Tracing the evolution of dust-obscured activity using sub-millimetre galaxy populations from STUDIES and AS2UDS
Summary (5 min read)
Introduction
- Key words: galaxies: evolution – galaxies: starburst – infrared: galaxies.
- These surveys confirmed the cosmological significance of far-infrared-luminous galaxies, in particular their potentially significant contribution to the starformation rate density at high redshifts (see Madau & Dickinson 2014).
- While covering huge areas, these surveys are limited in sensitivity due to the large beam size and resulting bright confusion limit,1 which makes it challenging to detect all but the brightest sources at z 1 (Symeonidis, Page & Seymour 2011, although see Shu et al.
- The identification of differences in the physical properties of SMGs selected in the different sub-millimetre wavebands from such studies have been limited by their modest sample sizes and also their biases towards brighter sources due to the sensitivity limits at 450μm.
2.1 Photometric coverage
- STUDIES is a SCUBA-2 450-μm imaging survey within the CANDELS region in the COSMOS field.
- Briefly, the data from STUDIES, combined with archival data taken by Geach et al. (2013) and Casey et al. (2013), yields the deepest single-dish map currently available at 450μm, reaching a 1-σ noise level of 0.65 mJy.
- The 850-μm flux densities of the 450-μm-selected STUDIES sources were obtained from the 850-μm map at the 450- μm positions.
- The authors provide a brief description of the counterpart identification and multi-wavelength photometric data available for the sample from UV to radio wavelengths, which is then used to model the SEDs of the sources.
2.1.1 Counterpart identification
- The identification of optical counterparts for the STUDIES 450- μm sources is described in Lim et al. (2020).
- Briefly, the 450-μm sources were matched with the VLA-COSMOS 3-GHz catalogue (Smolčić et al. 2017) using a 4 arcsec search radius (set by the JCMT 450-μm beam) yielding ∼1 per cent false positive rate (based on the probability of false matches using the number densities of both catalogues).
- In total 109 of the counterparts have IRAC detections.
2.1.2 Far-infrared to radio observations
- To constrain the SED of each galaxy at radio wavelengths the authors utilize 1.4 and 3-GHz data from the Very Large Array (VLA)-COSMOS Large Project (Schinnerer et al. 2010; Smolčić et al. 2017).
- Hence, to better constrain the shape of the far-infrared SEDs for the galaxies in their sample, and so improve the constraints on the far-infrared luminosities, the authors include observations with the Spectral and Photometric Imaging Receiver (SPIRE: Griffin et al. 2010) and the Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS: Poglitsch et al. 2010) on the Herschel Space Observatory.
- The deblending of the SPIRE maps used positional priors for sources based on the 3-GHz and 24-μm (see below) catalogues, as well as machinelearning identified SMG counterparts from An et al. (2019) (see Section 2.1.1).
- The uncertainties on the flux densities (and limits) are found by attempting to recover model sources injected into the maps (see Swinbank et al. 2014 for details), and yield typical 3-σ detection limits of 7.0 and 8.0 mJy at 250 and 350μm, respectively.
2.1.3 Optical to near-/mid-infrared observations
- To model the stellar SEDs of the counterparts to their 450-μm sources, the authors require the photometry in the optical/infrared bands.
- For the u∗Bgrizy bands the authors adopt the photometry from COSMOS2015 (Laigle et al. 2016) catalogue.
- In an equivalent manner to Simpson et al. (2020), the authors measure 2 arcsec diameter aperture photometry at the positions of each SMG in each band.
- For each filter, the correction is determined by convolving the filter response with the scaled extinction curve.
2.2 SED fitting model
- To derive the physical properties of the STUDIES SMGs, the authors employ MAGPHYS+photo-z (da Cunha et al. 2015; Battisti et al. 2019) to model the SEDs from optical to radio wavelengths, using the available photometry in 24 bands.
- This approach allows for a simple comparison with similar fits to other 450, 850-μm, and ALMA samples.
- The authors stress that it is likely that the dust emission from the sources in their sample is not optically thin in the far-infrared and T MBBd and Md (through strong dependence on T MBBd ) are affected by the dust opacity assumptions.
- The authors then re-run MAGPHYS+photo-z with the adjusted photometry to obtain the bestfitting SEDs (all SEDs are shown in Fig. 1b), redshift and physical properties for the 450-μm sources.
- The authors note that, for consistency, they use the MAGPHYS+photo-z derived photometric redshifts for all sources in the analysis in this paper.
3 A NA LY SIS AND RESULTS
- The authors investigate the broad photometric properties and the derived physical properties of the 450-μm sample based on their MAGPHYS+photo-z analysis of their SEDs.
- The authors compare the results of the 450-μm-selected sample to an 850-μm-selected sample, AS2UDS (Stach et al. 2019), which has been analysed in a consistent manner by fitting MAGPHYS+photo-z to the available photometry in 22 bands (D20).
- AS2UDS is a follow-up survey of sources detected in the SCUBA2 Cosmology Legacy Survey (S2CLS; Geach et al. 2017) 850-μm map of the ∼0.9 deg2 UKIDSS UDS field and provides a large homogeneously selected sample of ALMA-identified SMGs.
