Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life
Summary (1 min read)
Why g Matters: The Complexity of Everyday Life
- This article provides evidence that g has pervasive utility in work settings because it is essentially the ability to deal with cognitive complexity, in particular, with complex information processing.
- Few claims in the social sciences are backed by such massive evidence but remain so hotly contested in public discourse.
- Besides demonstrating that g is important in practical affairs, I seek to demonstrate why intelligence has such surprisingly pervasive importance in the lives of individuals.
- I then use both the employment and literacy data to sketch a portrait of life’s challenges and opportunities at different levels of intelligence.
WHAT DOES “IMPORTANT” MEAN?
- The nature of the job and its context seem to determine whether g has any direct effect on task proficiency, net of job knowlege.
- As is well known in psychometrics (see also Gordon, 1997), the fact that an individual passes or fails any single test item says little about that person’s general intelligence level.
INFLUENCE OF INTELLIGENCE ON OVERALL LIFE OUTCOMES
- The effects of intelligence-like other psychological traits-are probabilistic, not deterministic.
- White adults in this range marry, work, and have children (Hermstein & Murray, 1994), but, as Table 10 shows, they are nonetheless at great risk of living in poverty (30%), bearing children out of wedlock (32%), and becoming chronic welfare dependents (31%).
- At this IQ level, fewer than half the high school graduates and none of the dropouts meet the military’s minimum AFQT enlistment standards.
- Most occupations are within reach cognitively, because these individuals learn complex material fairly easily and independently.
- Such as divorce, illness, and occasional unemployment, they rarely become trapped in poverty or social pathology.
THE FUTURE
- Complexity enriches social and cultural life, but it also risks leaving some individuals behind.
- Society has become more complex-and g loaded-as the authors have entered the information age and postindustrial economy.
- Accordingly, organizations are “flatter” (have fewer hierarchical levels), and increasing numbers of jobs require high-level cognitive and interpersonal skills (Camevale, 1991; Cascio, 1995; Hunt, 1995; Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, 1991).
- There is evidence that increasing proportions of individuals with below-average IQs are having trouble adapting to their increasingly complex modern life (Granat & Granat, 1978) and that social inequality along IQ lines is increasing (Herrnstein & Murray, 1994).
- As the military experience also illustrates, however, what is good pedagogy for the low-aptitude learner may be inappropriate for the high-aptitude person.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
47 citations
47 citations
47 citations
Cites background from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...Cognitive ability is an important general indicator of life coping skills and ability to make sense of the environment (Gottfredson, 1997; Fiocco & Yaffe, 2010)....
[...]
47 citations
Cites background or methods from "Why g matters: The complexity of ev..."
...Because of the ability to process complex information accurately (Gottfredson, 1997), we also theorize that more intelligent individuals would be able to better assimilate and weigh job market information and, therefore, perceive greater alternative opportunities (Boudreau, Boswell, Judge, & Bretz,…...
[...]
...…reflecting one’s information-processing capacity that facilitates reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making, is more likely to enable judgment-driven behaviors (Ackerman, 1996; Gottfredson, 1997) and may aid in self-regulation through these executive functions (Duggan & Garcia-Barrera, 2015)....
[...]
...Such theories (e.g., Ackerman, 1996; Barrick et al., 2013; Duggan & Garcia-Barrera, 2015; Gottfredson, 1997; Gray, 1970; Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996) argue that these individual differences relate to behaviors through individuals’ motives (e....
[...]
...GMA may also influence behaviors by means of motivations developed based on past performance and successes, such as selfefficacy (Heggestad & Kanfer, 2005) and growth striving (Ackerman & Heggestad, 1997; Gottfredson, 1997)....
[...]
...In contrast, GMA, reflecting one’s information-processing capacity that facilitates reasoning, problem-solving, and decision-making, is more likely to enable judgment-driven behaviors (Ackerman, 1996; Gottfredson, 1997) and may aid in self-regulation through these executive functions (Duggan & Garcia-Barrera, 2015)....
[...]
References
11,512 citations
9,611 citations
8,018 citations
7,809 citations
5,832 citations