Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing African Antelopes
TL;DR: Time spent looking varied with position within the group; this effect was strongest in closed habitats, where central animals tended to scan least and feed most, and within species, animals inclosed habitats, those with dense vegetation, tended to spend more time in looking than did animals in the open.
Abstract: African antelope may devote a large proportion of their foraging time to looking around. The factors affecting such vigilance behaviour are examined for grazing antelope, five species being studied in detail. The proportion of time spent looking decreased as species body weight increased. Within species, animals in closed habitats, those with dense vegetation, tended to spend more time in looking than did animals in the open. There was some evidence that vigilance, presumably for predators, was shared by group members, but in one species, impala, vigilance apparently increased with group size and with proximity to neighbours. Time spent looking varied with position within the group; this effect was strongest in closed habitats, where central animals tended to scan least and feed most. Vigilance increased as feeding success decreased, partly due to mutual interference between looking and feeding. The possible social, foraging and predator-detection values of vigilance are discussed. A simple model is introduced to help explain the effects of cover and to facilitate further discussion.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The grouping pattern and social organization of Siberian ibex were closely correlated to the availability and quality of their food supply and yearly breeding cycle.
Abstract: A study on group size and composition in Siberian ibex (Capra sibirica) was conducted in the Eastern Tien-Shan Mountains. We found that small groups (1-5 individuals) were most common for this species. Generally, mixed-sex groups were larger than male and female groups. Since males have more ability for fiber digestion, because of their larger body size than females, they are less selective in food quality. Due to this, males gathered into larger single-sex groups in August-September, when forage was at its maximal biomass, and into smaller groups when the amount of food was limited (winter-early-spring). During birthing period, pregnant females typically separated from groups to give birth, returning to the female groups in May-June, when high-quality food was at its maximal availability, making female groups largest in this period. Similar to other sexually dimorphic species, Siberian ibex females and males stayed together in mixed-sex groups during rutting season, demonstrating sexual segregation outside of the rutting season, particularly during summer. Nevertheless, there are still a significant number of males and females that stay in mixed-sex groups throughout the year. In conclusion, the grouping pattern and social organization of Siberian ibex were closely correlated to the availability and quality of their food supply and yearly breeding cycle. Accordingly, Siberian ibexes changed their feeding strategy: being mixed feeders they behaved similar to concentrate selectors when food was scant and preferred small sized groups; while they enlarged their group sizes during seasons when the enriching of forage conditions allowed them to do that. However, group enlarging happened in different months depending on group typology (i.e. mixed-sex, male or female groups) depending on the feeding strategy of their individuals.
8 citations
Cites background from "Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing Afri..."
...Animals which stay in foraging groups spend less scanning for risk assessment than do solitary individuals (Lipetz & Bekoff 1982, Underwood 1982, Berger & Cunningham 1988)....
[...]
TL;DR: The relationships between group size, activity patterns, and time of day were studied during a mild winter in a protected population of Isard or Pyrenean chamois in open montane pastures in the bottom of a central valley, bordered by a beech forest.
Abstract: The relationships between group size, activity patterns, and time of day were studied during a mild winter in a protected population of Isard or Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica pyrenaica) in open montane pastures in the bottom of a central valley, bordered by a beech forest. The size and the total number of groups increased progressively from dawn to the middle of the afternoon. Nearly half of the animals foraged early in the morning, while about two out of five were moving. As the day proceeded, the allocation of time for foraging increased regularly until approximately 3/4 of the animals were observed foraging at about 17:00. Foraging increased initially at the expense of moving, and later to both moving and standing. Then, just before dusk, both group size and time devoted to foraging decreased, as individuals returned to the beech forest to rest during the night in a sheltered habitat. The relative influence of weather conditions and of the digestive physiology of Pyrenean chamois on this spatio...
8 citations
TL;DR: The results demonstrate how foraging experiments—typically the basis for field studies on species coexistence—can be extended to make inferences about consumer-resource dynamics in human-modified landscapes.
8 citations
Cites background from "Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing Afri..."
