scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Vibration studies of the Stanford Linear Accelerator

01 May 1995-Vol. 1, pp 665-667
TL;DR: In this paper, the linear accelerator structures in the SLC linac show a 1 micron RMS vertical motion with cooling water on and 60 nanometer motion with it off.
Abstract: Vibration measurements of the linear accelerator structures in the SLC linac show a 1 micron RMS vertical motion. This motion reduces to 0.2 micron RMS motion when the cooling water to the accelerator structures is turned off. The quadrupoles have 250 nanometer RMS vertical motion with the accelerator structure cooling water on and 60 nanometer motion with it off. These results together with measurements of the correlations as a function of frequency between the motions of various components are presented.

Summary (1 min read)

Introduction

  • During the 1994/95 colliding beam run of the SLC, the measured jitter in the vertical beam position indicated it had a significant impact on the luminosity [1].
  • Diagnosing the sources of jitter became a priority issue.
  • The possibility of vertical movement of quadrupole magnets or even accelerator structures affecting the beam was considered, and efforts toward modeling and measuring potential sources [2] of beam jitter in the linac ensued.
  • This paper primarily describes measurements of quadrupole and accelerator structure motion in the linac under various conditions and the conclusions reached.

II. SETUP

  • The system used for most measurements combined Mark L4-C geophones, and a SLAC built integrator and amplifier, with a mobile LabView® data acquisition and analysis system.
  • The geophone is essentially a mass suspended on a spring that induces a signal on a coil which is proportional to velocity of the ground motion for frequencies above the geophone natural frequency (~1 Hz).
  • The combined system as configured for these measurements has good †Supported by D.O.E. contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.
  • Electrical noise in the geophone measurements was determined to be several orders of magnitude below the measurement data.
  • Cross checks of the geophones were made using a Hewlett Packard HP3560A Dynamic Signal Analyzer with a PCB Piezotronics model 393B31 accelerometer and an optical linear encoder (Heidenhain model MT60K) with 50nm resolution.

III. MEASUREMENTS

  • Vertical motion of accelerator structures was measured at 1 micron rms, and thought not to be a problem for SLC beams.
  • Correlation between the motions of two quadrupoles separated by 12 meters was high in the 8-14 Hz range but not elsewhere in the spectrum.
  • The quadrupole motion in the 8-14 Hz range, however, was not reduced dramatically with the water off .
  • Figure 3 shows some examples of the integrated spectrum.
  • To study the difference, the pipe vibration near the pump was measured in sector 14.

IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

  • The largest contributor to quadrupole vertical vibration in the SLC is due to the motion of the accelerator cooling water.
  • Compounding the problem is a ~10 Hz resonant quadrupole support structure.
  • Its effect was reduced by adding wedge supports.
  • Other types of quadrupoles need similar fixes.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

