X-33 Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition
read more
Citations
Studies on Fluid-Thermal-Structural Coupling for Aerothermoelasticity in Hypersonic Flow
Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends
Aeroelastic and Aerothermoelastic Analysis of Hypersonic Vehicles: Current Status and Future Trends
Aeroelastic analysis of hypersonic vehicles
X-38 Experimental Aerothermodynamics
References
Surface temperature/heat transfer measurement using a quantitative phosphor thermography system
Reduction and Analysis of Phosphor Thermography Data With the IHEAT Software Package
Langley hypersonic aerodynamic/aerothermodynamic testing capabilities - Present and future
Shuttle Orbiter Experimental Boundary-Layer Transition Results with Isolated Roughness
Approximate method for calculating heating rates on three-dimensional vehicles
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What is the way to obtain accurate heat transfer data?
In order to obtain accurate heat transfer data using the one-dimensional heat conduction equation, models need to be made of a material with low thermal diffusivity and well-defined, uniform, isotropic thermal properties.
Q3. How can the velocity thickness be calculated?
By iterating on this velocity gradient, the momentum thickness Reynolds number from the swept cylinder calculation can be matched to the approximate three-dimensional momentum thickness Reynolds computed by LATCH.
Q4. How long did the model have to be exposed to the flow?
Run times up to 15 minutes are possible with this facility, although for the current heat transfer and flow visualization tests, the model was exposed to the flow for only a few seconds.
Q5. What was the distribution of the roughness?
The distributed roughness was in the form of a wavywall that simulates the expected metallic TPS Panel bowing in flight due to temperature gradients across the panel.
Q6. What is the effect of the thermal gradients within the metallic TPS panels?
During a hypersonic entry, thermal gradients within the metallic TPS panels will produce an outward bowing of the panels on the order of 0.25-in.
Q7. How many layers of Kapton tape were used to obtain the roughness heights?
Variations on the roughness heights (k) were obtained by stacking multiple layers of Kapton tape (k = 0.0025, 0.0050, and 0.0075-inch).
Q8. What is the common form of surface roughness in the Shuttle?
For a majority of these flights, boundary layer transition has been dominated by surface roughness (Ref. 10), in the form of launchinduced damage and/or protruding gap fillers.
Q9. What is the main advantage of phosphor thermography?
Phosphor thermography is routinely used in Langley's hypersonic facilities as quantitative global surface heating information is obtained from models that can be fabricated quickly (within a few weeks) and economically (cost an order of magnitude less than the thin-film technique).
Q10. What was used to predict the location of the attachment lines for the X-33?
The LATCH code (Ref. 5) was used to predict the location of the attachment lines for angles of attack of 20, 30, and 40-deg (with nominal tunnel flow conditions as inputs).
Q11. What are the examples of typical heating images?
Examples of typical heating images, which illustrate flow symmetry, and extracted heating profiles along the attachment line are provided in Figs. 16 and 17.
Q12. Who was critical to the successful completion of this work?
The following individuals were critical to the successful completion of this work: Mark Cagle, Joe Powers, Mark Griffin, Mike Powers, Rhonda Manis, Grace Gleason, Johnny Ellis, Bert Senter, Sheila Wright, Glenn Bittner, Steve Alter, Matt Kowalkowski, Derek Liechty, and Richard Wheless.
Q13. What is the effect of bowed panels on the boundary layer?
Further analysis of the distributed bowed panel results is required to determine if bowed panels in the vicinity of the chine region might influence the crossflow dominated flow field at lower angles of attack.
Q14. What was the effect of the Rev-C configuration on the forebody?
The Rev-C configuration instituted small modifications to the nose shape (to simplify the construction of the metallic TPS panels) and to the base region (in the vicinity of the engine).
Q15. What was the effect of bowed panels on the aft body?
the effect of bowed panels was qualitatively shown to be less effective than the discrete trips, however, the distributed nature of the bowed panels affected a larger percent of the aft-body than a single discrete trip.
Q16. How is the X-33 expected to transition back to a turbulent state?
Based on earlier results published in Ref. 6, the X-33 boundary layer is expected to transition back to a turbulent state at a Mach number near 9.
Q17. How many units of kapton tape were used to obtain the smooth baseline data?
For each model configuration, the unit Reynolds number was varied between 1 and 8 million per foot to obtain the smooth baseline data for comparison to the tripped data.