Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life
Summary (1 min read)
Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life
- This article provides evidence that g has pervasive utility in work settings because it is essentially the ability to deal with cognitive complexity, in particular, with complex information processing.
- Few claims in the social sciences are backed by such massive evidence but remain so hotly contested in public discourse.
- Besides demonstrating that g is important in practical affairs, I seek to demonstrate why intelligence has such surprisingly pervasive importance in the lives of individuals.
- I then use both the employment and literacy data to sketch a portrait of life’s challenges and opportunities at different levels of intelligence.
WHAT DOES “IMPORTANT” MEAN?
- The nature of the job and its context seem to determine whether g has any direct effect on task proficiency, net of job knowlege.
- As is well known in psychometrics (see also Gordon, 1997), the fact that an individual passes or fails any single test item says little about that person’s general intelligence level.
INFLUENCE OF INTELLIGENCE ON OVERALL LIFE OUTCOMES
- The effects of intelligence-like other psychological traits-are probabilistic, not deterministic.
- White adults in this range marry, work, and have children (Hermstein & Murray, 1994), but, as Table 10 shows, they are nonetheless at great risk of living in poverty (30%), bearing children out of wedlock (32%), and becoming chronic welfare dependents (31%).
- At this IQ level, fewer than half the high school graduates and none of the dropouts meet the military’s minimum AFQT enlistment standards.
- Most occupations are within reach cognitively, because these individuals learn complex material fairly easily and independently.
- Such as divorce, illness, and occasional unemployment, they rarely become trapped in poverty or social pathology.
THE FUTURE
- Complexity enriches social and cultural life, but it also risks leaving some individuals behind.
- Society has become more complex-and g loaded-as the authors have entered the information age and postindustrial economy.
- Accordingly, organizations are “flatter” (have fewer hierarchical levels), and increasing numbers of jobs require high-level cognitive and interpersonal skills (Camevale, 1991; Cascio, 1995; Hunt, 1995; Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, 1991).
- There is evidence that increasing proportions of individuals with below-average IQs are having trouble adapting to their increasingly complex modern life (Granat & Granat, 1978) and that social inequality along IQ lines is increasing (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994).
- As the military experience also illustrates, however, what is good pedagogy for the low-aptitude learner may be inappropriate for the high-aptitude person.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
2 citations
2 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...Moreover, Gf is closely related to professional and educational success especially in complex and demanding environments (Gottfredson, 1997). There is considerable agreement that Gf is robust against influences of education and socialization (Gray & Thompson, 2004), Catell (1963), Baltes, Staudinger, & Lindenberger, 1999)....
[...]
...Moreover, Gf is closely related to professional and educational success especially in complex and demanding environments (Gottfredson, 1997). There is considerable agreement that Gf is robust against influences of education and socialization (Gray & Thompson, 2004), Catell (1963), Baltes, Staudinger, & Lindenberger, 1999). It has been argued that the strong relationship between working memory and Gf primarily results from the involvement of attentional control being essential for both skills (Halford, Cowan, & Andrews, 2007). With regard to vocabulary, the notions of crystallised and fluid intelligence can be utilised as well. For instance, vocabulary knowledge has been described as static or crystallised knowledge. On the contrary, the ability to use a wide range of different words in conversation can be conceptualized as one type of fluid knowledge (Hayashi, Kato, Igarashi, & Kashima (2007). How then can vocabulary use as a type of fluid knowledge be conceptualised within Gupta and Tisdale’s (2009) model? We understand that the acoustic traces that we hear generate the word form phonological representations, and the word form representations evoke a semantic representation to yield meaning....
[...]
...Moreover, Gf is closely related to professional and educational success especially in complex and demanding environments (Gottfredson, 1997)....
[...]
2 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...IQ predicts socioeconomic status (Kanazawa, 2006; Strenze, 2007), educational achievement (Deary, Strand, Smith, & Fernandes, 2007; Gottfredson, 1997; Lynn & Mikk, 2009; Strenze, 2007), occupational status and job success (Gottfredson, 2002; 1 We appreciate an anonymous reviewer on a prior version…...
[...]
...Having a higher intelligence has been found to be a correlate of completing more years of education (Deary, Strand, Smith, & Fernandes, 2007; Gottfredson, 1997; Lynn & Mikk, 2009; Strenze, 2007), gaining a higher status career (Gottfredson, 2002; Strenze, 2007) and living longer (Deary, Weiss, &…...
[...]
...Researchers have been studying and refining the concept of g since Spearman (1904) first proposed it in the beginning of the 20th century as a way to conceptualize overall mental ability rather than variation across a specific ability (e.g. verbal ability) (Gottfredson, 1997; 2002)....
[...]
2 citations
2 citations
References
11,512 citations
9,611 citations
8,018 citations
7,809 citations
5,832 citations