SLAC-PUB-95-6867
Work supported by Department of Energy contract DE–AC03–76SF00515.
VIBRATION STUDIES OF THE
STANFORD LINEAR ACCELERATOR
J. L. Turner, C. Adolphsen, G. B. Bowden, F. J. Decker, S. C. Hartman, S. Matsumoto, G.
Mazaheri, D. McCormick, M. Ross, R. Stege, S. Virostek, M. Woodley
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 USA
ABSTRACT
Vibration measurements of the linear accelerator
structures in the SLC linac show a 1 micron rms
vertical motion. This motion reduces to 0.2 micron rms
motion when the cooling water to the accelerator
structures is turned off. The quadrupoles have 250
nanometer rms vertical motion with the accelerator
structure cooling water on and 60 nanometer motion
with it off. These results together with measurements of
the correlations as a function of frequency between the
motions of various components are presented.
I. INTRODUCTION
During the 1994/95 colliding beam run of the SLC,
the measured jitter in the vertical beam position
indicated it had a significant impact on the luminosity
[1]. Diagnosing the sources of jitter became a priority
issue. The possibility of vertical movement of
quadrupole magnets or even accelerator structures
affecting the beam was considered, and efforts toward
modeling and measuring potential sources [2] of beam
jitter in the linac ensued. This paper primarily describes
measurements of quadrupole and accelerator structure
motion in the linac under various conditions and the
conclusions reached.
II. SETUP
The system used for most measurements combined
Mark L4-C geophones, and a SLAC built integrator and
amplifier, with a mobile LabView
®
data acquisition and
analysis system.
The geophone is essentially a mass suspended on a
spring that induces a signal on a coil which is
proportional to velocity of the ground motion for
frequencies above the geophone natural frequency
(~1 Hz). The signal is integrated, amplified, then
digitized at 4 kilohertz on a quad channel board and
analyzed using LabView
®
on a PC. The combined
system as configured for these measurements has good
Supported by D.O.E. contract DE-AC03-76SF00515.
resolution from 2 to 100 Hz. Electrical noise in the
geophone measurements was determined to be several
orders of magnitude below the measurement data.
Cross checks of the geophones were made using a
Hewlett Packard HP3560A Dynamic Signal Analyzer
with a PCB Piezotronics model 393B31 accelerometer
and an optical linear encoder (Heidenhain model MT60K)
with 50nm resolution. They agreed at the 10% level.
III. MEASUREMENTS
Vertical motion of accelerator structures was
measured at 1 micron rms, and thought not to be a
problem for SLC beams. Quadrupole vertical motion
was about 250 nanometers rms, enough to be a problem
[2]. Correlation between the motions of two quadrupoles
separated by 12 meters was high in the 8-14 Hz range
(see figure 1) but not elsewhere in the spectrum.
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Normalized Cross
Power Correlation
10 100
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 1. Spectrum of normalized cross power
correlation of vertical motion of two quadrupoles.
Turning off water to the quadrupoles themselves had
little affect, but turning off the water to the adjacent
accelerator structures lowered vibration of the
quadrupoles from about 250 nanometers rms to about 60
nanometers rms (see figure 2). Thus most of the
quadrupole motion is due to the vibrations that are
caused by the cooling water. Much of the motion is at
59 Hz (see figure 2 bottom plot) which can be seen in
the jitter of the beam orbits [3]. The 59 Hz motion is
believed to be due to the accelerator water pump impeller
rotating at 59 Hz. The quadrupole motion in the 8-14 Hz

range, however, was not reduced dramatically with the
water off (see figure 2).
10
-9
10
-7
10
-5
10
-3
Power Spectrum (µm
2
/Hz)
10
-1
10 100
Q701 Water On
Frequency (Hz)
Q701 Water Off
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Integrated Spectrum (µm)
0.3
10 100
Frequency (Hz)
Q701 Water On
Q701 Water Off
Figure 2. Quadrupole motion spectrum (top) and
integrated spectrum (bottom) with accelerator cooling
water on and off.
Not all quadrupoles exhibit the same behavior.
Figure 3 shows some examples of the integrated
spectrum. Note that the fraction of 8-14 Hz motion and
59 Hz motion differs. Oscillations at 28-30 Hz dominate
the spectrum of quadrupoles that have upright supports
(the so called matching quadrupoles, see Q901 in figure
3) even with the water off. These quadrupoles also have
a spike at 59 Hz that disappears when the accelerator
water is turned off.
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Integrated Spectrum (µm)
0.3
Q501
Q601
Q801
Q901
Q701
Frequency (Hz)
10 100
Figure 3. Integrated vertical motion of five quadrupoles
with the accelerator water on.
Much of the quadrupole motion is related to the
design of its support. The centroid of the quadrupole is
offset along the beam direction (Z) which allows the
quadrupole to vibrate in an arc in the ZY plane (see
figure 4). Clamping the quadrupoles to the adjacent
structure reduced the 10-14 Hz motion significantly.
Figure 4. Side view of standard quadrupole with arrows
showing direction of movement.
Quadrupoles in different sectors are affected by
different accelerator water circuits. Those sampled in
sector 12 did not show as large a 59 Hz problem as seen
in sectors 14 and 15.
To study the difference, the pipe vibration near the
pump was measured in sector 14. The 59 Hz motion
was observed. Also, a pressure transducer was used to
measure the time variation of the pressure at sector 12
and 14. The pump rotates at 59 Hz, and pump impellers
have five vanes which create a large contribution at 295
Hz. Figure 5 shows the integrated spectra of the pressure
variations.