...A raised head posture is often associated with higher alertness and risk-aversion in ungulates, especially in habitats with low visibility (Makin et al., 2017; Smith and Cain, 2009; Underwood, 1982)....
[...]
TL;DR: It is shown that fruit flies displayed a graded decrease in freezing behavior, triggered by an inescapable threat, with increasing group sizes, and that lobula columnar neurons, LC11, mediate the propensity for freezing flies to resume moving in response to the movement of others.
Abstract: Being in a group can increase the chances of survival upon an encounter with a predator. This safety in numbers effect allows animals to decrease their defenses when in groups. Despite its wide prevalence, the mechanisms by which group size regulates defensive behaviors remains largely unknown. Here we show that fruit flies displayed a graded decrease in freezing behavior, triggered by an inescapable threat, with increasing group sizes. Furthermore, flies used the cessation of movement of other flies as a cue of threat and its resumption as a cue of safety. Finally, we found that lobula columnar neurons, LC11, mediate the propensity for freezing flies to resume moving in response to the movement of others. Taken together our results suggest that flies rely on motion cues of others to infer danger, allowing a decrease in defensive behaviors when in groups. By identifying neurons implicated in this process this study sets the stage for the search of the neuronal basis of safety in numbers.
7 citations
Dissertation•
01 Jan 2012
TL;DR: The behavior of wild Przewalski horses was studied in Hustai National Park, Mongolia as discussed by the authors, where home ranges of harems ranged from 129 ha to 2399 ha, with core areas of between 61 ha and 1196 ha.
Abstract: Studies on the behavioural ecology of Przewalski horses (Equus przewalskiiy recently reintroduced into Hustai National Park, Mongolia were carried out between 1998 and 2000. Home range size and habitat use, social, marking, and vigilance behaviour, and their reaction to flies were quantified. Home ranges of harems ranged from 129 ha to 2399 ha, with core areas of between 61 ha and 1196 ha. There was no relationship between range size and harem size, or length of time since release. The more nutritious vegetation at lower elevations was preferentially selected. The horses rested near ridges during the hotter parts of the day where there were fewer flies, and grazed in the valleys in the mornings and evenings. Woodland areas were used to shelter from the sun, despite their high fly abundance. Muscid flies were most frequently caught; Tabanids were rare. Dominance was related to age, aggression and length of time in the harem. The frequency of associative behaviours did not correlate with any social factor, but had a hygienic function. Stallions marked stud piles wid mare eliminations in different ways suggesting different functions. In addition to being vigilant for predators, the horses appeared to scan for social cues and food patches. Home range size and habitat use, and general pattern of marking and vigilance behaviour, of the wild Przewalski horses were similar to those seen among feral domestic horses, although they tended to be less aggressive than captive and feral horses. So far, the re-establishment of przewalski horses into HNP appears to have been successful, although constant monitoring of the population is necessary. As the population grows, there will be potential problems to do with exceeding the carrying capacity of the park and hybridisation with domestic horses. The future management of the horses is discussed.
7 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: Seven major types of sampling for observational studies of social behavior have been found in the literature and the major strengths and weaknesses of each method are pointed out.
Abstract: Seven major types of sampling for observational studies of social behavior have been found in the literature. These methods differ considerably in their suitability for providing unbiased data of various kinds. Below is a summary of the major recommended uses of each technique: In this paper, I have tried to point out the major strengths and weaknesses of each sampling method. Some methods are intrinsically biased with respect to many variables, others to fewer. In choosing a sampling method the main question is whether the procedure results in a biased sample of the variables under study. A method can produce a biased sample directly, as a result of intrinsic bias with respect to a study variable, or secondarily due to some degree of dependence (correlation) between the study variable and a directly-biased variable. In order to choose a sampling technique, the observer needs to consider carefully the characteristics of behavior and social interactions that are relevant to the study population and the research questions at hand. In most studies one will not have adequate empirical knowledge of the dependencies between relevant variables. Under the circumstances, the observer should avoid intrinsic biases to whatever extent possible, in particular those that direcly affect the variables under study. Finally, it will often be possible to use more than one sampling method in a study. Such samples can be taken successively or, under favorable conditions, even concurrently. For example, we have found it possible to take Instantaneous Samples of the identities and distances of nearest neighbors of a focal individual at five or ten minute intervals during Focal-Animal (behavior) Samples on that individual. Often during Focal-Animal Sampling one can also record All Occurrences of Some Behaviors, for the whole social group, for categories of conspicuous behavior, such as predation, intergroup contact, drinking, and so on. The extent to which concurrent multiple sampling is feasible will depend very much on the behavior categories and rate of occurrence, the observational conditions, etc. Where feasible, such multiple sampling can greatly aid in the efficient use of research time.
