Universal Dependency Annotation for Multilingual Parsing
Citations
1,111 citations
Cites background or methods from "Universal Dependency Annotation for..."
...The Google Universal Dependency Treebank (UDT) project (McDonald et al., 2013) was the first attempt to combine the Stanford dependencies and the Google universal part-of-speech tags into a universal annotation scheme: treebanks were released for 6 languages in 2013 (English, French, German,…...
[...]
...Google dependency scheme (Universal Dependency Treebanks) (McDonald et al., 2013), the Google universal partof-speech tags (Petrov et al....
[...]
...The Google Universal Dependency Treebank (UDT) project (McDonald et al., 2013) was the first attempt to combine the Stanford dependencies and the Google universal part-of-speech tags into a universal annotation scheme: treebanks were released for 6 languages in 2013 (English, French, German, Spanish, Swedish and Korean) and for 11 languages in 2014 (Brazilian Portuguese, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Spanish and Swedish)....
[...]
...It combines the (universal) Stanford dependencies (de Marneffe et al., 2006; de Marneffe and Manning, 2008; de Marneffe et al., 2014), the universal sv: en katt jagar råttor och möss det nsubj conj dobj conj da: en kat jager rotter og mus nsubj ? dobj cc conj en: a cat chases rats and mice det nsubj dobj cc conj Figure 1: Divergent annotation of parallel structures Google dependency scheme (Universal Dependency Treebanks) (McDonald et al., 2013), the Google universal partof-speech tags (Petrov et al., 2012), and the Interset interlingua for morphosyntactic tag sets (Zeman, 2008) used in the HamleDT treebanks (a project that transforms existing treebanks under a common annotation scheme, Zeman et al. 2012)....
[...]
...…rats and mice det nsubj dobj cc conj Figure 1: Divergent annotation of parallel structures Google dependency scheme (Universal Dependency Treebanks) (McDonald et al., 2013), the Google universal partof-speech tags (Petrov et al., 2012), and the Interset interlingua for morphosyntactic tag sets…...
[...]
625 citations
490 citations
457 citations
Cites background from "Universal Dependency Annotation for..."
...0.0, used in the SANCL shared task, and Stanford Dependencies v3....
[...]
...We emphasize the lexicalist stance of both most work in NLP and the syntactic theory on which Stanford Dependencies is based, and hence argue for a particular treatment of compounding and morphology....
[...]
...Universal Stanford Dependencies: A Cross-Linguistic Typology....
[...]
...In this paper, we attempt a (post-hoc) reconstruction of the underlying typology of the Stanford Dependencies representation....
[...]
...We emphasize the lexicalist stance of the Stanford Dependencies, which leads to a particular, partially new treatment of compounding, prepositions, and morphology....
[...]
355 citations
Cites background from "Universal Dependency Annotation for..."
...This assumption is motivated by the development of unified annotation for many languages (Nivre et al., 2015; Petrov et al., 2012; McDonald et al., 2013)....
[...]
References
8,377 citations
"Universal Dependency Annotation for..." refers methods in this paper
...6.8) (Klein and Manning, 2003) to convert the Wall Street Journal section of the Penn Treebank (Marcus et al., 1993) to basic dependency trees, including punctuation and with the copula verb as head in copula constructions....
[...]
3,291 citations
"Universal Dependency Annotation for..." refers methods in this paper
...8) (Klein and Manning, 2003) to convert the Wall Street Journal section of the Penn Treebank (Marcus et al....
[...]
2,503 citations
"Universal Dependency Annotation for..." refers methods in this paper
...The Stanford typed dependencies for English (De Marneffe et al., 2006; de Marneffe and Manning, 2008) serve as the point of departure for our ‘universal’ dependency representation, together with the tag set of Petrov et al. (2012) as the underlying part-of-speech representation....
[...]
1,011 citations
"Universal Dependency Annotation for..." refers background in this paper
...We report both unlabeled attachment score (UAS) and labeled attachment score (LAS) (Buchholz and Marsi, 2006)....
[...]
...In particular, the CoNLL shared tasks on dependency parsing have provided over twenty data sets in a standardized format (Buchholz and Marsi, 2006; Nivre et al., 2007)....
[...]
...In particular, previous studies could not even report LAS due to differences in treebank annotations....
[...]
938 citations