scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Yeast biodiversity in vineyards and wineries and its importance to the South African Wine Industry. A review

01 May 2017-South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture (South African Society for Enology and Viticulture)-Vol. 20, Iss: 2, pp 61-70
TL;DR: A taxonomic survey of yeast species and strains can be found in this article, where the authors present a taxonomic analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the 16 chromosomes of a laboratory strain of S. cerevisiae.
Abstract: The art of winemaking is as old as human civilization and the use of yeast in this complex ecological and biochemical process dates back to ancient times. Traditionally, yeasts associated with grape berries were simply allowed to ferment the sugars to ethanol, carbon dioxide and other minor, but important, metabolites. Spontaneous fermentations are still being used in boutique wineries that depend more on vintage variability. Various microbes found on the surface of grape skins and the indigenous microbiota associated with winery surfaces participate in these natural wine fermentations. Yeasts of the genera Kloeckera, Hanseniaspora and Candida predominate in the early stages, followed by several species of Metschnikowia and Pichia (including those species that were previously assigned to the genus Hansenula) in the middle stages when the ethanol rises to 3-4%. The latter stages of natural wine fermentations are invariably dominated by the alcohol-tolerant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, other yeasts, such as species of Brettanomyces, Kluyveromyces, Schizosaccharomyces, Torulaspora and Zygosaccharomyces also may be present during the fermentation and can occur in the resultant wine. By contrast, the rule, rather than the exception, for modern wineries depending on reliable fermentation and the production of wines with predictable quality, is the use of specially selected starter cultures of Saccharomyces. However, the use of such cultures may not necessarily prevent the growth and metabolic activity of indigenous, winery associated strains of S. cerevisiae or other wild yeasts such as Kloeckera apiculata, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Candida stellata and Torulaspora delbrueckii. It is therefore clear that both spontaneous and inoculated wine fermentations are affected by the diversity of yeasts associated with the vineyard (natural habitat) and winery (man-made niche). In light of this, focused taxonomic surveys within an ecological framework are essential to preserve and exploit the hidden oenological potential of the untapped wealth of yeast biodiversity in our wine-producing regions. To achieve this, yeast taxonomists need to continue to isolate and characterize new yeast species and strains, while wine microbiologists develop improved identification techniques that differentiate more efficiently among individual strains. At the same time such biological surveys will complement strain development and the current international effort of molecular biologists to assign a biological function to the products of each of the 6000 genes identified by computer analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the 16 chromosomes of a laboratory strain of S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, only when we have a much better understanding of yeast biodeversity, biogeography, ecology and the interaction within yeast communities will we be able to optimally harness gene technology that will benefit both the wine producer and the consumer.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
15 Jun 2000-Yeast
TL;DR: In light of the limited knowledge of industrial wine yeasts' complex genomes and the daunting challenges to comply with strict statutory regulations and consumer demands regarding the future use of genetically modified strains, this review cautions against unrealistic expectations over the short term.
Abstract: Yeasts are predominant in the ancient and complex process of winemaking. In spontaneous fermentations, there is a progressive growth pattern of indigenous yeasts, with the final stages invariably being dominated by the alcohol-tolerant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This species is universally known as the ‘wine yeast’ and is widely preferred for initiating wine fermentations. The primary role of wine yeast is to catalyze the rapid, complete and efficient conversion of grape sugars to ethanol, carbon dioxide and other minor, but important, metabolites without the development of off-flavours. However, due to the demanding nature of modern winemaking practices and sophisticated wine markets, there is an ever-growing quest for specialized wine yeast strains possessing a wide range of optimized, improved or novel oenological properties. This review highlights the wealth of untapped indigenous yeasts with oenological potential, the complexity of wine yeasts’ genetic features and the genetic techniques often used in strain development. The current status of genetically improved wine yeasts and potential targets for further strain development are outlined. In light of the limited knowledge of industrial wine yeasts’ complex genomes and the daunting challenges to comply with strict statutory regulations and consumer demands regarding the future use of genetically modified strains, this review cautions against unrealistic expectations over the short term. However, the staggering potential advantages of improved wine yeasts to both the winemaker and consumer in the third millennium are pointed out. Copyright # 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1,162 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The importance of untapping the hidden wealth of indigenous yeast species present on grapes, and the selection and genetic development of yeast starter culture strains with improved flavour profiles are highlighted.
Abstract: The most mysterious aspect of wine is the endless variety of flavours that stem from a complex, completely non-linear system of interactions among many hundreds of compounds. In its widest sense, wine flavour refers to the overall impression of both aroma and taste components. Aroma is usually associated with odorous, volatile compounds; the bouquet of wine refers to the more complex flavour compounds which evolve as a result of fermentation, elevage and ageing. With the exception of terpenes in the aromatic grape varieties and alkoxypyrazines in the herbaceous cultivars, perceived flavour is the result of absolute amounts and specific ratios of many of these interactive compounds, rather than being attributable to a single "impact" compound. Without underestimating the complexity of these interactive effects or negating the definitive role played by the accumulated secondary grape metabolites in the varietal character of wine, this review will focus mainly on the contribution of yeast fermentation to the sensorial quality of the final product. Yeast and fermentation conditions are claimed to be the most important factors influencing the flavours in wine. Both spontaneous and inoculated wine fermentations are affected by the diversity of yeasts associated with the vineyard and winery. During the primary alcoholic fermentation of sugar, the wine yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, together with other indigenous non-Saccharomyces species, produce ethanol, carbon dioxide and a number of by-products. Of these yeast-derived metabolites, the alcohols, acetates and C4-C8 1tfatty acid ethyl esters are found in the highest concentration in wine. While the volatile metabolites contribute to the fermentation bouquet ubiquitous to all young wines, the production levels of these by-products are variable and yeast strain specific. Therefore, this article also highlights the importance of untapping the hidden wealth of indigenous yeast species present on grapes, and the selection and genetic development of yeast starter culture strains with improved flavour profiles. In the future, some winemakers may prefer to use mixtures of indigenous yeast species and tailored S. cerevisiae strains as starter cultures to reflect the biodiversity and stylistic distinctiveness of a given region. This will help winemakers to fullfil the consumer's demand for individual wines with intact local character and to ensure the survival of wine's most enthralling aspect - its endless variety.

