scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article

Violencia filioparental y su asociación con la exposición a la violencia marital y la agresión de padres a hijos

31 Dec 2012-Psicothema (Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias)-Vol. 24, Iss: 2, pp 277-283
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between the exposure to different types of family violence (intraparental violence and parent-to-child aggression) and the perpetration of childto-parent violence (CPV) and analyzed sex differences in the relationships specifi ed.
Abstract: Los objetivos de este estudio fueron: a) analizar la relacion entre la exposicion a diferentes tipos de violencia en la familia (agresion entre los padres y agresion de padres a hijos) y la perpetracion de conductas de violencia fi lioparental (VFP); b) examinar las posibles diferencias en funcion del sexo de los hijos en las relaciones especifi cadas. Para ello, se empleo una muestra de 1.681 universitarios (74,7% mujeres) que informaron sobre su exposicion a diferentes experiencias de violencia intrafamiliar durante su infancia. Cada tipo de violencia, psicologica y fisica, fue analizada por separado. Los resultados mostraron que tanto la exposicion a la agresion psicologica entre los padres como la agresion psicologica de padres a hijos se asociaron con una mayor frecuencia de VFP psicologica. Por otra parte, la agresion psicologica y fisica de padres a hijos, asi como la exposicion a la agresion fisica entre los padres se relacionaron con una mayor VFP fisica. No se encontraron diferencias por sexos en las relaciones entre las variables, lo cual sugiere que la relacion entre la exposicion a la violencia intrafamiliar y la VFP es similar para varones y mujeres. Child-to-parent violence and its association with exposure to marital violence and parent-to-child violence. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine the relationships between the exposure to different types of family violence (intraparental violence and parent-to-child aggression) and the perpetration of child-to-parent violence (CPV); (b) to analyze sex differences in the relationships specifi ed. The sample comprised 1681 Spanish university students who reported the exposure to different types of family violence during their childhood. Both psychological and physical family violence were analyzed separately. Results showed that both witnessing marital psychological violence and parent-to-child psychological aggression are related to CPV. Furthermore, psychological and physical parent-to-child aggression as well as witnessing physical aggression between parents was associated with physical CPV. Multigroup analyses showed that the relationships among variables were not signifi cantly different as a function of sex. This fi nding suggests that the relation between exposure to family violence and CPV is similar for men and women.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A psychological profile that combines internalizing problems and an instrumental use of violence in adolescents who perpetrate CPV is suggested, which should be understood in the context of permissibility and lack of limits within the family.
Abstract: Child-to-parent violence (CPV) includes acts committed by a child to intentionally cause physical, psychological, or financial pain to a parent. Available data indicate increasing rates of CPV in Spain, which have been attributed to a tendency toward more permissive parenting styles and changes in the power cycles within the families. The primary aim of this study was to assess the predictive role of some behavioral and emotional characteristics of adolescents who perpetrate CPV. A total of 1,072 adolescents (601 girls) filled out measures of CPV, proactive and reactive aggression, depressive symptoms, and substance abuse at Time 1, and measures of CPV 6 months later. The results showed that CPV was predicted by proactive, but not by reactive, aggression. This finding supports an instrumental role for CPV, which should be understood in the context of permissibility and lack of limits within the family. Depression and substance abuse also predicted the increase of CPV over time. Moreover, there were no sex...

108 citations


Cites background or result from "Violencia filioparental y su asocia..."

  • ...Thus, various studies have identified factors such as exposure to violence (e.g., Boxer et al., 2009; Gamez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012), verbal punishment (Pagani et al., 2009), and emotional deprivation (Agnew & Huguley, 1989) as risk factors for CPV....

    [...]

  • ...…the frequency of physical acts of CPV, there were no sex differences in the prevalence rate of physical CPV, which is consistent with some studies (Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; McCloskey & Lichter, 2003) but differs from the studies that find a higher prevalence among boys (see Boxer et al.,…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored the exposure to violence in different settings (school, community, home, and TV) and its relationship to some variables of the social-cognitive processing (hostile social perception, impulsivity, ability to anticipate the consequences of social behaviors and to select the appropriate means to achieve the goals of social behaviours) in a group of juveniles who assaulted their parents.
Abstract: Research suggests that child-to-parent violence (CPV) is related to a previous history of violence within the family setting. The current study was aimed to explore the exposure to violence in different settings (school, community, home, and TV) and its relationship to some variables of the social-cognitive processing (hostile social perception, impulsivity, ability to anticipate the consequences of social behaviors and to select the appropriate means to achieve the goals of social behaviors) in a group of juveniles who assaulted their parents. It is also examined how they differ from other young offenders and non-offender adolescents. The sample included 90 adolescents from Jaen (Spain). Thirty of them were juveniles who had been reported by their parents for being violent towards them and 30 were juveniles who had committed other types of offences. The third group was made up of 30 adolescents without any criminal charge. Adolescents answered measures of exposure to violence, perception of criticism/rejection from parents, hostile social perception, and social problem- solving skills. Results revealed that juveniles who abused their parents reported higher levels of exposure to violence at home when comparing to the other groups. In addition, exposure to violence at home was significantly correlated to the hostile social perception of adolescents in CPV cases. Implications for prevention and treatment are discussed.