10
-11
10
-9
10
-7
10
-5
Integrated Spectrum (psi)
10 100
Sector 14
Sector 12
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 5. Integrated water pressure variations from two
accelerator water systems.
10
-9
10
-7
10
-5
0.001
Power Spectrum (µm
2
/Hz)
10 100
Accelerator Floor
Frequency (Hz)
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
Integrated Spectrum (µm)
10 100
Accelerator Floor
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 6. Spectrum and integral of vertical motion on
the floor of the accelerator tunnel (about 35' below
ground [4]).
Finally, measurements of the accelerator floor
motion were made. Figure 6 shows an example.
Integrated values (>2 Hz) between 9 and 35 nanometers
were observed on different days.
IV. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
The largest contributor to quadrupole vertical
vibration in the SLC is due to the motion of the
accelerator cooling water. Much of this motion is at 59
Hz. The 59 Hz is transmitted from the pump by
modulating the water pressure. Pump impeller quality
may be the cause.
Compounding the problem is a ~10 Hz resonant
quadrupole support structure. Its effect was reduced by
adding wedge supports. Other types of quadrupoles need
similar fixes.
V. REFERENCES
[1] P. Emma, "The Stanford Linear Collider,"
Contribution WAG01, 1995 PAC
[2] C. Adolphsen and T. Slaton, "Beam Trajectory
Jitter in the SLC Linac," Contribution WAB08, 1995
PAC
[3] M. G. Minty et al, "Optimization of Feedback
Performance at the Stanford Linear Collider",
Contribution RPB03,1995 PAC
[4] R. B. Neal, "The Stanford Two-Mile Accel-
erator," W. A. Benjamin, Inc. 1968
Citations
More filters
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: The Compact LInear Collider (CLIC) study at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) is developing the design of a 3 TeV ee linear collider, which will be done by colliding beams with transverse spot sizes in the nanometre range as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: The Compact LInear Collider (CLIC) study at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) is developing the design of a 3 TeV ee linear collider. The discovery reach of this machine depends on obtaining a luminosity of 10 cms, which will be done by colliding beams with transverse spot sizes in the nanometre range (≈ 60 × 0.7 nm). Tolerances on fast mechanical stability of the focusing quadrupoles reach the 0.2 nm level. The serious concern of magnet stabilization for future linear colliders has been addressed by building a CERN test stand on magnet stability, bringing together state-of-the-art stabilization technology, latest equipment for vibration measurements and realistic magnet prototypes. For the first time an accelerator magnet was successfully stabilized to the sub-nanometre level, reducing its vibrations level by one order of magnitude with respect to the supporting ground. The best measurements indicate transverse RMS vibration amplitudes (above 4 Hz) of (0.79±0.08) nm horizontally and (0.43±0.04) nm vertically, maintained to a maximum of less than (1.47±0.15) nm and (1.00±0.10) nm, respectively, over a period of several days. Detailed simulations of time-dependent luminosity, which use a model for magnet displacements based on measured vibration spectra, show that approximately 70% of the CLIC goal luminosity can be achieved with the demonstrated performance in the CERN test stand. This indicates the basic feasibility of colliding nanometre-size beams in CLIC. Geneva, Switzerland 1 June 2004 PhD thesis presented at the University of Lausanne (CH), High Energy Physics Institute (IPHE), in December 2003. Work was carried out at CERN from January 2001 to December 2003, in the framework of the CLIC Stability Study Team.

37 citations


Cites methods from "Vibration studies of the Stanford L..."

  • ...For example, the effect of water induced vibrations was measured at the Stanford Linear Collider [94]....

    [...]

