scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Violence & social order beyond the state: Somalia & Angola

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The authors examined the economic activities of non-state actors in war in Somalia and Angola and argued that prolonged wars are characterised by the emergence of social orders of violence beyond the state.
Abstract
This paper examines the activities of non-state actors in war in Somalia and Angola. Arguing that prolonged wars are characterised by the emergence of social orders of violence beyond the state, our analytical focus is on how actors establish and sustain these orders. A core influence is the insight from research on war economies that war is not equal to the breakdown of societal order, but represents an alternative form of social order. We therefore examine the economic activities of insurgents in regard to their embeddedness in social and political spheres. The central question in this paper is how economic, political and symbolic aspects interact and determine as well as transform social orders of violence. With the examples of Somalia and Angola, two rather distinct cases of non-state orders of violence are examined. It is argued that these orders represent forms of authority with fundamental structural aspects in common. We suggest that these orders can be systematised on a continuum between two pole...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Failures of the state failure debate: Evidence from the Somali territories

TL;DR: In this article, a comparative analysis of politics in the Somali inhabited territories of the Horn of Africa is presented, showing that state formation in Africa contradicts central tenets of the state failure debate and that external state-building interventions should recognise and engage with sub-national political entities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rebel Diplomacy in Civil War

TL;DR: A systematic documentation of rebel diplomacy in post-1950 civil wars using new quantitative and qualitative data shows that rebel diplomacy is commonplace and that many groups demonstrate as much concern for overseas political campaigns as they do for domestic and local mobilization as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Failed States’ and ‘State Failure’: Threats or Opportunities?

TL;DR: The authors argue that the use of the failed state label is inherently political, and based primarily on Western perceptions of Western security and interests, and that states called failed are primarily those in which the recession and informalisation of the state is perceived to be a threat to Western interests; in other states, this feature of state functioning is not only accepted, but also to a certain degree facilitated, as it creates an enabling environment for business and international capital.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Does the Somali Experience Teach Us about the Social Contract and the State

TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the assumptions embedded in the works of the classic Western social contract theorists in the light of the Somali experience in order to show that the underlying conceptual structure of international state reconstruction work needs to be rethought.
Journal ArticleDOI

Mainstreaming the non-state in bottom-up state-building: linkages between rebel governance and post-conflict legitimacy

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the potential for mainstreaming wartime rebel governance structures into post-conflict state-building efforts and highlight three pitfalls of mainstreaming non-state roles without sufficient analysis of the sources of legitimacy underlying rebel governance frameworks.
References
More filters
Posted Content

Greed and Grievance in Civil War

TL;DR: Collier and Hoeffler as discussed by the authors compare two contrasting motivations for rebellion: greed and grievance, and show that many rebellions are linked to the capture of resources (such as diamonds in Angola and Sierra Leone, drugs in Colombia, and timber in Cambodia).
Posted Content

Greed and Grievance in Civil War

TL;DR: In this article, the authors compare two contrasting motivations for rebellion: greed and grievance, and suggest that the only point at which to intervene is to reduce the level of objective grievance.