scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Posted Content

Transparency and Financial Regulation in the European Union: Crisis and Complexity

TL;DR: The European Union has made significant structural changes to financial regulation, and the increasing institutional complexity of the EU means that sources of information about the EU's policies have increased in number, adding to problems of information overload as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Lisbon Treaty came into force in the European Union as the global financial crisis developed into a European sovereign debt crisis. Transparency is a component of accountability, and a means of addressing the EU's democratic deficit. The Lisbon Treaty established a new commitment to transparency within the EU. However, urgency and complexity make transparency harder to achieve, and the European Union has not achieved transparency with respect to urgent matters such as the financial and sovereign debt crises and complex issues such as financial regulation. The EU has made significant structural changes to financial regulation, and the increasing institutional complexity of the EU means that sources of information about the EU’s policies have increased in number, adding to problems of information overload. In response to the financial crisis the EU has introduced many new rules of financial regulation. At the same time, although multilingualism is a core feature of the EU, the EU’s new financial authorities issue technical consultations only in English. Because the EU has committed itself to transparency in the Treaties the EU's institutions must work to increase citizens' ability to navigate the information which is available to them. And the EU's institutions should do more to increase access to information about the development of EU policy, by implementing the EU commitment to multilingualism more effectively, and by not allowing crises and technical matters to divert them from the imperatives of transparency.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive overview of post-crisis regulatory research publications is presented, which can be roughly divided into three overarching clusters: publications identifying causes of the crisis, articles focusing on policy and reform reactions, and literature investigating whether these reforms fit their purpose.

37 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: The lack of coordination and systematization in activities of state financial control authorities does not allow optimizing the disposal and use of state resources, it stimulates the deepening of financial crisis in domestic economy.
Abstract: Reforming state financial control after Ukraine gained independence was characterized by significant changes, but they had a spontaneous and non-systemic character. Due to uncoordinated transformation, the financial control system still spends disproportionately large resources on its content, retains many features of the postSoviet period, especially in organizational and functional structures, the methods of work of control bodies, and therefore morally obsolete and practically does not provide necessary progress in stabilizing the financial and budgetary discipline in the state. As practice has shown, work organization of state financial control bodies requires significant resource costs (both labor and financial). The lack of coordination and systematization in activities of state financial control authorities does not allow optimizing the disposal and use of state financial resources, it stimulates the deepening of financial crisis in domestic economy.

13 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a comprehensive overview of post-crisis regulatory research publications is presented, which can be roughly divided into three overarching clusters: publications identifying causes of the crisis, articles focusing on policy and reform reactions, and literature investigating whether these reforms fit their purpose.

37 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2017
TL;DR: The lack of coordination and systematization in activities of state financial control authorities does not allow optimizing the disposal and use of state resources, it stimulates the deepening of financial crisis in domestic economy.
Abstract: Reforming state financial control after Ukraine gained independence was characterized by significant changes, but they had a spontaneous and non-systemic character. Due to uncoordinated transformation, the financial control system still spends disproportionately large resources on its content, retains many features of the postSoviet period, especially in organizational and functional structures, the methods of work of control bodies, and therefore morally obsolete and practically does not provide necessary progress in stabilizing the financial and budgetary discipline in the state. As practice has shown, work organization of state financial control bodies requires significant resource costs (both labor and financial). The lack of coordination and systematization in activities of state financial control authorities does not allow optimizing the disposal and use of state financial resources, it stimulates the deepening of financial crisis in domestic economy.

13 citations