83 citations


Cites background or result from "Violencia filioparental y su asocia..."

  • ...…in families where both inter-parental and parent-to-child violence were present are more likely to engage in CPV when comparing to those adolescents who did not suffered violence at home (Calvete, Orue, & Sampedro, 2011; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe et al., 2013; Routt & Anderson, 2011)....

    [...]

  • ...Although some authors have not found differences by sex (e.g., Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012), other studies reported that the bidirectionality of family violence is higher in sons than in daughters (Ibabe & Jaureguizar, 2011; Ibabe et al., 2013)....

    [...]

  • ...…home than other young offenders and non-offender adolescents, which is in line with previous studies with community samples (Calvete et al., 2011, Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe et al., 2013; Margolin & Baucom, 2014; Pagani et al., 2004, 2009; Routt & Anderson, 2011), as well as with…...

    [...]

  • ...…scores in violence exposure at home in the group of CPV offenders when compared to the other groups (Boxer et al., 2009; Calvete et al., 2011; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe et al., 2013; Ibabe et al., 2009; Routt & Anderson, 2011) and, consequently, exposure to violence at home will be…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the association of family characteristics associated with child-to-parent aggressions in adolescents and found that low levels of affection and communication were associated with all forms of severe CPA.
Abstract: Title: Family characteristics associated with child-to-parent aggressions in adolescents. Abstract: The Child-to-Parent Aggression (CPA) is an area of growing in- terest. Previous studies suggest that a variety of family factors can act as explanatory elements of the CPA, such as exposure to violence, emotional neglect and permissive parenting style. This study examined the association of these factors with the occurrence of severe physical and psychological CPA. A total of 1698 adolescents (870 boys and 828 girls), aged between 12 and 17 years, answered CPA measures, exposure to violence, affection and communication, parental abandonment and permissive parenting style. Results of logistic regression analysis showed that low levels of affection and communication were associated with all forms of severe CPA. Wit- nessing family violence was associated with the physical VFP against fa- thers whereas direct victimization in family was associated with physical CPA against mothers, and psychological CPA against both parents. The permissive style was associated with the severe psychological CPA but not with the physical CPA.

75 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analytic review was designed with 26 effect sizes assessing the relationship between child-to-parent and parent-tochild violence in 19 primary studies.
Abstract: In order to examine the literature on the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence, a meta-analytic review was designed with 26 effect sizes assessing the relationship between child-to-parent and parent-to-child violence in 19 primary studies. Correlational effect sizes were computed and corrected for sampling error, and predictor and criterion unreliability. The results showed a significantly positive, medium magnitude (ρ = .36) mean true effect size for the relationship between child-to-parent violence and parent-to-child violence. Similar results were found for direct and vicarious victimization. The probability of developing child-to-parent violence for children victimized by parents increased 71% as compared to non-victimized children. The child-to parent violence type (physical or psychological), and the population (judicial or community) were analysed as moderators. The results revealed similar effects in both types of child-to-parent violence and in both populations: a significantly positive, medium in magnitude mean true effect size. The theoretical and practical implications for measuring child-to parent violence are discussed.

70 citations


Cites background from "Violencia filioparental y su asocia..."

  • ...Similar results were found with community (Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe, 2015; Margolin & Baucom, 2014) and judicial (Contreras & Cano, 2014, 2016; Kennedy et al., 2010) populations....

    [...]

  • ...Both the direct type of child victimization, (Calvete, Orue, & Sampedro, 2011; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Hartz, 1995; Ibabe, 2015; Kennedy, Edmonds, Dann, & Burnett, 2010; Kratcoski, 1985; Maxwell & Maxwell, 2003; Meredith, Abbot, & Adams, 1986; Ulman & Straus, 2003) and the vicarious type…...

    [...]

  • ...…1985; Maxwell & Maxwell, 2003; Meredith, Abbot, & Adams, 1986; Ulman & Straus, 2003) and the vicarious type (Calvete et al., 2011; Carlson, 1990; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe, 2015; Kennedy et al., 2010; Livingston 1986; Ulman & Straus, 2003) are believed to raise the likelihood of…...

