Validity and Reliability of Tools to Measure Muscle Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review
01 Mar 2013-Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (Elsevier)-Vol. 14, Iss: 3, pp 170-178
TL;DR: It can be concluded that several tools are available for valid and reliable measurements of muscle mass, strength, and performance in clinical settings and the combination of selected instruments and its use for the screening and identification of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older people need further evaluation.
About: This article is published in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.The article was published on 2013-03-01. It has received 353 citations till now.
Citations
More filters
Istanbul University1, Heidelberg University2, University of Liège3, Karolinska University Hospital4, University of Southampton5, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart6, University of Toulouse7, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust8, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg9, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague10, University of Antwerp11, Public Health Research Institute12, University of Verona13
TL;DR: An emphasis is placed on low muscle strength as a key characteristic of sarcopenia, uses detection of low muscle quantity and quality to confirm the sarc Openia diagnosis, and provides clear cut-off points for measurements of variables that identify and characterise sarc openia.
Abstract: Background in 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) published a sarcopenia definition that aimed to foster advances in identifying and caring for people with sarcopenia. In early 2018, the Working Group met again (EWGSOP2) to update the original definition in order to reflect scientific and clinical evidence that has built over the last decade. This paper presents our updated findings. Objectives to increase consistency of research design, clinical diagnoses and ultimately, care for people with sarcopenia. Recommendations sarcopenia is a muscle disease (muscle failure) rooted in adverse muscle changes that accrue across a lifetime; sarcopenia is common among adults of older age but can also occur earlier in life. In this updated consensus paper on sarcopenia, EWGSOP2: (1) focuses on low muscle strength as a key characteristic of sarcopenia, uses detection of low muscle quantity and quality to confirm the sarcopenia diagnosis, and identifies poor physical performance as indicative of severe sarcopenia; (2) updates the clinical algorithm that can be used for sarcopenia case-finding, diagnosis and confirmation, and severity determination and (3) provides clear cut-off points for measurements of variables that identify and characterise sarcopenia. Conclusions EWGSOP2's updated recommendations aim to increase awareness of sarcopenia and its risk. With these new recommendations, EWGSOP2 calls for healthcare professionals who treat patients at risk for sarcopenia to take actions that will promote early detection and treatment. We also encourage more research in the field of sarcopenia in order to prevent or delay adverse health outcomes that incur a heavy burden for patients and healthcare systems.
6,250 citations
Cites background from "Validity and Reliability of Tools t..."
...A wide variety of tests and tools are now available for characterisation of sarcopenia in practice and in research (Table 2) [38, 39]....
[...]
Taipei Veterans General Hospital1, The Chinese University of Hong Kong2, Mahidol University3, University of Malaya4, South Korean Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs5, Ajou University6, Khon Kaen University7, Kyung Hee University8, National Cheng Kung University9, Chinese Ministry of Health10, Kyoto University11, University of Tokyo12
TL;DR: The AWGS consensus report is believed to promote more Asian sarcopenia research, and most important of all, to focus on sarc Openia intervention studies and the implementation of sarcopenian in clinical practice to improve health care outcomes of older people in the communities and the healthcare settings in Asia.
2,976 citations
[...]
TL;DR: It is suggested here that there is no single formal strategy that must be used in order to achieve sustainability, and a range of built work for sustainable qualities is investigated.
Abstract: Are designed landscapes conceived as geometric compositions or abstractions of nature incompatible with sustainable design? Does mimesis result in the only truly sustainable form in the landscape? This paper attempts to answer these questions by drawing on the observations of practitioners and educators in the field as well as investigating a range of built work for sustainable qualities. The built work is categorized according to four approaches to form genesis, geometric composition, abstractions of nature, mimesis, and combinations of the three. It is suggested here that there is no single formal strategy that must be used in order to achieve sustainability.
600 citations
University of Liège1, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart2, University of Toulouse3, Tufts University4, VU University Amsterdam5, VU University Medical Center6, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg7, National Research Council8, University of Southampton9, King Saud University10, University of Oldenburg11, Vrije Universiteit Brussel12, University of Florence13, University of Oxford14, University of Sheffield15, Arthritis Research UK16, Ghent University Hospital17, Geneva College18, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust19, Australian Catholic University20
TL;DR: The aim of this study was to review the methods to assess muscle mass and to reach consensus on the development of a reference standard for measuring lean body mass.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: All proposed definitions of sarcopenia include the measurement of muscle mass, but the techniques and threshold values used vary. Indeed, the literature does not establish consensus on the best technique for measuring lean body mass. Thus, the objective measurement of sarcopenia is hampered by limitations intrinsic to assessment tools. The aim of this study was to review the methods to assess muscle mass and to reach consensus on the development of a reference standard. METHODS: Literature reviews were performed by members of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis working group on frailty and sarcopenia. Face-to-face meetings were organized for the whole group to make amendments and discuss further recommendations. RESULTS: A wide range of techniques can be used to assess muscle mass. Cost, availability, and ease of use can determine whether the techniques are better suited to clinical practice or are more useful for research. No one technique subserves all requirements but dual energy X-ray absorptiometry could be considered as a reference standard (but not a gold standard) for measuring muscle lean body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the feasibility, accuracy, safety, and low cost, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry can be considered as the reference standard for measuring muscle mass.