860 citations


Cites background from "Yeast biodiversity in vineyards and..."

  • ...The final reduction step involves the reoxidation ofNADH + H+ to NAD+, and thus helps to maintain the redox balance within the cell (Van Dijken & Scheffers, 1986; Quain, 1988; Zoecklein et al., 1995)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article reviews the specific flavour-active characteristics of those non-Saccharomyces species that might play a positive role in both spontaneous and inoculated wine ferments and raises important questions about the direction of mixed-fermentation research to address market trends regarding so-called 'natural' wines.
Abstract: Saccharomyces cerevisiae and grape juice are ‘natural companions’ and make a happy wine marriage. However, this relationship can be enriched by allowing ‘wild’ non- Saccharomyces yeast to participate in a sequential manner in the early phases of grape must fermentation. However, such a triangular relationship is complex and can only be taken to ‘the next level’ if there are no spoilage yeast present and if the ‘wine yeast’ – S. cerevisiae – is able to exert its dominance in time to successfully complete the alcoholic fermentation. Winemakers apply various ‘matchmaking’ strategies (e.g. cellar hygiene, pH, SO2, temperature and nutrient management) to keep ‘spoilers’ (e.g. Dekkera bruxellensis ) at bay, and allow ‘compatible’ wild yeast (e.g. Torulaspora delbrueckii, Pichia kluyveri, Lachancea thermotolerans and Candida/Metschnikowia pulcherrima ) to harmonize with potent S. cerevisiae wine yeast and bring the best out in wine. Mismatching can lead to a ‘two is company, three is a crowd’ scenario. More than 40 of the 1500 known yeast species have been isolated from grape must. In this article, we review the specific flavour-active characteristics of those non- Saccharomyces species that might play a positive role in both spontaneous and inoculated wine ferments. We seek to present ‘single-species’ and ‘multi-species’ ferments in a new light and a new context, and we raise important questions about the direction of mixed-fermentation research to address market trends regarding so-called ‘natural’ wines. This review also highlights that, despite the fact that most frontier research and technological developments are often focussed primarily on S. cerevisiae , non- Saccharomyces research can benefit from the techniques and knowledge developed by research on the former.

649 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The impact of damaged grapes in yeast ecology has been underestimated mostly because of inaccurate grape sampling, and injured berries hidden in apparently sound bunches explain the recovery of a higher number of species when whole bunches are picked.

540 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The importance of yeast ecology and yeast metabolic reactions in determining wine quality is considered, new directions for exploiting yeasts in wine fermentation are discussed, and the prospects for mixed culture fermentations are explored.
Abstract: International competition within the wine market, consumer demands for newer styles of wines and increasing concerns about the environmental sustainability of wine production are providing new challenges for innovation in wine fermentation. Within the total production chain, the alcoholic fermentation of grape juice by yeasts is a key process where winemakers can creatively engineer wine character and value through better yeast management and, thereby, strategically tailor wines to a changing market. This review considers the importance of yeast ecology and yeast metabolic reactions in determining wine quality, and then discusses new directions for exploiting yeasts in wine fermentation. It covers criteria for selecting and developing new commercial strains, the possibilities of using yeasts other than those in the genus of Saccharomyces, the prospects for mixed culture fermentations and explores the possibilities for high cell density, continuous fermentations.

449 citations