- Throughout the paper, the authors will refer to this as the 850-μm sample (they note that this ALMA selection formally corresponds to 870μm, which is the wavelength used in the analysis).
3.1 Photometric properties of 450-μm sources
- Before the authors discuss the physical properties of the STUDIES 450- μm SMGs in detail, they first investigate the observed and rest-frame optical and infrared colour properties of the sample.
- The authors overlay the track of the composite SED of the 450-μm sample (further discussed in Section 3.3) as a function of redshift, which demonstrates that IRAC colours indicative of AGN are degenerate with those expected for dusty star-forming galaxies at z 2–3, where many members of this population lie.
- The authors indicate the median for each sample as a large circle in the respective colour, with the 16–84th percentile range shown as the black error bar.
- The authors note that the composite SED of the 450-μm sample has bluer IRAC colours at z 2 compared to the 850-μm composite (see also Section 3.3.2).
3.2 Redshift distribution
- The redshift distribution is a fundamental quantity providing constraints on formation models for the given population and is also essential for reliable derivation of their intrinsic properties and evolutionary trends.
- To compare the 450 and 850μm selections in more detail, the authors take advantage of their well-defined and almost effectively complete redshift distribution to investigate the space density of the 450-μmselected population.
- Thus, the authors estimate the survey area for each of the sources by calculating the area within the SCUBA-2 map within which each SMG would be detectable at SNR 5, given their 450-μm flux density, using the 450-μm RMS map from Lim et al. (2020).
- The authors test whether the two distributions are significantly different by using a χ2 test to compare the space density values at each bin including the errors.
3.3.1 Far-infrared properties
- As the majority of the emission from these dusty systems is coming from the far-infrared, the authors begin by investigating the dust properties of the SMGs by deriving their far-infrared luminosities.
- The selection trends in Fig. 4(a), together with the evolution of the far-infrared luminosity function explains the lower redshift distribution of the 450-μm sources in comparison to 850-μm selected sources (e.g. Béthermin et al. 2015).
- In agreement with the photometric properties of the samples (see Section 3.1 and Fig 2), their dust mass results in Fig. 4(b), suggest that 450-μm selection is sensitive to lower dust mass sources at lower redshifts.
- The 450-μm sample has a systematically higher characteristic dust temperature than the 850-μm sample.
3.3.2 Optical/near-infrared properties
- The rest-frame UV/optical/near-infrared features in the SED are dominated by the stellar emission, thus physical properties such as stellar mass and dust attenuation can be inferred.
- The median dust attenuation is significantly lower than the AS2UDS value of AV = 2.89 ± 0.04 mag, as also suggested from the comparison of the rest-frame UV slopes in Fig. 5(a).
- Again, the authors highlight the reliability of the sections of the SED for each sample with lines of variable thickness.
4 D ISCUSSION
- So far, the authors have investigated the physical properties of the full SNR ≥ 5 450-μm-selected sample and compared these to those selected at 850μm.
- As seen in Fig. 4, selection at different wavelengths (in populations whose space density peaks at different redshifts, Fig. 3b) leads to a range of potential selection effects.
- The authors note that the median rest-frame wavelength for the samples at z = 1–2 and z = 3–4 differs by ∼5 per cent, but they confirm that precisely matching the redshift distributions to achieve perfect agreement in their median wavelengths does not change their results.
- With both samples selected at the same rest-frame wavelength, λrest ∼ 180μm, and occupying the same parameter space in dust mass (roughly equating to sub-millimetre flux limit), the authors examine whether there are any physical differences between identical far-infrared-selected galaxies as the age of the Universe doubled between z ∼ 3.5 and z ∼ 1.5.
4.1 Comparing rest-frame-selected populations
- First, the authors look at the overall properties of their z ∼ 1.5 and z ∼ 3.5 samples by investigating their composite SEDs in Fig. 5(b).
- The uncertainty is then estimated by taking the 16th and 84th percentile values at each wavelength.
- Overall, the authors conclude that the z ∼ 1.5 sources have properties lying between those of the local templates of Arp 220 and M82, while the z ∼ 3.5 sources are more extreme than Arp 220 in terms of their low rest-frame optical to far-infrared luminosity ratios.
- Thus, the brighter optical SED of the z ∼ 1.5 sample arises from the combination of both slightly higher stellar mass and lower dust attenuation.
4.1.1 Gas fraction and star-formation efficiency
- The authors analysis suggests that at z ∼ 1.5 far-infrared selected galaxies are different to those at z ∼ 3.5, in both the far-infrared and optical regimes, even when selected at the same rest-frame wavelength and the same dust mass limit.
- The authors explore two approaches to determine the appropriate value for δgdr.
- The results indicate that the star-formation is slower at z ∼ 1.5, while at z ∼ 3.5 the more gas-rich galaxies are forming stars more rapidly, and so consuming the larger gas reservoirs in a comparable amount of time.