12,470 citations
TL;DR: An antithesis to the view that gregarious behaviour is evolved through benefits to the population or species is presented, and simply defined models are used to show that even in non-gregarious species selection is likely to favour individuals who stay close to others.
3,343 citations
Additional excerpts
...The 'selfish herd' (HAMILTON, 1971)...
[...]
TL;DR: The paper describes different feeding styles among antelope, in terms of selection of food items and coverage of home ranges, and argues that these feeding styles bear a relationship to maximum group size of feeding animals through the influence of dispersion ofFood items upon group cohesion.
Abstract: The types of social organisation displayed by the African antelope species have been assigned in this paper to five classes, distinguished largely by the strategies used by the reproductively active males in securing mating rights, and the effects of those strategies on other social castes. The paper attempts to show that these strategies are appropriate to each class because of the effects of other, ecological, aspects of their ways of life. The paper describes different feeding styles among antelope, in terms of selection of food items and coverage of home ranges. It argues that these feeding styles bear a relationship to maximum group size of feeding animals through the influence of dispersion of food items upon group cohesion. The feeding styles also bear a relationship to body size and to habitat choice, both of which influence the antelope species' antipredator behaviour. Thus feeding style is related to anti-predator behaviour which, in many species, influences minimum group size. Group size and the pattern of movement over the annual home range affect the likelihood of females being found in a given place at a given time, and it is this likelihood which, to a large extent, determines the kind of strategy a male must employ to achieve mating rights. The effects of the different strategies employed by males can be seen in such aspects of each species' biology as sexual dimorphism, adult sex ratio, and differential distribution of the sexes.
2,088 citations
"Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing Afri..." refers background in this paper
...Such habitat differences may have influenced the evolution of social and anti-predator behaviour in antelope (GEIST, 1974; JARMAN, 1974; ESTES, 1974) and may also affect both predator and prey behaviour on a day to day basis (SCHALLER, 1972; KRUUK, 1972; CURIO, 1976; EDMUNDS, 1974)....
[...]
...If scanning reduces predation, it may take up less of the large animals' time either because both the number and the range of potential predators are smaller (JARMAN, 1974; GEIST, 1974), or because these antelope, being found in large groups, either are (a) less easy for a predator to find, (b) share vigilance with other group members (CARACAO et al....
[...]
...The smaller and, according to JARMAN (1974), the more selective species are those which show significant correlations between the rate of looking and indices of feeding success, supporting the possibility that scanning forms a part of foraging behaviour....
[...]
1,193 citations
Book•
21 Sep 1976
TL;DR: This chapter discusses hunting for Prey, the Diversity of Hunting Methods, and the Motivation Underlying Feeding Responses of Predator-Prey Interactions.
