Tuning Singlet Fission in π-Bridge-π Chromophores
Summary (1 min read)
KEYWORDS: Singlet Fission; Homoconjugated Dimers; Non-Conjugated, Organic Electronics, Pentacene Dimers, Electron Spin Resonance.
- ABSTRACT: We have designed a series of pentacene dimers separated by homoconjugated or non-conjugated bridges that exhibit fast and efficient intramolecular singlet exciton fission (iSF).the authors.
- 31,32 Given the sensitivity of SF to structure, it remains unclear how through-bond interactions promote fast and efficient singlet fission, especially focusing on the most basic pentacene dimer model.
- In homoconjugated dimers, the two pentacene chromophores are separated by a saturated sp3 carbon, thus the pentacenepentacene coupling and/or electron delocalization is expected to be weaker than in conjugated systems (such as BP1, Figure 1).
- The authors postulate that this π-sigma-π bonding scheme will make the excited state dynamics much less sensitive to subtle variations in the geometry of the bridge as compared to analogous conjugated dimers.
- 11 Complete details of their synthesis and characterization are given in the supporting information.
BP1
- 11 From inspection, the authors clearly see that the electronic coupling between the chromophores is significantly affected by through-bond interactions; singlet fission in BP1, where pentacenes are connected through four sp2 hybridized carbons, has a time constant similar to homoconjugated dimers, where pentacene chromophores are separated by just one sp3 hybridized carbon.
- The authors establish that singlet fission is operative, producing triplet pairs as opposed to free triplet generation by intersystem crossing, by correlating transient absorption and electron spin resonance studies (Figure 5).
- Like other iSF dimers, transient absorption studies show that the triplet population decays biexponentially, indicating the presence of triplet pairs (TT) with an enhanced recombination rate (Figure 6) and a minority population of free triplets decay with the expected rate for an individual triplet.
- The biexponential dynamics in the TA experiments were further probed by transient electronic spin resonance (tr-ESR) measurements.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
- Supporting Information The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
- Experimental methods, including details of the transient absorption spectroscopy and photosensitization experiments, synthetic details, electron spin resonance experiments and characterization of compounds used in this study.
- AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author *dane.mccamey@unsw.edu.au *msfeir@bnl.gov *lcampos@columbia.edu.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
- L.M.C. acknowledges support from the Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Program (Award N00014-15-12532) and Cottrell Scholar Award.
- This research used resources of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials, which is a U.S. DOE Office of Science Facility, at Brookhaven Na- tional Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704.
- This work used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment , which is supported by National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562.
- MJYT acknowledges receipt of an ARENA Postdoctoral Fellowship and a Marie Curie Individual Fellowship.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
865 citations
156 citations
119 citations
114 citations
106 citations
References
1,363 citations
849 citations
431 citations
403 citations
337 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
Q2. What is the key prediction from this study?
One of the key predictions from this study was that very weak chromophore-chromophore coupling could permit ultrafast singlet fission.
Q3. What is the reason for the redshift in the high-energy features in BP1?
The redshift in the high-energy features in BP1 is potentially due to greater interactions between the chromophores through a conjugated linker.
Q4. What is the way to add a singlet pair to a solid-state?
In the solid-state, through-bond singlet fission can be complemented by through-space singlet fission, adding an additional SF channel.
Q5. What is the first family of materials with fast rates of iSF?
While it has been observed in twisted dimers that reducing the coupling between pentacene chromophores preferentially extends the triplet pair lifetime,35 this is the first family of materials with fast rates of iSF, and drastically different rates of triplet pair recombination.
Q6. What is the recent study suggesting that singlet fission occurs by a direct mechanism?
A recent computational study suggests that singlet fission occurs by a direct mechanism in bipentacene, in contrast to the charge transfer mediated (stepwise) mechanism widely perceived to be dominant in intermolecular singlet fission of crystalline pentacene.
Q7. How did Liu et al. design tetracene trimer?
12,33 Recently, Liu et al. designed tetracene trimer through linear oligomerization which resulted in greatly enhanced iSF yield (96%) relative to a similar dimer.
Q8. How long does iSF take to recombinate a triplet pair?
Despite the faster time constants for triplet pair generation as compared to conjugated BP1, triplet pair recombination is > 10 times slower in EBD.
Q9. Why are these materials distinctive among reported iSF compounds?
These materials are distinctive among reported iSF compounds because they exist in the unexplored regime of close spatial proximity but weak electronic coupling between the singlet exciton and triplet pair states.
Q10. What is the reason for the slow rate of singlet fission in twisted dimers?
Such conclusion is further supported by the fact that singlet fission is slower in twisted dimers that lack bridging units, where conjugation is decreased due to reduced overlap of the pi orbitals.
Q11. What is the effect of the orthogonal connected dimers?
orthogonally connected dimers reported by Lukman et al. resulted in ultrafast singlet fission and were particularly sensitive to the polarity of the medium.
Q12. How do the authors quantify the yields of iSF?
This allows us to quantify the yields using kinetic arguments, since the only significant competing relaxation process is a 12.3 ns radiative decay.
Q13. What are the biexponential decay dynamics in toluene?
These biexponential decay dynamics have also been observed in other systems11,14,39,40 and do not change as a function of concentration or other experimental parameters.
Q14. What is the absorption/emission structure of the triplets?
The absorption/emission structure is indicative of the selective population of T0, as is expected for triplets generated by fission.