- D20 showed that the 850-μm SMGs are broadly consistent with this homologous and homogeneous population model of centrally illuminated dust clouds, with the dust continuum size of SMGs broadly following the expected trend with far-infrared luminosity-to-gas mass ratio.
- The authors note that the median dust mass for their z ∼ 3.5 sample is, on average, two times higher than for the z ∼ 1.5 population.
4.2 Dust properties of far-infrared-selected galaxies
- Dust, while a small component of the overall baryonic mass of a galaxy, is a useful tracer of the ISM.
- (a) Gas fraction as a function of redshift.
- The binned median values are shown as large circles, where the authors split the larger z ∼ 3.5 sample into three independent bins of dust mass, and the errors are derived by a bootstrap method.
4.2.1 Dust mass function
- The authors calculate the dust mass function for the z ∼ 1.5 sources using an accessible volume method: φ(Md) Md = (1/Vi), where φ(M) M is the number density of sources with dust masses between M and M+ M and Vi is the co-moving volume within which the i-th source would be detected in a given dust mass bin.
- The difference in the shape of their two dust mass functions indicates that the characteristic dust mass of the high-redshift sources is higher than that of the low-redshift sample.
4.2.2 Dust mass density
- Given the apparently different shapes of the dust mass function in their two λrest ∼ 180-μm-matched samples, the authors opt to assess the evolutionary differences in the dust properties of galaxy populations using integrated dust mass density as the most robust measurement available.
- It does not follow the observational results from other studies at z 1.
- To investigate how the physical properties of infrared luminous galaxies evolve with redshift, the authors also select z = 1–2 450-μm sources and z = 3–4 850-μm sources both with Md ≥ 2 × 108 M , to construct rest-frame wavelength (λrest ∼ 180μm) matched subsets.
- UD acknowledges the support of Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) studentship (ST/R504725/1).
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
262 citations
76 citations
37 citations
27 citations
27 citations
References
10,384 citations
8,218 citations
"Tracing the evolution of dust-obscu..." refers methods in this paper
...Thus, the physical properties of the two samples can be investigated for any differences arising from the different wavelength selection. magphys+photo-𝑧 uses stellar population models from Bruzual & Charlot (2003) and a Chabrier (2003) IMF....
[...]
6,643 citations
5,370 citations
3,104 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
Q2. How do the authors estimate the gas-to-dust ratios for the z ?
In addition, as gas-to-dust mass ratio is expected to vary with stellar mass and redshift, the authors can also estimate the expected dust-to-gas ratios for the median stellar mass at the median redshift of each sample.
Q3. How much is the systematic offset between the dust masses retrieved using these two different methods?
The systematic offset between the dust masses retrieved using these two different methods is 10 per cent, which is within the uncertainty of the MAGPHYS+photo-z dust mass values.
Q4. What is the flux density distribution of the sources in the prior catalogue?
The observed flux density distribution is fitted with beam-sized components at the position of a given source in the prior catalogue using a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Q5. How many uncertainties were calculated on the dust mass of the two samples?
The uncertainties on the dust functions of both samples were calculated by resampling the dust mass and redshift probability distributions to construct multiple dust mass functions.
Q6. What is the effect of the dust opacity assumptions?
the authors stress that it is likely that the dust emission from the sources in their sample is not optically thin in the far-infrared and T MBBd and Md (through strong dependence on T MBBd ) are affected by the dust opacity assumptions.
Q7. How do the authors determine the median gas mass fraction of fgas?
The authors derive a median gas mass fraction of fgas = 0.19 ± 0.06 with a 68th percentile range of fgas = 0.10–0.58, assuming a gas-to-dust ratio of 100.
Q8. How do the authors calculate the dust mass density for the rest 180m sample?
The authors calculate the total dust mass density for the λrest ∼ 180- μm-matched samples at z ∼ 1.5 and z ∼ 3.5 by combining the dust mass density estimates extrapolated down to Md ∼104 M from the best-fitting Schechter function for their respective dust mass functions.
Q9. What is the typical offset for any given physical property?
The authors find that the typical systematic offset for any given physical property (SFR, LFIR, M∗, Md, AV) is ∼10 per cent, which is within the typical uncertainties.
Q10. What is the flux density of the AS2UDS SMGs?
As seen in Fig. 3(b), the space density for the S850 ≥ 3.6 mJy subset of the AS2UDS SMGs is significantly lower than the 450- μm population, however, this is primarily due to the different flux density and luminosity limits of the two studies.
Q11. What is the median stellar mass of the 850-m sample?
The median stellar mass of the 850-μm sample is M∗ = (1.26 ± 0.05) × 1011 M , similar to the 450-μm population (but typically seen at an earlier epoch).
Q12. How do the authors derive the dust mass density for a sample with Md 2.0?
The authors derive a dust mass density of ρ = (2.6 ± 0.5 ) × 104 M Mpc−3 at z ∼ 1.5 and ρ = (2.41 ± 0.13 ) × 104 M Mpc−3 at z ∼ 3.5, for a sample with Md ≥ 2.0× 108 M .