Abstract: 1 Internal Factors.- A. Hunger: Expression through Overt behavior.- I. Predatory Schedules.- 1. Patterns of Satiation.- 2. Feast and Famine.- II. Hunger and Diel Rhythms.- III. The Ramification of Hunger Effects.- 1. Capture-eliciting Prey Stimuli.- 2. Search behavior.- IV. The Motivation Underlying Feeding Responses.- 1. Hunger Thresholds of Feeding Response Components.- 2. The Complexity of Predatory Motivation.- V. The Diversity of Foraging Tactics.- VI. Feeding Components Affected and not Affected by Hunger.- B. The Control of Feeding Responses by Factors Other than Hunger.- I. The Readiness to Hunt.- II. Prey Storing.- III. Providing Food for Dependent Family Members.- C. The Problem of Specific Hungers.- I. Switching of Prey.- II. The Prey-density Predation Curve.- III. Swamping the Appetite of Predators.- D. Daily and Annual Rhythms in Predator-Prey Interactions.- I. Daily Rhythm of Predation.- II. Daily Activity Patterns of the Prey.- III. Annual Rhythm of Predation.- 2 Searching for Prey.- A. Path of Searching and Scanning Movements.- B. Area-concentrated Search.- I. Short-term Area Concentration.- 1. Living Scattered and Area-concentrated Search.- 2. The Nature of the Path Changes.- 3. Search Behavior after the Disappearance of Prey.- II. Long-term Area Concentration.- III. One-prey : One-place Association.- C. Object-concentrated Search.- I. Existence and Properties of "Searching Image".- 1. Ecological Evidence.- 2. Experimental Evidence.- II. Social Facilitation of Searching Image Formation.- III. Searching Image and "Training Bias".- IV. Searching Image and Profitability of Hunting.- 1. Ecological Evidence for Profitability of Hunting.- 2. Experimental Evidence for Profitability of Hunting.- V. Prey-specific Expectation.- VI. Ecological Implications of Searching Image.- 3 Prey Recognition.- A. The Stimulus-specificity of Prey Capture.- I. Capture-eliciting Prey Stimuli.- II. Capture-inhibiting Prey Stimuli.- B. One-prey : One-response Relationships.- C. The Assessment of the Circumstances of a Hunt.- D. Prey Recognition by Prey-related Signals.- E. Prey Stimulus Summation.- F. Novelty Versus Familiarity.- I. The Rejection of Novel Prey.- II. Familiarization with Prey and Its Consequences.- G. The Multi-channel Hypothesis of Prey Recognition.- 4 Prey Selection.- A. Preying upon the Weak and the Sick.- B. Preying upon the Odd and the Conspicuous.- C. The Mechanics of Prey Selection.- D. Evolutionary Implications.- 5 Hunting for Prey.- A. Modes of Hunting.- I. Hunting by Speculation.- II. Stalking and Ambushing.- 1. Stalking.- 2. Ambushing.- III. Prey Attack under Disguise.- IV. Pursuit of the Prey.- 1. Changes of Velocity of Attack (Pursuit).- 2. Interception of the Flight Path.- 3. Counteradaptations of the Prey.- V. Exhausting Dangerous Prey.- VI. Insinuation.- VII. Scavenging and Cleptoparasitism.- 1. Modes and Extent.- 2. Cleptoparasitism and Competition.- 3. Counter-measures of the Robbed.- VIII. Tool-use.- IX. Mutilation.- B. The Diversity of Hunting Methods.- I. Prey-specific Methods.- II. Situation-specific Methods.- III. Mechanisms and Causes of Predatory Versatility.- 1. General.- 2. Individual Predatory Repertories.- 3. The Persistence of Individual Traits.- 4. Predatory Specialization and Structural Modification.- 5. Predatory Versatility in Relation to Prey Availability.- C. Behavioral Aspects of Hunting Success.- I. A Comparison of Hunting Success across Predator Species.- II. Variables Influencing Hunting Success within Predator Species.- III. Aspects of Communal Hunting.- 1. Modes and Properties of Communal Hunting.- 2. Factors Conducive to Communal Hunting.- 3. Benefits of Communal Hunting.- References.- Scientific Names of Animals and Plants.
919 citations
"Vigilance Behaviour in Grazing Afri..." refers background in this paper
...Such habitat differences may have influenced the evolution of social and anti-predator behaviour in antelope (GEIST, 1974; JARMAN, 1974; ESTES, 1974) and may also affect both predator and prey behaviour on a day to day basis (SCHALLER, 1972; KRUUK, 1972; CURIO, 1976; EDMUNDS, 1974)....
[...]