  • ...The large emittance of 2It is perhaps interesting to note that the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC), the sole linear collider built to date, did not actually consist of two opposing machines....

    [...]

  • ...It is worth mentioning that the sole linear collider built so far, is the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) [15]....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
P. Emma1
01 May 1995
TL;DR: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) as mentioned in this paper is the only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world that produces high intensity, submicron sized, polarized beams at a single interaction point.
Abstract: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) is the first and only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world. Its most remarkable features are high intensity, submicron sized, polarized (e/sup -/) beams at a single interaction point. The main challenges posed by these unique characteristics include machine-wide emittance preservation, consistent high intensity operation, polarized electron production and transport, and the achievement of a high degree of beam stability on all time scales. In addition to serving as an important machine for the study of Z/sup 0/ boson production and decay using polarized beams, the SLC is also an indispensable source of hands-on experience for future linear colliders. Each new year of operation has been highlighted with a marked improvement in performance. The most significant improvements for the 1994-95 run include new low impedance vacuum chambers for the damping rings, an upgrade to the optics and diagnostics of the final focus systems, and a higher degree of polarization from the electron source. As a result, the average luminosity has nearly doubled over the previous year with peaks approaching 10/sup 30/ cm/sup -2/ s/sup -1/ and an 80% electron polarization at the interaction point. These developments as well as the remaining identifiable performance limitations will be discussed.

18 citations


Cites methods from "Vibration studies of the Stanford L..."

  • ...Measurements of quadrupole magnet vibrations using a geophone indicate ~300 nm rms vibrations for frequencies above 1 Hz [24]....

    [...]

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 May 1995
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present model-independent measurements of the vertical trajectory jitter of the positron beam in the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) linac and discuss the results of studies aimed at isolating its source.
Abstract: We present model-independent measurements of the vertical trajectory jitter of the positron beam in the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) linac and discuss the results of studies aimed at isolating its source.

10 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 May 1995
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors traced the origin and amplification of the jitter in the SLC to wakefields in the linac, instabilities in the damping rings, acceptance limitations and feedback performance.
Abstract: Although the SLC achieved record luminosity in 1994, a major hindrance to further increases is pulse-to-pulse stability of the machine, often referred to as jitter. Raising the intensity of the SLC beams has gained luminosity but the intensity-normalized luminosity has decreased due to additional emittance dilution and to increasing jitter at higher intensities. Precision tuning of the final focus using beam-beam deflection scans is hampered by the pulse-to-pulse variations in both beam position and beam size. These were traced to position, intensity and energy jitter in various subsystems of the collider. Contributions to both the origin and amplification of the jitter have been identified as coming from wakefields in the linac, instabilities in the damping rings, acceptance limitations and feedback performance. The intensity fluctuations from the source can easily be amplified as a result of the SLC configuration of accelerating the two electron and positron bunches in the same linac.

9 citations

DOI
01 Aug 1996
TL;DR: In this paper, a search for possible sources of jitter within the SLC linac uncovered some problems such as structure jitter at 8 to 12 Hz, pump vibrations at 59 Hz and 1 Hz aliasing by the feedback systems.
Abstract: The pulse-to-pulse behavior of the beams in the SLC linac is dominated by wakefields which can amplify any other sources of jitter. A strong focusing lattice combined with BNS damping controls the amplitude of oscillations which otherwise would grow exponentially. Measurements of oscillation amplitude along the linac show beam motion that is up to six times larger than that expected from injection jitter. A search for possible sources of jitter within the linac uncovered some problems such as structure jitter at 8 to 12 Hz, pump vibrations at 59 Hz and 1 Hz aliasing by the feedback systems. These account for only a small fraction of the observed jitter which is dominantly white noise. No source has yet been fully identified but possible candidates are dark current in the linac structures (not confirmed by experiment) or subtle correlations in injection jitter. An example would be a correlated x-z jitter with no net offset visible on the beam position monitors at injection. Such a correlation would cause jitter growth along the linac as wakefields from the head of the bunch deflect the core and tail of the bunch. Estimates of the magnitude of this effect and some possible sources are discussedmore » in this paper.« less

7 citations


Cites background from "Vibration studies of the Stanford L..."

