Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior.
Citations
758 citations
Cites background or methods from "Unethical behavior in the name of t..."
...To illustrate this definitional approach, consider two field studies reported by Umphress, Bingham, and Mitchell (2010)....
[...]
...Consistent with social exchange theory, Umphress et al. (2010) found that people who identify with their employer are more likely to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior, especially when they have positive reciprocity beliefs....
[...]
...In two field studies, Umphress, Bingham, and Mitchell (2010) found that employees who identified with their organization were more likely to display unethical pro-organization behaviors, such as lying, exaggerating, or concealing information....
[...]
630 citations
Cites background from "Unethical behavior in the name of t..."
...Umphress et al. (2010) theorized and found that employees who held a strong organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs were more likely to engage in unethical behavior that is intended to benefit the organization in some way (which they term unethical pro-organizational…...
[...]
...On the other hand, strong organizational identification might influence employees to engage in behaviors that attempt to protect the organization at whatever the cost (Umphress et al., 2010)....
[...]
416 citations
382 citations
References
52,531 citations
29,764 citations
19,019 citations
16,420 citations
"Unethical behavior in the name of t..." refers methods in this paper
...Fit was assessed with the root-mean-square error of approximation and the comparative fit index (Bentler & Bonnett, 1990)....
[...]
16,278 citations