Vibration characteristics of MR cantilever sandwich beams: experimental study
Summary (1 min read)
Introduction
- The stiffness and damping structural characteristics are controlled, demonstrating vibration suppression capabilities of MR fluids as structural elements.
- Permanent magnets were chosen for their versatility to create different magnetic field configurations (homogeneous and non-homogeneous) along the MR beam.
- The main elements of the employed test rig are the structure with the cantilever MR beam and permanent magnets, an impact hammer, an amplifier, a shaker, an oscillator, a laser vibrometer, a data acquisition card and a dynamic signal analyzer.
- Different options were employed to excite the cantilever MR beams: free vibration, impact hammer and shaker.
4.1. Preliminary tests
- In an initial set of tests, the MR beams were studied in the absence of magnetic field and the readings obtained were compared to choose the most reliable excitation way for this specific application.
- The shaker excitation amplitude was set at a sine force peak of 13.35N.
- The effect of the magnetic field direction on the behaviour of the MR beam was also studied.
- One of the arrangements suggests having adjacent magnets in alternating directions compared to the case where the magnetic field is generated in the same direction.
4.2. PET MR beam
- The effect of activating the MR fluid in one specific region of the PET beam was investigated.
- It is obvious that the natural frequency of the beam decreases as the permanent magnet is moved away from the clamped end of the beam.
- All the magnets inside an aluminium housing have the same polarity and therefore they repel each other; as a consequence, the gaps between the magnets are equal.
- Figure 9 illustrates the change in the resonant frequency of the PET beam upon the application of the magnetic field.
- This behaviour might be due to the mass concentration of the iron particles in specific places and the non-homogeneous stiffening of the MR fluid along the beam.
3.3. Aluminium MR beam
- The natural frequency of the aluminium MR beam was measured for a variety of nonhomogeneous magnetic fields.
- Different readings were obtained when these extra magnets were placed either closer to the clamped end or to the free end.
- Finally, the MR cantilever beam was clamped in two different configurations: horizontal and vertical .
- When the magnetic poles were parallel to the wide face of the aluminium MR beam, a magnetic field of 0.23 T was generated resulting in the increase in the natural frequency by 5.9%.
- At the same time, there was an improvement in the damping properties of the MR beam since the vibration level decreased significantly; the vibration amplitude decreased 15.7 dB.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
498 citations
Cites background or methods from "Vibration characteristics of MR can..."
...Since then, research on MR elastomer has progressed to a new level where significant amount activities have been reported, including material empirical modeling [18, 31-40], material development and property testing [2-3, 1012,14-15, 18, 21,41-60], new device design and characterization [61-84], and performance evaluation [85-105] and aimed for applications in aeronautic engineering, mechanical engineering, automobile engineering and civil engineering....
[...]
...Experimental verifications of such design have been conducted by Lara-Prieto et al [101] and Hu et al[128], figure 32 (b)....
[...]
...Creative designs of devices incorporating MR elastomer have been reported for vibration absorbers [62-71], vibration isolators [16,72,88-89], adaptive base isolators [20,78-79,93], vibration mount [76] and sandwich beam [82-84, 95-103], aimed for various applications, i....
[...]
417 citations
244 citations
80 citations
Cites result from "Vibration characteristics of MR can..."
...This behaviour agrees with the experimental results carried out by Lara-Prieto and his coworkers [23], where the first natural frequency of a cantilever PET MR beam decreased when the magnet moved towards the free end....
[...]
77 citations
References
574 citations
"Vibration characteristics of MR can..." refers background in this paper
...While ER fluids achieve a yield stress between 2-5 kPa, MR fluids achieve 50-100 kPa [12]....
[...]
167 citations
Additional excerpts
...The vibration characteristics of ER and MR fluid simply supported sandwich beams were experimentally investigated [15-16]....
[...]
159 citations
Additional excerpts
...The achieved magnetic fields are stronger than those reported in literature [16]....
[...]
...The vibration characteristics of ER and MR fluid simply supported sandwich beams were experimentally investigated [15-16]....
[...]
114 citations
91 citations
"Vibration characteristics of MR can..." refers background in this paper
...The damping characteristics of ER fluid-filled cantilevered beams in free oscillation were theoretically and/or experimentally investigated by several researchers [2-6]....
[...]
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What contributions have the authors mentioned in the paper "Vibration characteristics of mr cantilever sandwich beams: experimental study" ?
This experimental study investigates controllability of vibration characteristics of magnetorheological cantilever sandwich beams.
Q3. How many magnets were added to the arrangement used for 0.14 T?
In order to generate the magnetic field of 0.24 T, eight Supermagnete Q252513N magnets were added to the arrangement used for 0.14 T.
Q4. What is the effect of a stiffening of the fluid in the regions?
Stiffening the fluid in the regions away from the clamps of the beam, results in a decrease in the natural frequency of the beam compared with the natural frequency in the absence of field.
Q5. What is the effect of the magnetic field on the resonant frequency of the PET beam?
It can be observed that for stronger magnetic fields, the resonant natural frequencies are shifted to lower frequencies with smaller vibration levels.
Q6. How was the magnetic field of the aluminium beam tuned?
With a magnetic field of 0.24 T closer to the free end, the aluminium beam was tunable by 17.5% of the initial natural frequency.
Q7. What was the effect of the magnetic field on the aluminium beam?
Because the distance between the magnetic poles was the same, a stronger magnetic field was achieved on the sides of the aluminium beam (0.32 T), resulting in the increase of 15.9% for the first natural frequency.
Q8. How was the natural frequency of the beam increased?
When the magnetic poles were parallel to the wide face of the aluminium MR beam, a magnetic field of 0.23 T was generated resulting in the increase in the natural frequency by 5.9%.
Q9. What is the effect of partial activation of the MR beam?
In some cases, the partial activation of the MR beam results in smaller vibration amplitudes than when the beam is fully activated.
Q10. How was the natural frequency of the magnetic field tunable?
For a constant magnetic field magnitude, the natural frequency was tunable by 5.0% in the case of the magnetic field with alternating directions compared to the 8.1% for the same direction arrangement.
Q11. How many magnets were attached to the aluminium housing?
Four magnets were placed on top of each aluminium housing and were attached by magnetic forces to the magnets inside the housing (figure 11).
Q12. What is the effect of the magnetic field on the beam?
It is important to consider these arrangements when working with permanent magnets, since adjacent magnetic fields with opposite directions cancel themselves in their boundaries resulting in a lower overall intensity along the beam.
Q13. What configuration was used to study the effect of the magnetic field on the MR beam?
In that configuration, the effect of two different locations of the magnetic poles was studied: parallel and perpendicular to the wide face of the MR beam.
Q14. What arrangement is the reliable for the MR beam?
One of the arrangements suggests having adjacent magnets in alternating directions compared to the case where the magnetic field is generated in the same direction.
Q15. Why is the PET beam shifted to lower frequencies with smaller vibration levels?
This behaviour might be due to the mass concentration of the iron particles in specific places and the non-homogeneous stiffening of the MR fluid along the beam.
Q16. What was the effect of the natural frequency of the aluminium beam on the vibration amplitude?
the natural frequency of the aluminium beam was tuned to achieve variations of 17.5% and the vibration amplitude was decreased by as much as 15.7 dB.