Viability and resilience of small-scale fisheries through cooperative arrangements
read more
Citations
A Survey of Applications of Viability Theory to the Sustainable Exploitation of Renewable Resources
From Resistance to Transformation: A Generic Metric of Resilience Through Viability
Ecoviability for ecosystem-based fisheries management
Eat Your Fish and Sell It, Too – Livelihood Choices of Small-Scale Fishers in Rural Cambodia
Pallet Picking Strategy in Food Collecting Center
References
A clear human footprint in the coral reefs of the Caribbean
Coastal fisheries in the pacific islands
The Interplay of Well-being and Resilience in Applying a Social-Ecological Perspective
Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity
Understanding Self-Help/Mutual-Aid: Experiential Learning in the Commons
Related Papers (5)
Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty
Frequently Asked Questions (13)
Q2. What future works have the authors mentioned in the paper "Viability and resilience of small-scale fisheries through cooperative arrangements" ?
The lessons from the present analysis confirm, however, the importance of the wantok in maintaining the current socio-ecological viability of the whole system, and suggest that this importance may increase in the future as the pressure on the resource continues to increase.
Q3. What is the effect of the slowed down subsistence and cash income indicators?
The slow decrease in both subsistence and cash-income indicators (while the resource level remains constant) is the consequence of the growth in population and the subsequent increase in number of fishers - over the 10 years of the simulation.
Q4. What is the resilience of non-cooperative fishers?
While the resilience index of non-cooperative fishers remain systematically at zero (suggesting that non-cooperative strategies provide the system with no resilience at all), the resilience index of cooperative fishers shows that for a large range of initial biomass the cooperative strategies offer the strong resilience property to the system.
Q5. Why are the fishers from group 1 able to sustain a positive cash-income?
Because they are very efficient fishers from group 1 are able to catch enough fish to feed the whole community and still maintain positive the14aggregated cash-income for the whole community.
Q6. How long does the food security of the whole community last?
The food security of the whole community is at stake for approximately one year during which the households subsistence is just maintained at the threshold level Hlim.
Q7. What is the effect of the shock on the resource-base B(t)?
The combined effect of their fishing pressure on the resource (diagramme (a) black curve) leads the resource-base B(t) to slowly decline, forcing them to fish more intensively, in line with the race for fish described in the Tragedy of the Commons narrative.
Q8. What are the challenges that small-scale fisheries are facing?
Small-scale fisheries are facing increasing challenges induced by the amplitude and the pace of the changes that are taking place in both their economic and ecological ’worlds’.
Q9. What is the resilience index for non-cooperative fishers?
Figure 4 shows the resilience index computed for both non-cooperative (black curve) and cooperative fishers (light blue curve) as a function of the initial biomass B(0) for a 50% shock in the biomass.
Q10. What is the role of the wantok system in promoting cash viability?
The resilience analysis shows that this household subsistence condition can be satisfied at all time even in the case of severe shocks- provided that the resource-base started above a critical biomass level B♯.Cooperation is better for cash viability Although no specific condition was imposed in the bio-economic model on this dimension, the simulations indicate that the cash income generated by fishers operating under the wantok system is always superior or equal to the cash income derived under non-cooperation, at any time.
Q11. How did the wantok system recover from the shock?
This ability to preserve a critical function of the system was achieved by a change in the fishing strategy: fishers from the group 3 and 4 started to fish again for a short period of time,8. Complementary analyses (not shown here) indicate that in the same conditions a resource affected by a similar shock but exempt of any fishing pressure is able to bounce back to its original level.
Q12. What are the lessons from the present analysis?
The lessons from the present analysis confirm, however, the importance of the wantok in maintaining the current socio-ecological viability of the whole system, and suggest that this importance may increase in the future as the pressure on the resource continues to increase.
Q13. What is the main reason why the situation is exacerbated?
In some places, this situation is exacerbated by the rapid demographic transition that characterises the developing world (Sunderlin, 1994; Botsford et al., 1997).