    [...]

  • ...…between child-to-parent violence type with victimization from parents has also been studied, showing that victimized children exercised both types of violence on parents (Calvete et al., 2011; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Lyons, Bell, Frechette, & Romano, 2015; Margolin & Baucom, 2014)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Findings broaden the understanding of different family and child-related factors that either promote or prevent CPV and point to the importance of the parenting context and especially harsh discipline practices for the occurrence of both physical and verbal CPV.
Abstract: Child-to-parent violence (CPV) is a social problem that remains vastly understudied compared with other forms of family violence. The aim of this study is to identify family and child risk and prot...

64 citations


Cites background or result from "Violencia filioparental y su asocia..."

  • ...…Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(3-4) that involve disciplinary acts, such as the use of corporal punishment (Boxer et al., 2009; Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Margolin & Baucom, 2014), and, to a lesser extent, verbal aggression (Pagani et al., 2004, 2009) or emotional…...

    [...]

  • ...In clinical samples, more male children have been identified as aggressors of CPV (Boxer et al., 2009), while community samples suggest similar rates of CPV for males and females (Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Pagani et al., 2004, 2009; Ulman & Straus, 2003)....

    [...]

  • ...These results reproduce results of previous studies conducted in different national contexts (Gámez-Guadix & Calvete, 2012; Ibabe et al., 2013)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the adequacy of the conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice were examined, and the results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to.95 for TLI, BL89, CFI, RNI, and G...
Abstract: This article examines the adequacy of the “rules of thumb” conventional cutoff criteria and several new alternatives for various fit indexes used to evaluate model fit in practice. Using a 2‐index presentation strategy, which includes using the maximum likelihood (ML)‐based standardized root mean squared residual (SRMR) and supplementing it with either Tucker‐Lewis Index (TLI), Bollen's (1989) Fit Index (BL89), Relative Noncentrality Index (RNI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Gamma Hat, McDonald's Centrality Index (Mc), or root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), various combinations of cutoff values from selected ranges of cutoff criteria for the ML‐based SRMR and a given supplemental fit index were used to calculate rejection rates for various types of true‐population and misspecified models; that is, models with misspecified factor covariance(s) and models with misspecified factor loading(s). The results suggest that, for the ML method, a cutoff value close to .95 for TLI, BL89, CFI, RNI, and G...

76,383 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, an exploración de the avances contemporaneos en la teoria del aprendizaje social, con especial enfasis en los importantes roles que cumplen los procesos cognitivos, indirectos, and autoregulatorios.
Abstract: Una exploracion de los avances contemporaneos en la teoria del aprendizaje social, con especial enfasis en los importantes roles que cumplen los procesos cognitivos, indirectos, y autoregulatorios.

20,904 citations


"Violencia filioparental y su asocia..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Ello sugiere que, en general, los hijos aprenden formas similares de violencia a las que han sido modeladas por sus padres (Bandura, 1977)....

    [...]

  • ...Por otra parte, los padres podrían estar proporcionando un modelo de conducta agresiva que los hijos podrían imitar en un futuro contra los propios padres (Bandura, 1977; Straus et al., 1980)....

    [...]

  • ...…coerción física y verbal constituyen medios adecuados y aceptables para modifi car la conducta de los demás, lo cual se manifestaría en diferentes problemas externos de conducta (Bandura, 1977), entre ellos VFP. Las relaciones fueron consistentes según el tipo de violencia (física o psicológica)....

    [...]

