scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDOI

Use of Bone Densitometry in the Clinical Management of Osteoporosis

John A. Shepherd, +2 more
- pp 105-119
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Methods of measuring bone mineral density are pertinent to the assessment of osteopenia, identification of those individuals at risk of fracture, and identification of candidates for prevention or treatment strategies.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is sometimes termed the “silent epidemic”ause early osteoporosis is asymptomatic, and significant bone loss may become evident only after a hip or vertebral fracture has occurred. Fractures, especially of the spine, hip, and wrist, are the clinical complications of osteoporosis. Initially, spine fractures tend to be asymptomatic but they are associated with significant morbidity as the severity and number of fractures increase. The most serious fractures are those of the hip, which contribute substantially to morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Within a year of a hip fracture the mortality rate is as high as 20% with reduced functional capacity in 50% of surviving patients (1). Even the presence of clinical risk factors such as lifestyle, diet and family history of osteoporosis are relatively insensitive in predicting the presence of osteopenia (2). The pathophysiology of osteoporosis is multifactorial and complex. Fractures, the clinical manifestations of osteoporosis, depend on a variety of factors including the propensity to fall, visual acuity, response to falling, and bone strength (3,4). However, bone mass is the most important determinant of bone strength and accounts for up to 80% of its variance (5,6). Thus reduced bone mass should be a useful predictor of increased fracture risk (7). In fact, many prospective studies of older subjects have shown that levels of bone density at the spine or hip that are one standard deviation below the population mean increases the risk by a factor of two to three (8–11). Methods of measuring bone mineral density are pertinent to the assessment of osteopenia, identification of those individuals at risk of fracture, and identification of candidates for prevention or treatment strategies.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

DXA-Generated Z-Scores and T-Scores May Differ Substantially and Significantly in Young Adults

TL;DR: DXA Z-scores should be interpreted with caution in men and women aged 20-50 yr, and there is no single standard Z-score definition, resulting in different methods of calculation across, and even within, DXA manufacturers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biomechanical comparison of tibial nail stability in a proximal third fracture: Do screw quantity and locked, interlocking screws make a difference?

TL;DR: In this study, proximal segment stability was improved with a greater quantity of screws and with locked interlocking screws, and bone mineral density correlated positively and significantly with fatigue life across all three groups.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry diagnostic discordance between Z-scores and T-scores in young adults.

TL;DR: Diagnostic criteria for postmenopausal osteoporosis using central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores have been widely accepted but the validity of these criteria for other populations, including premenopausal women and young men, has not been established.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures

TL;DR: Measurements of bone mineral density can predict fracture risk but cannot identify individuals who will have a fracture, and a programme of screening menopausal women for osteoporosis by measuring bone density cannot be recommended.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures

TL;DR: In this article, the femoral neck bone density was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry is a better predictor of hip fracture than measurements of other bones, including the radius or calcaneus.
Journal ArticleDOI

Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques

TL;DR: This work recommends three (or four) repeated measurements per individual in a subject group of at least 14 individuals to characterize short-term (or long-term) precision of a technique.
Journal ArticleDOI

Population-Based Study of Survival after Osteoporotic Fractures

TL;DR: The survival rate of 335 residents of Rochester, Minnesota, who had an initial radiologic diagnosis of vertebral fracture between 1985 and 1989 was worse than expected, and diverged steadily from expected values throughout the course of the study.