434 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) developed a practical clinical definition and consensus diagnostic criteria for age-related sarcopenia as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) developed a practical clinical definition and consensus diagnostic criteria for age-related sarcopenia. EWGSOP included representatives from four participant organisations, i.e. the European Geriatric Medicine Society, the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics-European Region and the International Association of Nutrition and Aging. These organisations endorsed the findings in the final document. The group met and addressed the following questions, using the medical literature to build evidence-based answers: (i) What is sarcopenia? (ii) What parameters define sarcopenia? (iii) What variables reflect these parameters, and what measurement tools and cut-off points can be used? (iv) How does sarcopenia relate to cachexia, frailty and sarcopenic obesity? For the diagnosis of sarcopenia, EWGSOP recommends using the presence of both low muscle mass + low muscle function (strength or performance). EWGSOP variously applies these characteristics to further define conceptual stages as 'presarcopenia', 'sarcopenia' and 'severe sarcopenia'. EWGSOP reviewed a wide range of tools that can be used to measure the specific variables of muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance. Our paper summarises currently available data defining sarcopenia cut-off points by age and gender; suggests an algorithm for sarcopenia case finding in older individuals based on measurements of gait speed, grip strength and muscle mass; and presents a list of suggested primary and secondary outcome domains for research. Once an operational definition of sarcopenia is adopted and included in the mainstream of comprehensive geriatric assessment, the next steps are to define the natural course of sarcopenia and to develop and define effective treatment.
8,440 citations
TL;DR: The criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies.
7,439 citations
TL;DR: The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes.
Abstract: Aim of the COSMIN study (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments) was to develop a consensus-based checklist to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. We present the COSMIN checklist and the agreement of the panel on the items of the checklist. A four-round Delphi study was performed with international experts (psychologists, epidemiologists, statisticians and clinicians). Of the 91 invited experts, 57 agreed to participate (63%). Panel members were asked to rate their (dis)agreement with each proposal on a five-point scale. Consensus was considered to be reached when at least 67% of the panel members indicated ‘agree’ or ‘strongly agree’. Consensus was reached on the inclusion of the following measurement properties: internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, content validity (including face validity), construct validity (including structural validity, hypotheses testing and cross-cultural validity), criterion validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. The latter was not considered a measurement property. The panel also reached consensus on how these properties should be assessed. The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes.
2,772 citations
TL;DR: Performance tests of lower extremity function accurately predict disability across diverse populations and Equations derived from models using both the summary score and the gait speed alone allow for the estimation of risk of disability in community-dwelling populations and provide valuable information for estimating sample size for clinical trials of disability prevention.
Abstract: Background. Although it has been demonstrated that physical performance measures predict incident disability in previously nondisabled older persons, the available data have not been fully developed to create usable methods for determining risk profiles in community-dwelling populations. Using several populations and different follow-up periods, this study replicates previous findings by using the Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly (EPESE) performance battery and provides equations for the prediction of disability risk according to age, sex, and level of performance. Methods. Tests of balance, time to walk 8 ft, and time to rise from a chair 5 times were administered to 4,588 initially nondisabled persons in the four sites of the EPESE and to 1,946 initially nondisabled persons in the Hispanic EPESE. Follow-up assessment for activity of daily living (ADL) and mobility-related disability occurred from 1 to 6 years later. Results. In the EPESE, compared with those with the best performance (EPESE summary performance score of 10‐ 12), the relative risks of mobility-related disability for those with scores of 4‐6 ranged from 2.9 to 4.9 and the relative risk of disability for those with scores of 7‐9 ranged from 1.5 to 2.1, with similar consistent results for ADL disability. The observed rates of incident disability according to performance level in the Hispanic EPESE agreed closely with rates predicted from models developed from the EPESE sites. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that gait speed alone performed almost as well as the full battery in predicting incident disability. Conclusions. Performance tests of lower extremity function accurately predict disability across diverse populations. Equations derived from models using both the summary score and the gait speed alone allow for the estimation of risk of disability in community-dwelling populations and provide valuable information for estimating sample size for clinical trials of disability prevention.
2,513 citations
United States Department of Agriculture1, French Institute of Health and Medical Research2, Research Triangle Park3, Boston University4, Saint Louis University5, University of Pittsburgh6, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg7, Nestlé8, Uppsala University9, Merck & Co.10, Sapienza University of Rome11, National Institutes of Health12, Novartis13, University of Verona14
TL;DR: Sarcopenia should be considered in all older patients who present with observed declines in physical function, strength, or overall health, and patients who meet these criteria should further undergo body composition assessment using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry with sarcopenia being defined using currently validated definitions.
2,378 citations