Book
21 Jul 2011
TL;DR: Structural Equation Models: The Basics using the EQS Program and testing for Construct Validity: The Multitrait-Multimethod Model and Change Over Time: The Latent Growth Curve Model.
Abstract: Psychology is a science that advances by leaps and bounds The impulse of new mathematical models along with the incorporation of computers to research has drawn a new reality with many methodological progresses that only a few people could imagine not too long ago Such progress has no doubt revolutionized the panorama of research in the behavioral sciences Structural Equation Models are a clear example of this Under this label are usually included a series of state-of-the-art multivariate statistical procedures that allow the researcher to test theoryguided hypotheses with clearly confi rmatory ends as well as to establish causal relations among variables Confi rmatory factor analysis, the study of measurement invariance, or the multitraitmultimethod models are some of the procedures that stem from this methodology In this sense, it would be diffi cult to fi nd a scientifi c journal that publishes empirical works in psychology that does not address some of these issues, so their current transcendence is undeniable The manual written by the Full Professor of the University of Ottawa, Barbara M Byrne, is a link in a series of books that address this topic Throughout her long academic trajectory, Professor Byrne developed interesting and popular work focused on bringing the researcher and the professional layman—and not so layman—closer to the diverse statistical programs available on the market for data analysis from the perspective of structural equation models (ie, LISREL, AMOS, EQS) (Byrne, 1998, 2001, 2006) Bearing this in mind, the main goal of this work is to introduce the reader to the basic concepts of this methodology, in a simple and entertaining way, avoiding mathematical technicisms and statistical jargon For this purpose, we used the statistical program Mplus 60 (Muthen & Muthen, 2007-2010), an extremely suggestive software that incorporates interesting applications The authoress provides a practical guide that leads the reader through illustrative examples of how to proceed step by step with the Mplus, from the initial specifi cations of the model to the interpretation of the output fi les On the one hand, we underline that the data used proceed from prior investigations and can be consulted in the Internet, offering the reader the possibility of practicing with them (http://wwwpsypresscom/sem-with-mplus/ datasets/); on the other hand, updating the information with novel and apt bibliographic references allows the reader to study in more depth the diverse topics that are presented in the manual, if he or she so desires The book consists of four sections, with a total of 12 chapters The fi rst section, Chapters 1 and 2, addresses introductory terms related to structural equation models and working with the Mplus program at a user-level The second unit focuses on data analysis with a single group In Chapter 3, the factor validity of the self-concept is tested by means of confi rmatory factor analysis In Chapter 4, the authoress performs a fi rst-order confi rmatory factor analysis, in which she examines the validity of the scores of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) in a sample of teachers In Chapter 5, the internal structure of the scores on the Beck Depression Inventory-II is analyzed by means of second-order confi rmatory factor analysis in a sample of Chinese adolescents In the next chapter, the complete model of structural equations is tested, and the authoress examines the causal relation established between diverse variables (ie, work climate, self-esteem, social support) and Burnout The third section of the manual is, in my opinion, the most interesting, not only because of the expansion of the study of measurement invariance in recent years but also because of the expansion it may possibly have in the future In this section, Professor Byrne goes into multigroup comparisons Specifi cally, in Chapter 7, she examines the factor equivalence of the MBI in two samples of teachers by means of the analysis of covariance structures In this chapter, she introduces relevant concepts, such as types of invariance (confi gural, metric, and strict) or the invariance of partial measurement In Chapter 8, she also analyzes measurement invariance, using for this purpose the analysis of mean and covariance structures This analysis, in comparison to the analysis of covariance structures, allows contrasting the latent means of two or more groups With this goal, she verifi es whether there is measurement invariance between the scores on the Self-description Questionnaire-I in Nigerian and Australian adolescents In Chapter 9, she proposes a complete model of structural equations in which she tests the causal structure through the procedure of cross validation Lastly, in the fourth section, she reveals three very interesting topics, that are also up-to-date and that, to some degree, go beyond the initial goal of the book, such as the multitrait-multimethod models, latent growth curves, and multilevel models Summing up, the work “Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming” is of enormous interest and utility for all professionals of psychology and related sciences who, without having exhaustive knowledge of the details of structural equation models, wish to test their hypothetical models by means of the Mplus program No doubt, this is a reference manual, a must-read that is accessible and that has a high degree of methodological rigor We hope that the readers

16,616 citations

Book
01 Nov 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the EQS program is used to test the factorial verifiability of a theoretical construct and its invariance to a Causal Structure using the First-Order CFA model.
Abstract: Contents: Part I: Introduction. Structural Equation Models: The Basics. Using the EQS Program. Part II: Single-Group Analyses. Application 1: Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Theoretical Construct (First-Order CFA Model). Application 2: Testing for the Factorial Validity of Scores From a Measuring Instrument (First-Order CFA Model). Application 3: Testing for the Factorial Validity of Scores from a Measuring Instrument (Second-Order CFA Model). Application 4: Testing for the Validity of a Causal Structure. Part III: Multiple-Group Analyses. Application 5: Testing for the Factorial Invariance of a Measuring Instrument. Application 6: Testing for the Invariance of a Causal Structure. Application 7: Testing for Latent Mean Differences (First-Order CFA Model). Application 8: Testing for Latent Mean Differences (Second-Order CFA Model). Part IV: Other Important Topics. Application 9: Testing for Construct Validity: The Multitrait-Multimethod Model. Application 10: Testing for Change Over Time: The Latent Growth Curve Model. Application 11: Testing for Within- and Between-Level Variance: The Multilevel Model.

13,439 citations