scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Using the inventory of problems – 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This study supports the use of the IOP-29 together with the TOMM in multimethod symptom validity assessments and provides initial evidence that both tests can be used also in Portugal.
Abstract
This study tested whether combining the Inventory of Problems - 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) would increase sensitivity in the detection of experimentally feigned mental health problems, compared to using either test alone. Additionally, it also evaluated (a) the effects of administration order of these two tests and (b) the cultural and linguistic applicability of these tests to a European Portuguese population. The IOP-29 and TOMM were administered to a community sample of 100 nonclinical, adult volunteers from Portugal, with the instruction to feign mental health problems. Half were instructed to feign mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) symptoms, half were instructed to feign major depression. Administration order had no effects on the tests' scores, and both measures produced excellent sensitivity values, ranging from .82 to .98 for the TOMM, and from .88 to 1.00 for the IOP-29, when using standard a priori cutoff scores. More importantly, combining the results of TOMM with those of IOP-29 notably increased sensitivity compared to using either test alone. This study thus supports the use of the IOP-29 together with the TOMM in multimethod symptom validity assessments and provides initial evidence that both tests can be used also in Portugal.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised.

TL;DR: The newly introduced FCR trial has the potential to enhance the existing arsenal of EVIs within the HVLT-R but must demonstrate its ability to differentiate genuine impairment from non-credible responding before it can be recommended for clinical use.
Journal ArticleDOI

SVT Meets PVT: Development and Initial Validation of the Inventory of Problems – Memory (IOP-M)

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented the development and initial validation of a PVT module designed to be used in combination with a free-standing SVT Named Inventory of Problems -Memory (IOP-M), which consists of a 34-item, two-alternative, forced-choice, implicit recognition test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Indicators to distinguish symptom accentuators from symptom producers in individuals with a diagnosed adjustment disorder: A pilot study on inconsistency subtypes using SIMS and MMPI-2-RF.

TL;DR: The results indicated that the SIMS Total Score, Neurologic Impairment and Low Intelligence scales and the MMPI-2-RF Infrequent Responses and Response Bias scales successfully discriminated among symptom accentuators, symptom producers, and consistent participants.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

TL;DR: This transmutability of the validation matrix argues for the comparisons within the heteromethod block as the most generally relevant validation data, and illustrates the potential interchangeability of trait and method components.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population.

TL;DR: Examining antisocial dispositions in 487 university students revealed that the strongest predictors of antisocial action were disinhibition, primary psychopathy, secondary Psychopathy, and sex, whereas thrill and adventure seeking was a negative predictor.
Journal ArticleDOI

Translating Tests: Some Practical Guidelines

TL;DR: In this paper, three types of bias are identified for cross-cultural cross-lingual psychological instrument translation: bias, bias bias, and bias-based bias in psychological instruments.
Journal ArticleDOI

Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration.

TL;DR: Base rates of probable malingering and symptom exaggeration are reported from a survey of the American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology membership, and diagnosis was supported by multiple sources of evidence, including severity and pattern.
Journal ArticleDOI

American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.

TL;DR: This consensus statement documents the current state of knowledge and recommendations of expert clinical neuropsychologists and is intended to assist clinicians and researchers with regard to the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
Related Papers (5)