Utility Maximization in LTE-Advanced Systems with Carrier Aggregation
Citations
170 citations
Cites background or methods from "Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..."
...As pointed out earlier, a challenge for UG-PF scheme is how to obtain a good trade-off between throughput and fairness....
[...]
...Basic Round Robin (RR) [40], [43], [44], [45] - is used as the reference scheme - simple But with no consideration of different channel characteristics and CA capability Proportional Fair (PF) [4], [27], [36] - is utilized as the basic scheme to be extended in the literature - supports tradeoff between the system throughput and fairness - But has no consideration of different CA capability of terminals and does not exhibit good delay performance To improve fairness between UEs of different channel conditions User grouping PF (UG-PF) [52] - allows for user grouping based on the number of CCs which the users can be scheduled on from their locations - introduces a weighting factor so that the user group in cell-edge can have the advantage to access RBs in the CCs of lower frequencies - How to attain a good trade-off between fairness and throughput remains a challenge To improve fairness between UEs of different CA capability Cross-CC PF [27], [36] - by taking the past user throughput information over all aggregated CCs, makes the scheduling metric of CA-capable UEs smaller - achieves better fairness and coverage performance with no degradation in average cell throughput - results in optimal CC assignment once the CC assignment is determined - But the need for exchange of the user past throughput over each CC, remains an issue To improve fairness between UEs of different channels & CA capability Cross-CC Generalized PF (G-PF) [42] - introduces two tunable parameters into Cross-CC PF scheme - α: to adjust the fairness between UEs with different CA capability - β: to adjust the fairness among users with different average throughput - How to set two parameters adaptively remains a challenge To reduce delay M-LWDF [5] - introduces factors associated with packet loss ratio and delay, into PF scheme To improve delay fairness Packet Fragmentation approach [29] - achieves delay fairness among user groups of UG-PF scheme - supports buffering of the arriving packets into the queues of the group and then partitions the packets over several fragments and distributes on multiple CCs - shows better performances in terms of the delay in each group...
[...]
...CC selection followed by RB assignment on each CC [22], [32], [36], [42]....
[...]
...It is proven [42] that Cross-CC PF is the optimal scheduling scheme for a given CC selection scheme....
[...]
...The UG-PF scheduling can be described in Eq....
[...]
86 citations
Cites background from "Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..."
...To achieve the peak data rate required by IMT-Advanced, Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) under the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) specifies that user equipments (UEs) support bandwidth up to 100 MHz....
[...]
...IN recent years, the number of users using intelligenthand-held equipments increases significantly due to rapid development of information and communication technologies and novel applications....
[...]
64 citations
Cites methods from "Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..."
...As studied in [27, 28], the solution to this imbalance is to use a modified form of PF when calculating the scheduling metric....
[...]
...By applying this modification, it was shown in [27, 28] that the underlying utility function P i log (Ri) is maximized also for the cases where some users are served only by one cell, while other users are served by multiple cells using CA functionality, resulting in more fair resource sharing among the users....
[...]
33 citations
Cites background or methods from "Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..."
...The assumption is also made that the utility is defined as a function of time [27]....
[...]
...The assumption is made that the utility of a user can be defined as a function of throughput and that throughput is defined by information capacity of a given user [27]....
[...]
...10) represents the scheduling condition [27], where r(k, n,m, t) is the expected throughput for a user k on the n component carrier, the m PRB, at time t, and R(k, t) is the average throughput for user k at time t....
[...]
...8) [27], where U(t) is the total network utility as a function of time, t....
[...]
...In this method, maximizing the utility is approximated to maximizing the increase in utility based on user resource allocation [27]....
[...]
32 citations
Cites background from "Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..."
...It becomes the key issue for the resource management in a muti-CC system that how to assign the CCs to each user according to its carrier capability, as well as how to multiplex multiple users in each CC. Recently, there have been a few studies on resource allocation with CA [4][5][6][7][8]....
[...]
References
3,067 citations
1,589 citations
"Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..." refers background or methods in this paper
...1) Independent PF Scheduling: With the independent PF scheduler the resource is assigned to the user that maximizes the following scheduling metric [9]:...
[...]
...On the n CC at time t + 1, R(k, n, t) is updated according to the following equation [9]:...
[...]
...100 slots in [12], 1000 slots in [9])....
[...]
481 citations
"Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..." refers background in this paper
...According to [10], [13], the problem of maxi-...
[...]
...It is shown in [10] that with sufficient large value of t, R(k, n, t) weakly converges to a constant value for a certain user k....
[...]
...The value of T should be chosen to offer a good estimation of the average throughput, with the ability to track changes in the channel characteristics [10] (e....
[...]
446 citations
"Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..." refers background in this paper
...Therefore, several Component Carrier (CC)s need to be aggregated, leading to carrier aggregation [3]....
[...]
398 citations
"Utility Maximization in LTE-Advance..." refers background in this paper
...Apart from using several techniques to improve the spectral efficiency, e.g., Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) transmission, LTE-Advanced requires a much wider bandwidth than current Third Generation systems, up to 100 MHz [2]....
[...]
..., Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) transmission, LTE-Advanced requires a much wider bandwidth than current Third Generation systems, up to 100 MHz [2]....
[...]