  • ...The jitter still remained big and besides some distinct frequency lines [4], the jitter is coming from a white noise source which grows by a factor of up to six in the linac [5]....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

227 citations


"Vibration studies of the Stanford L..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Figure 6. Spectrum and integral of vertical motion on the floor of the accelerator tunnel (about 35' below ground [ 4 ])....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first Z zero particle was observed at the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) as discussed by the authors, where two linear beams of electrons and positrons are colliding into each other, and the SLC is used to measure the properties of the Z zero.
Abstract: April, 1989, the first Z zero particle was observed at the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC). The SLC collides high-energy beams of electrons and positrons into each other. In break with tradition the SLC aims two linear beams at each other. Strong motives impelled the Stanford team to choose the route of innovation. One reason being that linear colliders promise to be less expensive to build and operate than storage ring colliders. An equally powerful motive was the desire to build an Z zero factory, a facility at which the Z zero particle can be studied in detail. More than 200 Z zero particles have been detected at the SLC and more continue to be churned out regularly. It is in measuring the properties of the Z zero that the SLC has a seminal contribution to make. One of the primary goals of the SLC experimental program is to determine the mass of the Z zero as precisely as possible.In the end, the SLC's greatest significance will be in having proved a new accelerator technology. 7 figs.

25 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
P. Emma1
01 May 1995
TL;DR: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) as mentioned in this paper is the only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world that produces high intensity, submicron sized, polarized beams at a single interaction point.
Abstract: The Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) is the first and only high-energy e/sup +/e/sup -/ linear collider in the world. Its most remarkable features are high intensity, submicron sized, polarized (e/sup -/) beams at a single interaction point. The main challenges posed by these unique characteristics include machine-wide emittance preservation, consistent high intensity operation, polarized electron production and transport, and the achievement of a high degree of beam stability on all time scales. In addition to serving as an important machine for the study of Z/sup 0/ boson production and decay using polarized beams, the SLC is also an indispensable source of hands-on experience for future linear colliders. Each new year of operation has been highlighted with a marked improvement in performance. The most significant improvements for the 1994-95 run include new low impedance vacuum chambers for the damping rings, an upgrade to the optics and diagnostics of the final focus systems, and a higher degree of polarization from the electron source. As a result, the average luminosity has nearly doubled over the previous year with peaks approaching 10/sup 30/ cm/sup -2/ s/sup -1/ and an 80% electron polarization at the interaction point. These developments as well as the remaining identifiable performance limitations will be discussed.

18 citations

Proceedings ArticleDOI
01 May 1995
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present model-independent measurements of the vertical trajectory jitter of the positron beam in the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) linac and discuss the results of studies aimed at isolating its source.
Abstract: We present model-independent measurements of the vertical trajectory jitter of the positron beam in the Stanford Linear Collider (SLC) linac and discuss the results of studies aimed at isolating its source.

10 citations


"Vibration studies of the Stanford L..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Quadrupole vertical motion was about 250 nanometers rms, enough to be a problem [2]....

    [...]

  • ...The possibility of vertical movement of quadrupole magnets or even accelerator structures affecting the beam was considered, and efforts toward modeling and measuring potential sources [2] of beam jitter in the linac ensued....

    [...]

Frequently Asked Questions (3)
Q1. What are the contributions in this paper?

In this paper, the authors show that the largest contributor to quadrupole vertical vibration in the SLC is due to the motion of the accelerator cooling water. 

The geophone is essentially a mass suspended on a spring that induces a signal on a coil which is proportional to velocity of the ground motion for frequencies above the geophone natural frequency (~1 Hz). 

Turning off water to the quadrupoles themselves had little affect, but turning off the water to the adjacent accelerator structures lowered vibration of the quadrupoles from about 250 nanometers rms to about 60 nanometers rms (see figure 2).