver and approximately 10% in brain. These modifications require histone methyltransferase G9a and are inversely related to expression of genes within the regions. We term these regions large organized chromatin K9 modifications (LOCKs). LOCKs are substantially lost in cancer cell lines, and they may provide a cell type-heritable mechanism for phenotypic plasticity in development and disease.

582 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The results reveal evolutionarily conserved aspects of developmentally regulated replication programs in mammals, demonstrate the power of replication profiling to distinguish closely related cell types, and strongly support the hypothesis that replication timing domains are spatially compartmentalized structural and functional units of three-dimensional chromosomal architecture.
Abstract: To identify evolutionarily conserved features of replication timing and their relationship to epigenetic properties, we profiled replication timing genome-wide in four human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines, hESC-derived neural precursor cells (NPCs), lymphoblastoid cells, and two human induced pluripotent stem cell lines (hiPSCs), and compared them with related mouse cell types. Results confirm the conservation of coordinately replicated megabase-sized "replication domains" punctuated by origin-suppressed regions. Differentiation-induced replication timing changes in both species occur in 400- to 800-kb units and are similarly coordinated with transcription changes. A surprising degree of cell-type-specific conservation in replication timing was observed across regions of conserved synteny, despite considerable species variation in the alignment of replication timing to isochore GC/LINE-1 content. Notably, hESC replication timing profiles were significantly more aligned to mouse epiblast-derived stem cells (mEpiSCs) than to mouse ESCs. Comparison with epigenetic marks revealed a signature of chromatin modifications at the boundaries of early replicating domains and a remarkably strong link between replication timing and spatial proximity of chromatin as measured by Hi-C analysis. Thus, early and late initiation of replication occurs in spatially separate nuclear compartments, but rarely within the intervening chromatin. Moreover, cell-type-specific conservation of the replication program implies conserved developmental changes in spatial organization of chromatin. Together, our results reveal evolutionarily conserved aspects of developmentally regulated replication programs in mammals, demonstrate the power of replication profiling to distinguish closely related cell types, and strongly support the hypothesis that replication timing domains are spatially compartmentalized structural and functional units of three-dimensional chromosomal architecture.

567 citations

Related Papers (5)