What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications

TLDR: This article evaluated the replicability of social psychological research and found that failure to replicate a finding does not necessarily indicate that the original result was wrong, although evidence of replication failures resulted in important methodological changes, the 2015 Open Science Collaboration findings sufficed to make the point.

Abstract: Several hundred research groups attempted replications of published effects in so-called Many Labs studies involving thousands of research participants. Given this enormous investment, it seems timely to assess what has been learned and what can be learned from this type of project. My evaluation addresses four questions: First, do these replication studies inform us about the replicability of social psychological research? Second, can replications detect fraud? Third, does the failure to replicate a finding indicate that the original result was wrong? Finally, do these replications help to support or disprove any social psychological theories? Although evidence of replication failures resulted in important methodological changes, the 2015 Open Science Collaboration findings sufficed to make the point. To assess the state of social psychology, we have to evaluate theories rather than randomly selected research findings.