Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life
Summary (1 min read)
Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life
- This article provides evidence that g has pervasive utility in work settings because it is essentially the ability to deal with cognitive complexity, in particular, with complex information processing.
- Few claims in the social sciences are backed by such massive evidence but remain so hotly contested in public discourse.
- Besides demonstrating that g is important in practical affairs, I seek to demonstrate why intelligence has such surprisingly pervasive importance in the lives of individuals.
- I then use both the employment and literacy data to sketch a portrait of life’s challenges and opportunities at different levels of intelligence.
WHAT DOES “IMPORTANT” MEAN?
- The nature of the job and its context seem to determine whether g has any direct effect on task proficiency, net of job knowlege.
- As is well known in psychometrics (see also Gordon, 1997), the fact that an individual passes or fails any single test item says little about that person’s general intelligence level.
INFLUENCE OF INTELLIGENCE ON OVERALL LIFE OUTCOMES
- The effects of intelligence-like other psychological traits-are probabilistic, not deterministic.
- White adults in this range marry, work, and have children (Hermstein & Murray, 1994), but, as Table 10 shows, they are nonetheless at great risk of living in poverty (30%), bearing children out of wedlock (32%), and becoming chronic welfare dependents (31%).
- At this IQ level, fewer than half the high school graduates and none of the dropouts meet the military’s minimum AFQT enlistment standards.
- Most occupations are within reach cognitively, because these individuals learn complex material fairly easily and independently.
- Such as divorce, illness, and occasional unemployment, they rarely become trapped in poverty or social pathology.
THE FUTURE
- Complexity enriches social and cultural life, but it also risks leaving some individuals behind.
- Society has become more complex-and g loaded-as the authors have entered the information age and postindustrial economy.
- Accordingly, organizations are “flatter” (have fewer hierarchical levels), and increasing numbers of jobs require high-level cognitive and interpersonal skills (Camevale, 1991; Cascio, 1995; Hunt, 1995; Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, 1991).
- There is evidence that increasing proportions of individuals with below-average IQs are having trouble adapting to their increasingly complex modern life (Granat & Granat, 1978) and that social inequality along IQ lines is increasing (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994).
- As the military experience also illustrates, however, what is good pedagogy for the low-aptitude learner may be inappropriate for the high-aptitude person.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
48 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...Similarly, Gottfredson (1997) concluded that no other individual difference “has such generalized utility across the sweep of jobs in the U.S. economy” (p. 83)....
[...]
48 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...(p. 250) More recently, Gottfredson (1997) stated, “Although researchers disagree on how they define intelligence, there is virtual unanimity that it ref lects the ability to reason, solve problems, think abstractly, and acquire knowledge” (p. 93)....
[...]
48 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...The effects of cognitive skills on academic, work, and social outcomes have been extensively analyzed (Cawley, Heckman, and Vytlacil, 2001; Herrnstein and Murray, 1994; Neal and Johnson, 1996; Gottfredson, 1997; Hartigan and Wigdor, 1989; Mulligan, 1999; Murnane, Duhaldeborde, and Tyler, 2000; Lazear, 2003)....
[...]
48 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...Standard works on testing have regularly included reviews of data on cognitive ability by occupation (Gottfredson, 1997b; Jensen, 1980; Matarazzo, 1972; Tyler, 1965; Wechsler, 1958), and there is, no doubt, a clear gradient in...
[...]
...For example, Gottfredson (1997b) describes g as “the ability to deal with complexity” (pp. 81, 93)....
[...]
...(Gottfredson 1997a, p. 13) Within the same volume of Intelligence, Carroll’s judicious review cites numerous efforts to define the meaning of intelligence and reports little agreement....
[...]
...Standard works on testing have regularly included reviews of data on cognitive ability by occupation (Gottfredson, 1997b; Jensen, 1980; Matarazzo, 1972; Tyler, 1965; Wechsler, 1958), and there is, no doubt, a clear gradient in EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER98 average levels of measured cognitive ability…...
[...]
...The importance of cognitive ability is by no means as great, nor its malleability as slight, as is suggested by advocates like Herrnstein and Murray (Herrnstein, 1973; Herrnstein & Murray, 1994), Eysenck (1971), Jensen (1980, 1998), Seligman (1992), and Gottfredson (1997b)....
[...]
48 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...General ability scores are not only famously stable and reliable, but they are unmatched in terms of the number of studies providing evidence of predictive validity (Gottfredson, 1997)....
[...]
References
11,512 citations
9,611 citations
8,018 citations
7,809 citations
5,832 citations